Alright...

Discussion in 'The Edge of the Forum' started by Fatal, Mar 31, 2007.

  1. Fatal
    OP

    Fatal Advanced Member

    Newcomer
    2
    Dec 5, 2006
    United States
    Code:
     Â Â Â Â Âx² - x² = x² - x²
    Â (x - x)(x + x) = x(x - x)
    Â -------------- Â----------
    Â Â Â (x - x) Â Â Â(x - x)
    Â Â Â Â Â(x + x) = x
    Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2x = x
    Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â2 = 1
    ...who broke the numbers?
     
  2. Swordmyth

    Swordmyth Banned

    Banned
    0
    Feb 11, 2007
    United States
  3. jumpman17

    jumpman17 He's a semi-aquatic egg laying mammal of action!

    Former Staff
    5
    Apr 11, 2003
    United States
    (x - x)(x + x) = x(x - x)

    Those aren't equal.
    It reads 2x = 0 which only would be true if x=0
     
  4. Shinji

    Shinji ҉҉ ҉҉

    Member
    3
    Nov 6, 2002
    United States
    City of Delusion
    I was going to make a comment, but my thoughts arent straight enough for it to make sense on a message board. The only thing that comes to might that DOES make sense is F.O.I.L.
     
  5. Fatal
    OP

    Fatal Advanced Member

    Newcomer
    2
    Dec 5, 2006
    United States
    (x -x)(x + x) is the same thing as 0(2x) which is equal to x(0) as both end up as 0. 0 = 0. It's a joke problem and isn't meant to be taken seriously as it's impossible to divide by zero.
     
  6. Icarus

    Icarus fire walk with me

    Member
    3
    Feb 3, 2006
    United States
    Big Appleu
    I've seen this a few years ago.
    This is simply called a paradox but there's still something wrong with it. In maths, the parentheses always have the priority so you have to solve them first before divinding (x-x)'s. And since x-x = 0 it's going to be 0 = 0
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice