Activision CEO Bobby Kotick subpoenaed, US government now involved in misconduct investigation

asdasdasdsda.png

Things are heating up again in the latest addition to the Activision Blizzard saga. A few months ago, the state of California filed a lawsuit against Activision, following reports of sexual misconduct, worker discrimination, and "rampant frat boy workplace culture". Since then, the company has been dealing with the ongoing investigation and trying to placate upset fans, by patching content in certain games or renaming Overwatch's McCree, who was named after a former Blizzard employee that has since been fired, following those allegations.

Now, things have extended to the federal level, as the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is involving itself. The Wall Street Journal has reported that the SEC has begun its own investigation into Activision Blizzard's workplace harassment claims. The SEC has subpoenaed CEO Bobby Kotick, among other employees, for documents involving meetings, correspondence, and other relevant information regarding how Activision handled reports of harassment and discrimination.

:arrow: Source
 

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
30,938
Trophies
2
Age
36
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,385
Country
United States
Hopefully it doesn't drag on and its just resolved quickly, these things can become a farce.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


Why do you think this? If Activision decides to just sell everything, Microsoft would be in the best position to pick it up.. but that's a huge if.
Better them than the shitbrained Activision who only focuses on boring COD
 

CTR640

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
385
Trophies
0
XP
1,235
Country
Netherlands
Actishit Bizzard is a bunch of human scum. Do they treat their mothers like how they treat the female workers?

I'm still curious, will they get dragged to the court because of not being really honest about stocks? Or also because of their behavior towards women?
 

raxadian

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
3,255
Trophies
1
Age
39
XP
3,048
Country
Argentina
Why do you think this? If Activision decides to just sell everything, Microsoft would be in the best position to pick it up.. but that's a huge if

Cause Sony is also in the buying game studios game and they already got Rachet and Clank as exclusives.

So it makes sence to also get Spyro and Crash, more Crash that Spyro at least.
 

CoolMe

...
Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
1,117
Trophies
1
Age
26
XP
1,681
Country
United States
Refreshing to see that this kind of stuff gets taken seriously.. I hope the Crash/Spyro franchises somehow benefit from this, by either bringing a new CEO that gives them the proper treatment or selling the rights to their true owners *ND*..
 

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
30,938
Trophies
2
Age
36
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,385
Country
United States
Refreshing to see that this kind of stuff gets taken seriously.. I hope the Crash/Spyro franchises somehow benefit from this, by either bringing a new CEO that gives them the proper treatment or selling the rights to their true owners *ND*..

Keep them on Nintendo consoles too, no reason for Sony to use the exclusivity BS
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolMe

CoolMe

...
Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
1,117
Trophies
1
Age
26
XP
1,681
Country
United States
Keep them on Nintendo consoles too, no reason for Sony to use the exclusivity BS
Agreed. And we need a new Spyro game asap, and a Crash Bandicoot game like Twinsanity would be dope, inter-connected levels with hub areas to explore to shake up the already familiar/linear formula, so many possibilities...
 
Last edited by CoolMe,
  • Like
Reactions: the_randomizer
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • phalk @ phalk:
    I only do anything in my life to allow me to be lazier
    +1
    Gift
  • mr_switch @ mr_switch:
    same
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    TRJ, I learned all those in school/college.
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    As part of some course or other.
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I forgot to list Assembler, Pascal and Matlab scripting.
    Gift
  • phalk @ phalk:
    I know some pascal, c, php
    Gift
  • phalk @ phalk:
    and I'm a History teacher
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Went over the basics in all of them, never took it anywhere.
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I do use bash for my job though. It's useful.
    Gift
  • phalk @ phalk:
    Assembler is something I always wanted to learn
    Gift
  • phalk @ phalk:
    but.... nah
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    No point really.
    Gift
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Even the simplest device these days runs some sort of high level language.
    Gift
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @Veho all the IT stuff i've learned in school has been extremely basic... i knew most of it already
    Gift
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    it's better to learn on your own, it goes much faster than the snail pace they teach you at in school
    Gift
  • Coto @ Coto:
    assembly is actually great, gets you to run everything about 80% faster than C massaged code
    Gift
  • Coto @ Coto:
    assembler syntax is dead easy, but "how to put pieces together" logic requires to have in mind the original idea, and the CPU layout, and that's like double the work of C stuff. It's best to write C first, add some unit tests, then go assembly, then run the unit tests
    Gift
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    it can run faster than compiled code, but modern compilers are really good at optimization and you need to be even better at assembly to do a better job
    Gift
  • Coto @ Coto:
    with that all your assembler base will actually work
    Gift
  • Coto @ Coto:
    even on embedded systems, without a damned debugger
    Gift
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    syntax is easy but the code is hard to read, you can't look at a piece of code and expect to understand it without looking at all the code around it to see how it all works together so it takes much longer to read the code, it takes longer to write it too because what might be 1 line of code in C might be 20 lines of assembly
    Gift
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    the language is very simple to understand (because it's barely a language at all) understanding how all the instructions work together to form a whole is another matter, in general it's such a pain to work with that i would never recommend it unless you have a need for it. don't listen to this guy and learn assembly just because you want to make your code run faster, you are wasting your time, but if you run into a situation where your code isn't fast enough even after you enabled -Ofast and you NEED it to be faster, then you can consider assembly
    Gift
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @Coto have you tried -Ofast btw? ;)
    Gift
  • Gift
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I have o fast before but I suspect we are talking different Os lol
    Gift
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: I have o fast before but I suspect we are talking different Os lol