This ruling is freakin' hilarious BUT I think it should never have been made. I hate the constant Patent Wars being waged in the mobile computing field as much as any other but this ruling makes no sense and has no precedent. To my knowledge no other company has had to make public statements renouncing what they have said before. Why? Because losing the lawsuit should be enough. Apple don't run public slander campaigns against Samsung and others pointing out that they're stolen products the only people who see these crazy statements Apple have been making are watching tech sites and have seen that they lost the case. These public statements are going to hurt the company's other lawsuits all over the world. This is doing way too much harm to Apple as a company to be allowed to go through.
As for the copying: The front of tablets all look the same, yes. Why? All screens have some sort of bezel on them to hide wires. When you have a touchscreen device it looks a lot cleaner to have this bezel covered by the same glass. This is simply a design trend, not something that Apple can patent or say is directly copied. The back of the device looks different enough to me. As for the dock connector. I agree, its very similar to Apple's and possibly the most blatent act of copying in this suit but its not enough to cause irreparable damage to Apple's market share.
As for the copying: The front of tablets all look the same, yes. Why? All screens have some sort of bezel on them to hide wires. When you have a touchscreen device it looks a lot cleaner to have this bezel covered by the same glass. This is simply a design trend, not something that Apple can patent or say is directly copied. The back of the device looks different enough to me. As for the dock connector. I agree, its very similar to Apple's and possibly the most blatent act of copying in this suit but its not enough to cause irreparable damage to Apple's market share.