Activision spent $100 million on Starcraft II development

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by Guild McCommunist, Jul 19, 2010.

  1. Guild McCommunist
    OP

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Source

    Damn. That's a lot. For reference, GTA IV is, as of now, the game with the highest development costs ever made (Shenmue is in second). This may soon beat it or at least tie it. Regardless, looks like Shenmue is going to #3.
     


  2. monkat

    Banned monkat I'd like to see you TRY to ban me. (Should I try?.

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,268
    Location:
    Virginia
    Country:
    United States
    Aaaaahhh shenmue...you were the final nail in sega's coffin, weren't you?
     
  3. Satangel

    Member Satangel BEAST

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,255
    Location:
    Bruges, Belgium
    Country:
    Belgium
    Hopefully it pays off, it's a big risk to make that kind of costs on a PC only game....
     
  4. Juanmatron

    Member Juanmatron Slater Color

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,667
    Location:
    SEGA's World
    Country:
    Spain
    More than Shenmue?
     
  5. IBNobody

    Member IBNobody I try to keep myself amused.

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,127
    Location:
    Texas, Hang 'Em High
    Country:
    United States
    It's a PC only game that can run on even lower end PC's. It's very deep and addictive. Its predecessor has a huge worldwide following. It's Korea's unofficial national sport.

    On the flip side... Who still talks about Warcraft 3?
     
  6. nutella

    Member nutella Low Glycemic Index

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,097
    Location:
    Your nearest supermarket
    Country:
    Australia
    ahh, they can easily make that back. everyone in korea is guaranteed to buy the game already.
     
  7. Master Mo

    Member Master Mo F.R.E.E.

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Man Mo Temple
    Country:
    Germany
    At least it was a diamond nail [​IMG]

    [​IMG] Shenmue [​IMG]

    It shows, that Activision is passionate about the title and also that they are sure about its commercial success! IMO not a bad thing at all...
     
  8. bazzi_h

    Member bazzi_h GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    125
    Location:
    Portmouth
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I call bull sh**
     
  9. .Chris

    Member .Chris Pffft.

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,182
    Location:
    United States
    Country:
    United States
    yeah
     
  10. Scott-105

    Member Scott-105 Bow to me. Please?

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,943
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Country:
    Canada
    If they did spend that much, it should be a really good game.
     
  11. .Chris

    Member .Chris Pffft.

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,182
    Location:
    United States
    Country:
    United States
    i guess so
     
  12. Splych

    Member Splych GBAtemp's Lurker

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,953
    Location:
    Canada, Ontario.
    Country:
    Philippines
    no one i know .
    my cousins play it from time to time (more like DoTA).
    that's all Warcraft is known for to me xD.
     
  13. BakuFunn

    Member BakuFunn Flameproof.

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,174
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Screw Activision. They didn't do shit.
    Blizzard made it happen. Activision just corrupted Blizzard like hell, just developing that World of WarCrap. They scrapped Ghost for WoW, and guess why Diablo III is in such slow development with barely any attention. Activision bought Blizzard and showed Blizzard what money is like. Now, all Blizzard does is spend most of their man-hours to develop on that piece of crap. They killed Blizzard. Why does Battlenet 2.0 not have chat channels? LAN? What's with the stupid unnecessary Facebook integration? All to appeal to the mass consumer, all Activision's doing. They wanted to create a more user-friendly network, so they scrapped chat channels. Fuck. They wanted to eliminate every form of piracy (which will never happen anyways) so they took away LAN. Double fuck. Then, their craptastic ladder system pits C- iccup players in the Diamond league, letting them cheese away.

    Well, I have to give it to Activision for giving Blizzard all this money to develop games.

    That 60$ for StarCraft II isn't that hard to justify now, is it?



    By the way, it's a great game.


    EDIT: Less Activision hate, more truth.
     
  14. Ferrariman

    Member Ferrariman Hip-Flop and cRap

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,357
    Location:
    Canader.
    Country:
    Canada
    Korea's gonna be all over this shit.
     
  15. DSGamer64

    Member DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    A cold cold place
    Country:
    Canada
    No, SC2 won't run on lower end computers. The game is hardware intensive, especially online playing where you can lag a lot, I had to run the beta at medium to not experience frame drops. And a lot of people still talk and play WC3, especially for the DOTA mod.

    People also need to consider that a portion of this game development budget has been sunk into the Battle.net system and the whole online play that Blizzard has had to create for it. This game will feature more online options, as well as a communication system that will allow you to talk to friends in either Diablo 3 or World of WarCraft. Blizzard has sunk a ton of cash into the online upgrades and I am sure there will be far more features then what I have seen in the beta. There will be player ratings and probably different styles of games just like the original.
     
  16. DSGamer64

    Member DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    A cold cold place
    Country:
    Canada
    Yeah, Diablo 3 won't get worked on until the other games Blizzard is developing are finished, so it isn't Activisions fault that WoW's expansion and SC2 were priority, especially from a financial gains perspective. No doubt once SC2 is done that team will move on to progress Diablo 3 more though. Kinda hard to make 3 really big games all at once ya know. You also have to consider that there are 2 extension games for SC2 that will be in the works as well for Zerg and Protoss campaigns to be released later, I am sure the core SC2 team will be working on those once with Battle.net system is running and SC2 is off the ground.
     
  17. Guild McCommunist
    OP

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    I said Shenmue was already beaten by GTA IV. Shenmue cost roughly $70 million to make (this included the sequel as well); GTA IV cost $100 million. This is about on-par with GTA IV.
     
  18. naglaro00

    Member naglaro00 Mildly disturbed

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,381
    Location:
    Pulse
    Country:
    Philippines
    Stupid people on my country [​IMG]


    @the other guy: it runs on lower end PCs!? [​IMG]
     
  19. Theraima

    Member Theraima I own this desert, bitches!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Messages:
    700
    Location:
    Clouds
    Country:
    Finland
    No way Activision did anything in this. I just wont buy it. Blizzard did do it mostly, no doubt.


    I call bullshit too.
     
  20. updowners

    Member updowners lurklurklurk

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,323
    Country:
    Australia
    Too Human... But this is by Blizzard so I think it should be good even though I'm not in to RTS games.
     

Share This Page