Devin said:Foxi4 said:QUOTE said:Anyways, I say go for it. Nothing wrong with porn anyways. It will probably prevent some fights and everything going on in the shower (if you know what I mean). Hell, they already get tv, and they get amazing dinners, and they get access to a gym, porn wouldn't do any bad to them.
This is the attitude that scares me the most. "They already have *stuff*, we can give them more *stuff*." No, we can't give them more stuff, they have too much stuff to begin with! It's a prison for god's sake - if you need to fap, fap to the bloody concrete wall because you are a prisoner in a detention center because you've been a NAUGHTY PERSON. They should NOT get anything unless they work towards getting it.
I agree. Also, we don't want to reward them too much as that may lead to people wanting to be there? Or have we already reached that point?
That point has been reached ages ago in Europe and it seems that the U.S is following the stupid, stupid example. In some countries the inmates can even have "private visits" in a "special room" when their girlfriends come over. What is this - a brothel or a prison?
How is it resocializing when the only thing that changes in life when you get time is that you're confined in a cell rather than an apparment that you had to pay for? Answer - it is not. You serve the inmates everything on a plate, the criminals are no longer *afraid* of the concept of imprisonment.
Prison should give the lowest possible living standards and reward only the inmates who actively work, unless they are unable to work due to old age or illnesses, but then again, what are they doing in a prison in the first place then? They should be in a specialized establishment.

