i think the moderator must be more strict because i see ''stupid'' message or pointless topic on the forum everyday so i suggest 3 stages for people making a ****----> insert bad word here.. of Gbatemp first time a advertissement 2nd time a suspend 3rd time ban...it's sample and i think many people will be more happy if some stupid people are ban Gbatemp will go further without people like that....
I like the scaled system idea (by the way, in English the word is Warning, but we understand your meaning well enough). The problem is in implication.
What defines a "stupid post"? What defines "Spam"? It's easy to generally set on a solution, but impossible to formally pin down the line between a good post and these warning areas.
[NOTE TO SELF: Stop yourself before this goes into another essay -- this sounds like one already.] [Reply to self: gotcha!]
Sounds like another matter of perspective. Mods don't suspend or ban unless it's required. I mean, the "when's the gba sp coming out" thread is easily answered by checking out the links on our news section or on ANY of it's topics where we generally discuss it, so does that make it a stupid post? There's also people who post things like
QUOTEI don't have a PS2 but my favourite game would be GTA:VC even though I haven't played the game before