I'm not sure I want to go through all his comments... but this is one place.This all doesn't belong in this thread anymore. Where did Foxi4 say the Switch draws Voltage? Voltage is supplied by the VRM's and it draws the current. It can, however, ask the VRM to supply a certain amount of Voltage. This is usually called the VID. That's not the point here, though, and neither is it mentioned anywhere.
You can't "draw the voltage you need at any given moment", you get the voltage you are given. You can draw the amps you need from it & you can ask a VRM to provide you more but that isn't what he says.Of course the voltage is dynamic - it’s load-dependent. The chip generally won’t draw more than it needs at any given moment. We’re talking strictly about peak usage here, but it’s good to narrow things down for everyone.
It needs more power. I won’t even address your PSU comment, input voltage is orders of magnitude higher than operating voltage, which you’d know if you either read my post or knew anything about the subject. Waste of time.Trolling as per usual.
I just don't have time to pull apart all your incoherent babble & nobody else can too.
My point is that overclocking causes the gates to switch quicker which requires more amps. The volts are set by what is producing the power. You have a hate boner for me, so you always try to contradict me. But if you have a psu providing 5v you can't suck 6v through because of an increased load.
You literally cannot disagree with this as it's basic physics.
Your wall of text is just pointless for everyone.
Again a non point because you're butt hurt.It needs more power. I won’t even address your PSU comment, input voltage is orders of magnitude higher than operating voltage, which you’d know if you either read my post or knew anything about the subject. Waste of time.
You're partly right, but Foxi4 is too. It is indeed load dependent. Now we're back at the VID. That's why, it asks for Voltage. But not like it draws it, no, it asks the VRM. The Switch however, is sort of an exception as the Voltage is pre-configured and when the load increases, the Voltage does too. So it can provide enough power. That's why it's dynamic. You're also partly right as "draw power" is a bit confusing if you're like a perfectionist. Still Foxi4 could be talking about current being drawn and not Voltage (which is a vague reference to current though as Foxi4 was talking about Voltage)I'm not sure I want to go through all his comments... but this is one place.
You can't draw the voltage you need, you get the voltage you are given. You can draw the amps you need from it & you can have something generate a different voltage to give to something else. But that is not what he says.
Thank you, and yes. Voltage on the rail is negotiated between the processor and the controller based on demand and achieved by switching the MOSFET. I believed some clarification was required in regards to how a VRM actually works since we’re talking about various hardware parameters like ratings which the average user may not understand. I think that purpose was achieved already, albeit in a lengthy fashion. Hey, more detail is more better. Tl;dr, voltage is dynamic and set by logic, current just flows, because that’s what it does. Nothing in a VRM circuit negotiates a specific level of current, current exists when there is a load. The chip “consumes” power, not voltage or amps, voltage and amperage are characteristics of electricity within a circuit.This all doesn't belong in this thread anymore. Where did Foxi4 say the Switch draws Voltage? Voltage is supplied by the VRM's and it draws the current. It can, however, ask the VRM to supply a certain amount of Voltage. This is usually called the VID. That's not the point here, though, and neither is it mentioned anywhere.
Agreed, now that the terms are relatively clear. If Switches are “popping” due to excessive current, it is generally advisable to know why it happens and what causes it.Unless there are some real reasons or things we're wrong about and should know, I suggest we stop this (pointless) discussion here. This is getting way off-topic.
I would be shocked beyond belief of average operating voltage if the SOC exceeded 1.5V, but I would have to check the X1 datasheet. Someone with more experience probing the rail could probably give us a more specific answer.Again a non point because you're butt hurt.
Go cry somewhere else.
Switch battery voltage is 3.7v, input voltage is 5V. operating voltage is orders of magnitute lower? Really? That is one low voltage system.
Thing is, what he's right about is stuff that is irrelevant to my original point.You're partly right, but Foxi4 is too.
orders of magnitude higher than 1.5v is at least 150v (you don't specify whether it's 2 or more). Nothing inside the switch could cope with that.I would be shocked beyond belief of average operating voltage if the SOC exceeded 1.5V, but I would have to check the X1 datasheet. Someone with more experience probing the rail could probably give us a more specific answer.
I corrected you because you were wrong. It has nothing to do with our, admittedly unpleasant, past encounters. I’m not petty.Thing is, what he's right about is stuff that is irrelevant to my original point.
He does it on purpose to derail any conversation I'm involved with and then acts all superior and insults me.
If he wasn't a jerk about it when he tries to correct a point he misunderstood then it would be a lot more pleasant around here.
If the supply voltage is 3.7V nominal, a peak of 1.5V on the rail is less than half that. On a GPU this is even more obvious since most modern cards operate on 12V input only, and buck down to the required 1-ish volts at the VRM.orders of magnitude higher than 1.5v is at least 150v (you don't specify whether it's 2 or more). Nothing inside the switch could cope with that.
Informative, I wasn’t exactly sure what the operating voltage of the SOC was in either iteration, so this helps with some basic napkin math. I’m not that interested in things that happened in the past myself, and I don’t hold grudges. I wouldn’t write several paragraphs of an explanation on how a VRM works, what components it consists of, what those components do in circuit and how that circuit is regulated if I did, my main objective is to keep the thread relatively informative and dispel various myths. One of the points of contention in the thread was that the average newbie won’t know that changing these settings will have consequences in regards to power delivery, and may cause it to exceed parameters it was designed and rated for. That’s true - it’s not just a number that you pick willy-nilly. As such, a more informative post was prudent, especially if I see claims that I’d consider at best incomplete.I have no idea what your past encounters are and I don't think it's going to make me neutral in who's right about what. GPU's (at least the desktop and laptop things) have lots of limits so they can't get past (mostly) 1.3V and software only allows up to about 1.2V as constant Voltage and just below 1.3V as peak/boost Voltage. The Switch's regulators only can supply up to about 1.525V. Where "only" is actually quite high. Erista goes up to like 1.2V-1.3V with overvolt (and if clocked very high 1.4V) iirc and Mariko 1.22V with overvolt and about 900-1000mV without. Not sure about non-overvolt Voltage for Erista.
Yes. Its mariko after all. Though the cooler is underwhelming. Im modding an erista cooler to fit into my oled.Did anyone test this with an oled switch yet? Is oled switch same as mariko? Get same result? Same powerdraw etc?
Nope only marikoIf I read this correctly it does NOT run on launch models, correct?
High clocks like this would damage Erista hw (and potentially mariko hw, a lot is still untested/unknown there), you wouldn't want to use them.If I read this correctly it does NOT run on launch models, correct?
I do want. believe me, in the dictionary among kamikaze there is a picture of meHigh clocks like this would damage Erista hw (and potentially mariko hw, a lot is still untested/unknown there), you wouldn't want to use them.