Chronicle star playing Harry Osborne

Discussion in 'Books, Music, TV & Movies' started by Hyro-Sama, Dec 3, 2012.

  1. Hyro-Sama

    Hyro-Sama I'm from the fucking future.

    Oct 25, 2009
    After Earth
  2. Gahars

    Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Aug 5, 2011
    United States
    New Jersey
    Chronicle was really, really good. The Amazing Spider-Man... wasn't.

    I'm conflicted.
  3. wrettcaughn

    wrettcaughn Misunderstood Moral Elitist

    Mar 14, 2009
    United States
    The Amazing Spiderman was a hell of a lot better than Raimi's trilogy...and I'm a huge Raimi fan.
  4. Guild McCommunist

    Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    May 6, 2009
    United States
    The Danger Zone
    The Amazing Spiderman wasn't amazing?

    Shame on you for a missed joke.

    Worth watching.
    Gahars likes this.
  5. Hyro-Sama

    Hyro-Sama I'm from the fucking future.

    Oct 25, 2009
    After Earth
    Jamie Foxx has been confirmed as the Villain for the sequel.

  6. AlanJohn

    AlanJohn くたばれ

    GBAtemp Patron
    AlanJohn is a Patron of GBAtemp and is helping us stay independent!

    Our Patreon
    Jan 6, 2011
    Canada,New Jersey
    Having Harry in the franchise won't be so bad.
    I think they're planning on making the goblin a villain in the third movie.
  7. Janthran

    Janthran Solarian

    Sep 17, 2011
    United States
    The Pacific Northwet
    I liked Spiderman.
  8. Nathan Drake

    Nathan Drake Obligations fulfilled, now I depart.

    Jan 2, 2011
    Hitting the actual topic first, I honestly don't know who Dane DeHaan is, but people seem to like him and support the choice. Looking at him, he looks like he'll make at least a physically accurate Harry. Looking at the cast list, Mary Jane is also being introduced in this movie, which should be interesting. If things go the way I think they will, the spotlight won't be on her long before this series if movies is up. Gwen Stacey seems to be the gal for this, trilogy I'd guess, though I'm not sure about the number of movies.

    Anyways, Jamie Foxx should do well. He's already shown in movies such as Law Abiding Citizen (which is excellent as long as you don't let the critics form your opinion [audience reception is quite good]) that he can do a serious role well, and if you saw Horrible Bosses, you saw he can also be comedic if they decide to add any of that cheesy comic, super villain flair. He's not a horrible actor, yet you act like you could think of a million better people to stick in the role.

    I personally found The Amazing Spider-Man to be a good movie. It beat the previous trilogy (though I still give credit to the second movie for easily being the best of the three), and was closer to the comics (yay web shooters!). The new Peter is just the right kind of awkward, and they did a good job not making him a straight up pretty boy in the movie. Emma Stone is fun to look at and fills her role well, and I thought the film as a whole was well done. I'm certainly looking forward to the next movie.
  9. gokujr1000

    gokujr1000 GBAtemp Advanced Maniac

    Oct 10, 2008
    Too many loose ends and plot holes in the first Amazing Spider-Man for me to enjoy it. I know Sony did an extreme amount of cutting and editing to make the movie a little more basic. If only it really did tell the untold story that they seemed to advertise everywhere.

    About the chronicle guy I think he played the dark, angry and confused character well which is probably why he was chosen to play Harry in the sequel.

    Also I think the fact that Harry is going to be Spider-Man 2 pretty much confirms that his father, Norman, will be in the movie as well.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice