Activision has possibly lost the James Bond license they're pulling games off online stores

Discussion in 'General Gaming Discussion' started by Lurker2, Jan 5, 2013.

  1. Lurker2
    OP

    Banned Lurker2 Banned!

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2012
    Messages:
    330
    Country:
    United States
    -
     
    Rasas likes this.


  2. EyeZ

    Member EyeZ GBAtemp Addict

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,336
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Yeah i read about this on eurogamer, they think it may be related to the poor sales of the James Bond games.

    If there not very good games it's to be expected that they won't sell.

    I've never been a fan of these James Bond games myself, so i won't lose any sleep over this.
     
  3. ShadowSoldier

    Member ShadowSoldier GBAtemp Guru

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    9,383
    Country:
    Canada
    Good. Activision and EA has both screwed up the Bond name for games. On the N64, it felt like I was actually playing Bond. With these games, it felt like a generic title. Maybe that will teach Activision to not rush shit anymore.

    Personally, I would LOVE to see Retro studios pick this up. I can see them doing a fantastic job.
     
    Ron, gamefan5, Celice and 2 others like this.
  4. FAST6191

    Reporter FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,719
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Interesting- I wonder what their distribution contracts were like if they are bothering to pull things.

    As for N64 being the last one I will defend nightfire long and hard on the "felt like bond front" and it even had a nice little multiplayer when it came down to it.
     
    wrettcaughn, Celice and Catastrophic like this.
  5. ShadowSoldier

    Member ShadowSoldier GBAtemp Guru

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    9,383
    Country:
    Canada
    Oh shit I forgot about that game. Yeah that one was good, I only thought of Agent Under Fire.
     
  6. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Rumor has it that Activision is prematurely dropping their licensing rights to Bond and can no longer distribute them.

    I enjoyed the new Goldeneye and I thought Blood Stone was alright. Quantum wasn't bad either. I don't think anything will live up to the Nightfire golden days but they're just games of an older era that wouldn't really age or appeal much to a newer age.

    Still I'd hope the franchise lives on. There's a lot of potential in the IP. Personally I'd like an Alpha Protocol type game but for Bond instead of Generic Male Spy #1.
     
  7. soulx

    Member soulx GBAtemp Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    10,130
    Country:
    Canada
    Goldeneye 007 was pretty damn good although I hear Legends was crap.

    Honestly I would be down for a Bond game in the style of Rocksteady's Batman games. The right mix of action and stealth.
     
  8. Gahars

    Member Gahars Bakayaro Banzai

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,254
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Country:
    United States
    Seeing how 007 Legends turned out... yeah, it might be best if James Bonds with another publisher.
     
  9. ShadowSoldier

    Member ShadowSoldier GBAtemp Guru

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    9,383
    Country:
    Canada
    Honestly, 007 should never have gone to Activision in the first place. With the number of titles that have been released between the two, Activision and EA have only manage to pump out 2 good 007 games combined. That's just sad. I would love to see 007 games be prominent and have a big fanbase and be big releases instead of just "oh yeah, this is coming out too" titles.
     
  10. FAST6191

    Reporter FAST6191 Techromancer

    pip
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,719
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Though I did not dislike the gameplay and thought some of the underlying design was inspired I would probably not have played it were it not for the branching story and decisions aspect. Saying that "you can pick from the styles of any of the classic bonds" could do well.
     
  11. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    I don't see why people put the original Goldeneye up on such a pedestal other than "nostalgia". There's been much better FPS games since then and even if you wanted a contemporary, Perfect Dark came out a few years later on the same system and was thoroughly better. Nowadays you can play Perfect Dark's HD port with all the Goldeneye maps and weapons. How about that.

    EA made some pretty decent games when they had the license. Nightfire was spectacular, Agent Under Fire was good (a lot of fans are usually torn between those two), Everything or Nothing was pretty good as well. From Russia With Love was kinda meh but certainly not terrible. Under Activision, Quantum of Solace wasn't bad, especially for a movie tie-in, the Goldeneye reboot was actually quite fun (I think people put a lot of hate on it for being Activision and because it, god forbid, has some CoD aspects in it). Blood Stone was alright, probably From Russia With Love level. But generally the franchise has fared decently, more so than most movie-to-video game franchises.
     
  12. xwatchmanx

    Member xwatchmanx GBAtemp's (Un)Ironic Weeaboo

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    6,310
    Location:
    Pittsboro, NC
    Country:
    United States
    Because God forbid someone DARE to like a game because of the nostalgia factor, right? That's such an objectively terrible reason to like a game, right?
     
  13. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    Well I just find too many people prop up an unexciting game because of "nostalgia". I just get sick of the "nostalgia-tinted spectacles" look on everything.

    It could also be because of Reddit and how literally 1/2 of r/gaming posts are "LOL LOOK AT THIS NOSTALGIA".
     
  14. xwatchmanx

    Member xwatchmanx GBAtemp's (Un)Ironic Weeaboo

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    6,310
    Location:
    Pittsboro, NC
    Country:
    United States
    But why does it matter? As long as someone genuinely likes a game, does it matter what the reason is?

    I mean, I can understand your stance when it comes to hipsters who never ever played a game back in the day, and praise it because "it's older and nostalgic, therefore better." Id est, if I said that, since I've never played Goldeneye except for 5 minutes on an emulator, then yeah, that would be me just being a hipster. But if someone genuinely enjoyed it back in the day, and still enjoys it largely for all the great memories they have of it (whether they do this consciously or unconsciously), I don't see why it's a bad thing.

    And just because you don't find a game exciting doesn't mean it objectively isn't so. That's your opinion, same as other people have an opinion that it's a great game. Good for you, good for them. Leave it at that. I don't understand why that's so hard for you to fathom when it comes to games you don't care about (as evidenced in many other threads).
     
  15. DSGamer64

    Member DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    A cold cold place
    Country:
    Canada
    Nightfire was the last good Bond game to be honest. The Goldeneye remake for the Wii was a bastardized homage towards the original and the 360 and PS3 versions were garbage too. All they did was changed the level designs, and horribly at that, just so that the game felt longer. What made Goldeneye great in the first place was it's fun factor and replayability, as well as the multiplayer because the levels were designed to fit both styles of play well. Part of the problem is that Bond games have pretty much become exactly like every other shooter on the market and there is nothing fun or interesting about them aside from a few Bond gadgets. Activision and EA treated them exactly like every other movie tie in game that has ever been developed, and that is badly. Ubisoft would probably be the next publisher to pick up the game license unless Nintendo thinks they can do a good job and make a Wii U exclusive and authentic remake of Goldeneye through one of their second party studios.
     
  16. Guild McCommunist

    Member Guild McCommunist (not on boat)

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,151
    Location:
    The Danger Zone
    Country:
    United States
    I'll admit I'm a bit biased towards the "nostalgia lovers" because of some of the people I have known and seeing a lot of obnoxious Reddit posts related to that, so just keep that in mind during this post.

    Generally I just find nostalgia a kinda silly notion. Like it sometimes lets bad games live beyond what they deserve or a lot of people will block out newer advancements or just plain rage at newer advancements. Like some people will see a newer game in a franchise and just go "THIS IS KILLING MY CHILDHOOD" or some bullshit. Or they'll keep bugging people about an older game that wasn't quite good.

    A good example for me personally is Glover. I played the game a lot as a kid but the game was shit. My friend played it as well and we both know it was shit. We don't really view it nostalgically, at least not in a good light. A lot of others though would say "I LOVED GLOVER" or "GLOVER WAS MY CHILDHOOD" and then wank on about how we need a Glover sequel or something.

    In the case of Goldeneye, it means a lot of people are just plain ignorant to other Bond entries with the whole "NOTHING BEATS GOLDENEYE IT WAS MY CHILDHOOD" point of view. I'd say Nightfire was better, Agent Under Fire was better, even the Goldeneye reboot was better.

    I'm just saying nostalgia is just as bad a bias as any other type and, like any other bias, it leads to a lot of ignorance.
     
    wrettcaughn, gamefan5 and xwatchmanx like this.
  17. xwatchmanx

    Member xwatchmanx GBAtemp's (Un)Ironic Weeaboo

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    6,310
    Location:
    Pittsboro, NC
    Country:
    United States
    I can respect, and to an extent, agree with that.
     
  18. Jayro

    Member Jayro MediCat DVD Developer

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,377
    Location:
    Octovalley
    Country:
    United States
    That's because Goldeneye on the N64 wasn't rushed, it was polished. A very good game with great graphics, solid linear gameplay, and a fantastic multiplayer mode. Alot of people (including myself) still hold all other Bond shooters up to this standard, and are constantly let-down in disappointment. :/ I was REALLY sad when the 360 version of Perfect Dark bombed. I had such high hopes for that game. The one and only time Rare has ever let me down.
     
  19. xwatchmanx

    Member xwatchmanx GBAtemp's (Un)Ironic Weeaboo

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    6,310
    Location:
    Pittsboro, NC
    Country:
    United States
    Are you sure about that?
     
  20. Jayro

    Member Jayro MediCat DVD Developer

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    3,377
    Location:
    Octovalley
    Country:
    United States
    I never played Nuts and Bolts, so I wouldn't know first-hand. And I found Jet-Force Gemini a bit frustrating in difficulty.
     

Share This Page