Apple relents on Flash ban for iPhone/iPad/Touch

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by DSGamer64, Sep 11, 2010.

Sep 11, 2010
  1. DSGamer64
    OP

    Member DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    A cold cold place
    Country:
    Canada
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20015954-264.html

    Four and a half months after an Apple license change led Adobe Systems to scrap a project to bring Flash-derived applications to the iPhone, Apple has reversed the ban.

    Apple undid license restrictions for software developed for iOS devices on Thursday, saying it was taking developer feedback to heart. "We are relaxing all restrictions on the development tools used to create iOS apps, as long as the resulting apps do not download any code," Apple said in a statement.

    According to the developer agreement (PDF), Apple removed the extra words it had added to section 3.3.1 of that license in April that blocked the Flash-derived apps: "Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed by the iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code written in C, C++, and Objective-C may compile and directly link against the Documented APIs (e.g., Applications that link to Documented APIs [application programming interfaces] through an intermediary translation or compatibility layer or tool are prohibited)."

    Adobe, the major company affected by this change, was cautiously optimistic. "We are encouraged to see Apple lifting its restrictions on its licensing terms, giving developers the freedom to choose what tools they use to develop applications for Apple devices," the company said in a statement. And the stock market was quick to take notice of the change in fortunes, pushing Adobe shares up about 12 percent in morning trading.

    What comes next for Adobe is somewhat unclear, but it seems at a minimum that Flash-derived applications will stand on their own merits according to how well they work, not their programming origins.

    And Apple, with its control over the App Store distribution channel, still has plenty of leeway to bar what it doesn't like case by case. According to the new App Store Review Guidelines also released Thursday, "If your app doesn't do something useful or provide some form of lasting entertainment, it may not be accepted...We have lots of serious developers who don't want their quality apps to be surrounded by amateur hour."

    Some developers besides Adobe weren't happy with Apple's move in April. Jonathan "Wolf" Rentzsch was so discouraged by the situation concerning Apple's section 3.3.1 that in May he canceled a Mac developer conference as a result.

    Unity Technologies, which sells cross-platform developer tools to let programmers reach iOS and other devices, also came under a cloud in April, when Apple changed its policy. Although new Unity-created apps have continued to arrive in the App Store since then, Unity co-founder Nicholas Francis evidently was happy to see Apple's policy changed.

    "We applaud this move by Apple. We are all about enabling people to work with the best tools for any given job. Apple has always been focused on providing superior products to end users," Francis said. "Unity games have been continuously released throughout this period. However, we are very happy for all those developers who can now join the party."

    Another company in the same boat as Unity, Appcelerator, argued that Apple's move was wise because it helps foster developer innovation, strengthens Apple's iOS advantage in the long run, and ultimately "benefits consumers as the ultimate arbiters of quality in the App Store," the company said in a statement. "We're incredibly pleased with this morning's announcement," said Chief Executive Jeff Haynie. More than 4,000 iPhone and Android applications were built with Appcelerator.

    Apple didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. But one thing is clear: Adobe didn't come to its decision to scrap its Flash-to-iOS project lightly, and resurrecting it wouldn't be simple. Programmers would need to be retrieved from new projects, and resources would need to be reallocated for marketing, support, and developer relations to some degree.

    Adobe tried unsuccessfully for years to let Flash Player onto the iPhone and iPod Touch, a move that would have helped fulfill Adobe's cross-platform programming ambitions. Apple refused, though, so Adobe sidestepped the restriction by debuting software that would convert Flash apps into native iPhone apps.

    Adobe released the tool, part of Flash Professional CS5, at about the same time Apple released the iPad earlier this year. That's when the difference between the companies escalated to a very public battle.

    Apple changed terms of its iOS developer agreement to block Flash-derived apps, and even more publicly, Apple CEO Steve Jobs wrote a letter saying why the company spurned Flash.

    Adobe fought back with an ad campaign that asserted, "We love Apple," but it added, "What we don't love is anybody taking away your freedom to choose what you create, how you create it, and what you experience on the Web."

    In addition, Adobe loudly allied with Google, whose Android operating system is iOS' most direct competitor. New Android phones and tablets can run Flash Player 10.1, at least in theory letting owners of those devices tap into Flash-based Web sites, games, and applications that iOS users can't. Many Flash developers didn't create their projects with small touch-screen interfaces and feeble mobile-phone processors in mind, but some of those constraints are easing as mobile-device hardware gets steadily more powerful.



    I did not see it posted. Good news everyone!
     
  2. NDStemp

    Member NDStemp GBAtemp?! No! NDStemp

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    627
    Location:
    Canada, Ontario
    Country:
    Canada
    So...basically Apple regrets not taking Adobe?
     
  3. purplesludge

    Member purplesludge anyone have any ideas for this space

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,047
    Location:
    wv
    Country:
    United States
    I would say this is the main reason why.
    Android gained a lot of market share.
    It also has shown that flash can work on phones.
    It is a shame it took Apple this long after making some bs excuses.
     
  4. alidsl

    Member alidsl I am now a lurker

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,823
    Location:
    Kanto - Pallet Town
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Lol, I love comex so much [​IMG]
     
  5. SPH73

    Banned SPH73 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    889
    Country:
    United States
    Apple is a joke. [​IMG]
     
  6. BakuFunn

    Member BakuFunn Flameproof.

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,174
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Apple is not allowing Flash to the iPhone, it's allowing the use of other tools to create applications for iOS, such as Adobe's tools or Unity.
    I'm sure that Apple still hates Flash for the same reasons as before: Adobe is sloppy. Have you ever used Flash on OS X? It's not fun. Apple merely thinks that when Adobe does such a horrendous job on OS X, they'll fuck up again on iOS.

    I find it entertaining that everybody cries bigotry when Apple disallows Flash, but twists the offensive when Apple takes it back.

    EDIT: Critical errors in spelling.
     
  7. Hellow

    Member Hellow GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    174
    Location:
    brighton, south australia
    Country:
    Australia
    They really are! i just bought an album and hav tried to download it but the songs keep getting an error 99% through the download........ and theyre telling us its better to buy music then illegally download it.... hah
     
  8. BakuFunn

    Member BakuFunn Flameproof.

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,174
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Those recording labels are jokes too, then. They try to sell us music in CDs! Overpriced! So is Sony with their download service. (Oh no, DRM, gasp.)
    I guess the only great companies are the ones that give you free stuff and aren't evil, or in your definition I assume is not out for money. (And therefore not a company.)
     
  9. TwinRetro

    Global Moderator TwinRetro Don't start nothin', Won't be nothin'

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,181
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Country:
    United States
    itt: Apple is allergic to money.
     
  10. BakuFunn

    Member BakuFunn Flameproof.

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,174
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Isn't that a good thing?
     

Share This Page