OK I have a lot to say on this topic, but really what bugs me is the forbidden XBOX360 core vs wii comparison. I know, I know, it's old hat but hear me out.
I thought the BIG difference between wii and 360/ps3 is the power difference. Nintendo has time and time again said they have underpowered the wii because graphics arent what they are aiming for. Well, if that's the case, how can their price for their "core" system (japanese=$215), seem that amazing? I dunno...I'm sure if you counted up all the parts between 360 and the wii, the 360 has way more hardware for only $85 more. Just considering processing power, the 360 has TWO processors that if i'm not mistaken are way more powerful on their own than the wii's processor.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say I think the 360 is a better deal, because I like the Wii much more. But playing devil's advocate, how is an $85 dollar difference indicative of the difference in hardware costs? Is Microsoft selling cores at such a loss, and Nintendo selling Wiis at equal to hardware costs or at a profit that there is only an $85 difference between the systems?
I ask this question because I really do not have a clue, so by all means if anyone knows how to do the math between hardware costs/selling prices then tell us where that $85 difference comes from. This is the reason why I expected the Wii to sell at $199, bundles or not.
I thought the BIG difference between wii and 360/ps3 is the power difference. Nintendo has time and time again said they have underpowered the wii because graphics arent what they are aiming for. Well, if that's the case, how can their price for their "core" system (japanese=$215), seem that amazing? I dunno...I'm sure if you counted up all the parts between 360 and the wii, the 360 has way more hardware for only $85 more. Just considering processing power, the 360 has TWO processors that if i'm not mistaken are way more powerful on their own than the wii's processor.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say I think the 360 is a better deal, because I like the Wii much more. But playing devil's advocate, how is an $85 dollar difference indicative of the difference in hardware costs? Is Microsoft selling cores at such a loss, and Nintendo selling Wiis at equal to hardware costs or at a profit that there is only an $85 difference between the systems?
I ask this question because I really do not have a clue, so by all means if anyone knows how to do the math between hardware costs/selling prices then tell us where that $85 difference comes from. This is the reason why I expected the Wii to sell at $199, bundles or not.