Since when was there a rule that says teams can't get creative with their plays?Blood Fetish said:This seems like an abuse of the rules. Exploiting a technical loophole, because they are too afraid of matching skill against the other team. The coach should be fired for teaching this "lesson" to his team.
Blood Fetish said:This seems like an abuse of the rules
Everyone (including the referee) thought the play was dead, and they continued on a technicality. Who cares about the spirit of the rules? You would make an awesome lawyer.monkat said:Isn't that the point of rules in a game?
Don't let them restrict you, take advantage of them.
Also, shutup.
Blood Fetish said:Everyone (including the referee) thought the play was dead, and they continued on a technicality. Who cares about the spirit of the rules? You would make an awesome lawyer.monkat said:Isn't that the point of rules in a game?
Don't let them restrict you, take advantage of them.
Also, shutup.
Also, have a nice day.
Blood Fetish said:You would make an awesome lawyer.
I live in the US, and when I first clicked on this thread I expected another European flopping around on the ground.Shinigami357 said:Oh... AMERICAN Football.
I'd love to see ANY quarterback in the NFL get creamed while trying to pull of the ol' "It's the wrong ball, coach" play!ACDCGAMER said:Holy crap. The Rams better check this out.
Aww, c'mon. The quarterback is the only "actor" here as he is the one that "sold" the play. The offensive line never flinched and performed that snap like any other play; there's the talent part (a missed assignment there would have resulted in an "offsides" call.) True it wasn't as "flashy" as a double-end-around, but there is definitely a commitment to protocol on behalf of the offensive line that in my opinion is a collaboration of talents.Sefi said:Creative and sneaky, but I'd rather see a trick play that involves actual talent.