- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 472
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Canada. Shieeet
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 226
- Country
This is the first step of many of which China will take over the world!
BTW, I'm Chinese. AZN PRIDE!
BTW, I'm Chinese. AZN PRIDE!
To be honest, there are countries far worse than China. They may not be in the best place right now for human rights, but they're far from the worst. Just check North Korea, that living hellhole is about a hundred times worse than China is.ollepoll said:I think china is the worlds worst country to live in;
no right to say anything, no right to do anything
LOL what are you talking about, they'd just propose a bill to allow it, making it quite public... oh wait, you mean they already did?Arctic said:China is more powerful then you think. Also, I'm sure the United States does this kind of stuff, you just don't hear about it because they hide it better.
Really, how many countries sentence people to re-education camps for something trivial that the party disagrees with? Such as this case.CarbonX13 said:To be honest, there are countries far worse than China. They may not be in the best place right now for human rights, but they're far from the worst. Just check North Korea, that living hellhole is about a hundred times worse than China is.ollepoll said:I think china is the worlds worst country to live in;
no right to say anything, no right to do anything
I'm pretty sure all governments keep their dirty stuff undercover obviously or no one would live there. And i'm kind of offended by your statement for some reason...ollepoll said:I don't even wanna know how many things the american do.Overlord Nadrian said:China = win.
you=spam?
I think china is the worlds worst country to live in;
no right to say anything, no right to do anything
that's all communist countries not just china.
@people taliking about nukes/ you guys act like the nuke is a boundary thing where it won't pass a certain line or border in this case XP.
QUOTE(ollepoll @ Nov 17 2010, 07:14 PM)
Maybe all these videogames made me paranoid, but I think that america does so much illeagal and undercover, wikileaks hasn't released 0,1% of the cruelity the american state does.
offtopic: Why is there no videogame where you play against china yet?
gamefreak94 said:@people taliking about nukes/ you guys act like the nuke is a boundary thing where it won't pass a certain line or border in this case XP.
ollepoll said:I don't even wanna know how many things the american do.
Maybe all these videogames made me paranoid, but I think that america does so much illeagal and undercover, wikileaks hasn't released 0,1% of the cruelity the american state does.
offtopic: Why is there no videogame where you play against china yet?
I'm pretty sure all governments keep their dirty stuff undercover obviously or no one would live there. And i'm kind of offended by your statement for some reason...
CoD BO you play in China in one level. And one of the most common games ever Dynasty Warriors Chinese vs Chinese.
Anyways, what game is there that plays against other countries other than the FPS games?
ever heard of strategy games?
and I think that a nuke would only destroy the main city and maybe everything in ~200km around, so it will mostly stay in the country
I think china is the worlds worst country to live in;PharaohsVizier said:QUOTE(ollepoll @ Nov 17 2010, 09:47 AM)
no right to say anything, no right to do anything
Wouldn't you want to live in the country that is able to do kind of thing?
ollepoll said:offtopic: Why is there no videogame where you play against china yet?
There is, Command & Conquer Generals
It's an RTS of the USA vs China vs Middle East
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_%26_Conquer:_Generals
QUOTE(SamAsh07 @ Nov 19 2010, 01:01 PM) Let the nuke wars begin!!! (Lives in middle-east, so is safe)
QUOTE said:"Yesterday, we discussed what most of the world's major media outlets were reporting on China's April 2010 hijack of '15% of Internet traffic,' including sensitive US government and defense sites. The alarm came following a US Government report (see page 244) on China / US economic and security relations released on Tuesday. Unfortunately, few bothered with fact checking or actually reading the report. The actual study never makes any estimate of Internet traffic diverted during the hijack — it only cites a blog post to suggest large volumes of traffic were involved. And curiously, the cited blog at the heart of the report never mentions traffic at all — only routes. You have to go to an interview with a third-party security researcher in a minor trade magazine to first come up with the 15% number (and this article never explains where the number came from). In a review of real data and actual facts, Arbor Nework's Craig Labovitz has a blog post looking at the traffic volumes involved in the incident (only a couple of Gigabits per second, or a 'statistically insignificant' percentage of Internet traffic)."
Pingouin7 said:Lol McAfee.
Can't they just use quotes from people from better anti-viruses?