Hardware 3.16 Duo VS 2.4 Quad

Tylon

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
105
Trophies
0
Age
30
Location
Sweden
Website
Visit site
XP
198
Country
I'm planning to buy a new processor, and can't decide on what to buy... So I thought that I can ask my dear tempers for help!

Remember, I will only use the computer for gaming
 

xcalibur

Gbatemp's Chocolate Bear
Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
3,163
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Sacred Heart
XP
727
Country
Quad-core should be to Dual-core what Dual-core was to single core. You could do yourself a favor an adopt early but I really think that it'll be a while before dual-cores are obsolete. Most recent gams are optimized for dual cores too and its a lot cheaper so the best bet would be to go with the E8500.
E8400 is exactly the same but a bit underclocked. I suggest you get that and just OC it yourself.
 

Westside

Sogdiana
Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,904
Trophies
0
Age
35
Location
Guantanamo bay
Website
Visit site
XP
975
Country
Uzbekistan
Xcalibur said:
Quad-core should be to Dual-core what Dual-core was to single core. You could do yourself a favor an adopt early but I really think that it'll be a while before dual-cores are obsolete. Most recent gams are optimized for dual cores too and its a lot cheaper so the best bet would be to go with the E8500.
E8400 is exactly the same but a bit underclocked. I suggest you get that and just OC it yourself.
Actually E8400 is E8500 with less multipliers. E8500 has more overclocking potential, but not by much. With air cooling, the E8400 clocks up to 4.0GHz, with phase cooling (which costs a ridiculous $1500), it clocks up to 5.0GHz.

The Quad core is barely being adopted right now, most programs are single or dual core enabled. It may be a long while before we see alot of more than 2 thread enabled processes.
 

wohoo

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
490
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Uppsala
XP
859
Country
Why not get the quad-core and overclock it a bit yourself?
smile.gif


But in case of pure gaming the E8400 or 8500 (whatever) might be a better choice at the moment.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,284
Country
United Kingdom
The most cursory of searches says prices are near enough to consider equal (assuming the same mboard and all). Both are great processors and will overclock nicely.

Gaming, most games struggle to use 2 cores (most do not even have a worthwhile reason for directX10 yet) and while it is often down to the graphics card the cpu has been the limiting factor on more than a few occasions (my friends and I run SLI machines almost as standard). Extra clock is then pretty good.

I know you said gaming but,Video encoding (anything above about 1.5GHz (single core) and/or decent graphics is enough to handle nearly everything going when it comes to decoding if set up properly) is more inclined to use quad (if only in the split it into X part (where X is the amount of cores)). Clockspeed is still great (more video card encoders/APIs leave something to be desired and are consequently not used really beyond the "reference" encoders) but number of cores may just have the edge.

Basically go with the dual core.

@Westside search for the "wax" phase change cooling, liquid nitrogen is expensive but for most purposes "wax" works really well too (most implementations are not good enough for standalone but the extra cooling required is otherwise seen in 8 year old machines).
 

Javacat

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
323
Trophies
1
Website
Visit site
XP
298
Country
I had the same decision to make a few months ago and at the last minute changed from dual to quad core. They can overclock very nicely (not that you really need to) and although there aren't many programs designed for two or more cores, it means that you are able to run a few more CPU intensive apps at once.

+ no matter which one you choose, for the most recent games you'll probably find that the graphics card is the biggest bottleneck
 

fischju

Rehabilitated Jaywalker
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
1,937
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
54
Country
United States
My E8200 gets easily to 3.2ghz on stock voltage with stock hs/fan, and that makes it equal to the stock Q6600 in performance.
 

Zendrik

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
467
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Kissimmee, FL
Website
Visit site
XP
332
Country
United States
If you're tight on money, just get an E8400. Its a 2.4 Duo. I'm actually using an E4600 in my gaming rig and it is an awesome chip. Looking at the E8400, it looks spectacular. But like Westside said, most programs are still single/dual core oriented and won't take advantage of all four cores. But to be future proof, by all means, get one of the 45nm Core 2 Quads. I suggest the Q9300 or a Q9450(2.5 and 2.66 respectively). Personally, I'm looking into getting the Q9450 but funds are kinda tight right now, so I'll stick with the E8400
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: @salazarcosplay, Morning