Consoles or PC?

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by jimmy j, Jun 27, 2007.

?

What do you think is best gaming platform?

  1. Home Consoles

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Handheld

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. PC

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Jun 27, 2007

Consoles or PC? by jimmy j at 3:32 AM (2,741 Views / 0 Likes) 40 replies

  1. jimmy j
    OP

    Member jimmy j Awesome for hire.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    894
    Location:
    the congo
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I'm 100% for consoles myself. No hassle, plug n' play gaming for 5 years at a time [​IMG]
     


  2. MC DUI

    Member MC DUI GBAtemp Advanced Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,916
    Location:
    Newcastle, Australia
    Country:
    Australia
    I'm with you, it's all the mucking around with updating drivers and buying new hardware just to get games functioning that turns me off PC gaming.

    I'm not completely adverse to playing PC games, just prefer the comfort and ease of playing games on consoles.
     
  3. cheapassdave

    Member cheapassdave GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    220
    Country:
    United States
    im more into the pc because i love FPSs and its great online capabilities. when im playing the 360 it just feels like im playing a watered down pc [​IMG]
     
  4. 2cb2ct7

    Member 2cb2ct7 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Country:
    Australia
    Have to back the consoles... No brand spankin new f'n $600 video card required just to play the latest releases...
     
  5. darksavior

    Member darksavior GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    231
    Country:
    United States
    I like my pc for online gaming and fps. Console for everything else. Fps on consoles just sucks, sucks, sucks with pad.
     
  6. dsbomb

    Member dsbomb GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    487
    Location:
    Illinois, USA
    Country:
    United States
    Nah, just $600 consoles. The console market has the same sort of expensive bleeding-edge issues the PC does. I've played many PC games quite well with a less than top-notch system. I don't need every blade of grass swaying independently with the wind to be able to enjoy a game's action. Turn 'em down a bit, and get to the part where you have fun, rather than obsessing with having more polygons than your neighbor.
     
  7. jimmy j
    OP

    Member jimmy j Awesome for hire.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    894
    Location:
    the congo
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Buy a console and enjoy your games the way they were meant to be played - with all those dials turned up to 10!
     
  8. Lukeage

    Member Lukeage GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    178
    Country:
    Australia
    That maybe be true at the beginning, but by the end PCs are definitely ahead (obviously they cost more, but if you want it, its there). Up until this generation, consoles have also been limited by standard definition. Most hardcore PC gamers have been playing in 'high definition' for many many years. Remember that even 720p has less pixels than 1280x1024 and isn't a huge jump ahead of 1024x768.

    I'm already playing some games on resolutions higher than 1080p on my PC (although 1920x1200 isn't that much more), but gamers with the money can get their SLI 8800 rigs and 30" monitors that go even higher than that already.

    Back to the main topic though. It depends on the game. You could even break the question down further into PC vs Console vs Handheld. All three have varying types of inputs, so that is one factor I'll ignore for now. PCs have the advantage of games being easily modable, however, they have the disadvantage of needing to be setup (although I can't remember the last time I've had a showstopper issue for a PC game). Consoles have the advantage of quick setup and are better suited to 'casual' gaming (ie, bunch of friends round, easier to fire up the console than organise PC gaming). Handhelds have the advantage of being portable, and many of the games can be played at quick intervals or paused at any time without issues.

    In the end I have no major preference towards any of the platforms. Whatever offers the best experience for a certain game, thats the system I'll use.
     
  9. FAST6191

    Reporter FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,747
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    First for me it is really resolution schemsolution, provided the UI fits well enough on the screen (play something like morrowind on low res and see) I am happy.

    Personally it all really started for me with a nes, I soon realised that the PC was the way forward for me: emulation being the big drive and the fact I could do more than games. Ease of use does not really factor in to it for me: I have opposable thumbs and a brain that wastes a serious bit of energy for a reason.

    As for £600 a card most halfway sensible types wait a few months, that way drivers are good and prices are low: a couple of years ago I looked at building an SLI system: motherboard £1000 or so, 5 months ago my entire system (with SLI) cost me £1200 new. I often find even the most cutting edge stuff can not play top of the line either.

    As it stands someone has yet to show me a better way to play an FPS than a mouse and a keyboard (the n64 and xbox are good certainly but nowhere near better).

    As for handhelds they are an entirely different league, virtual boy and light issues aside I think Nintendo got it right for the most part.

    In the end I am a tightass so no winner provided I wait, games get good (any of honestly think launch titles stand after a few years on a regular basis), drivers get good (even consoles/handhelds have firmware updates), stuff gets cheap (I only got an xbox about a year ago), hype gets dissipated, cracks/security holes get found (my only problem as they tend to be for early iterations) and my internet connection gets faster: dial up is OK for nes and snes but an unripped PSX game?
     
  10. xcalibur

    Member xcalibur Gbatemp's Chocolate Bear

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,166
    Location:
    Sacred Heart
    Country:
    United Kingdom
  11. Lukeage

    Member Lukeage GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    178
    Country:
    Australia
    Just two things I'll quickly comment on.

    Firstly, the multiuse of a PC. When people bring up the fact that a PC costs more, I always wonder, how many people with $600 to spend on a console don't already own a PC? If you are buying a PC anyway, the extra cost to make it a gaming rig should be the comparative price to a console, not the entire PC. (It may still come to more than the console itself...)

    Secondly, "I have opposable thumbs and a brain that wastes a serious bit of energy for a reason." Most people would be dumbfounded by what they might need to do to fix issues. While I think that a lot of serious gamers would probably have no issues with this, it is a jump for those that can't do much on a PC without someone holding their hand. Just even step it up to editing the registry or any other manual editing, and you lose even people who can get by without too much trouble.
     
  12. Maikel Steneker

    Member Maikel Steneker M3 Fanboy

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,396
    Country:
    Netherlands
    I voted handheld. I have both handhelds and consoles, but handhelds seem to become better than consoles... And they're even more plug and play!
     
  13. FAST6191

    Reporter FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,747
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    With regard to fixing a PC I agree, I have quite regularly been called to fix trivial faults for people who can diagnose and fix faults on machines far more complex than windows (or worse Word). Interesting analogy on the price issue though, never heard it termed like that before.

    Also, I has never been an issue before really but how many people need to tack on several hundred currency of choice for a "HD" TV these days.
    And of course you have the usual:
    controller x3 (assuming you get one) maybe with extra junk: wireless, rumble, power packs
    memory card x a few (as they are fairly proprietary you can bet that "huge" 16 meg card will cost you several tens of the price of a USB/cf/SD memory equivalent: anyone remember the PS1 memory card bundled with a magazine a few years back).
    cable related expenses (controller extensions, RCA/Scart/RF: you can almost bet that machine does not have what you want, SP-Dif, HDMI.......). Network cables including routers and such these days as well.
    headsets seem of some importance of late as well.
    Coupled with the network above I suppose I better add xbox live (with the exception of the DC, DS and PSP who really uses/used any of the other consoles offerings), that costs as well, hold on I have to renew my subscription to Unreal, oh wait.
    keyboard perhaps?
    Games are that little bit more as well, perhaps not important for the general readership here but for man in street (which I sense is the angle most are going for here) at the cost of 3 or 4 audio cds (at least until price drops and second hand) it can get nasty.

    If anyone can tell me this bunch of stuff is not a) overpriced and b) "necessary" at some point (ever been round someones house who does not have a similar setup to this/yours or even had a better setup than yourself).

    Just as a final thought: my own music (should I want any) is quite easy to have with a PC game, most other times I have to resort to hacking to get what I want (not normally an "easy" option) or an external source.
     
  14. jimmy j
    OP

    Member jimmy j Awesome for hire.

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    894
    Location:
    the congo
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    PlayStation World #1. I loved that mag!

    Fingers crossed for a 360 memory card on the cover of OXM [​IMG]
     
  15. Takeshi

    Member Takeshi GBAtemp Addict

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,946
    Country:
    Germany
    I voted for handhelds, as they just seem to suit me better and because I'm owning a lot more of them than TV-consoles. But i also like console gaming. The only games I play on PC/Mac are either ScummVM driven or sometimes emulated. [​IMG]
     
  16. nephdj

    Member nephdj GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    442
    Country:
    Australia
    PC

    I dont read into the whole "600 dollar video card" stuff, as my 6800 ultra was $100 2nd hand [​IMG] plays most games on medium at a high frame rate

    but my handheld is used for being on the train everyday to collage [​IMG]
     
  17. AWESOME_noob

    Member AWESOME_noob GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    266
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Voted PC cos its the MOST backwardly compatible gaming platform- therefore the biggest range/variety of games available...as well as emulators
     
  18. fischju_original

    Banned fischju_original I used to be a jerk before i got banned

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,014
    Country:
    United States
    PC is the best, no doubts. You can play with anything a console can (same controllers) on any TV a console can. There are many more games for PCs, and the extra cost is worth it. For $1200 you can make a PC with better graphics than the PS3, but can do everything else a PC can. But I don't really see a reason to say all of that. All I need to say is:

    Half-Life 2 in 1280x1024 with the graphics turned ALL the way up
     
  19. legendofphil

    Member legendofphil Phil no Densetsu

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,214
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I wouldn't vote any of them, owning a high end PC, Wii, 360 and DS, I would say that there are pros and cons to each.
    Certain games I prefer on the each.
    Such as:
    FPS - PC
    3D Platform - Console
    Puzzle - Handheld.
     
  20. xcalibur

    Member xcalibur Gbatemp's Chocolate Bear

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,166
    Location:
    Sacred Heart
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Its not a question, everyone here has a cmputer so it wins by default [​IMG]
    Seriously though, pc gamers and console gamers are two different breeds.
    Console games is much more casual than PC gaming since online connectivity and competition has been a part of it since a loooong time. Its only beng standerdised now in the console community.
    Console have much more variety though, out of the thousands of pc games, none feature much difference. Innovation? Yes, Uniqueness? NO!
    Yet for consoles and handhelds its a lot different.
    In the end, its just like music and books, its only your personal preference which matters

    I chose consoles btw, Guitar Hero FTW
     

Share This Page