Review cover Silicon Power P34A80 NVMe M.2 SSD (Hardware)
Official GBAtemp Review

Product Information:

Annoyed with long load times? An NVMe is good for what ails you. Especially when it comes at a good price.

attachFull207780

Just as solid-state drives began to replace traditional hard drives as the gaming go-to storage medium in the past, M.2 NVMe drives are now the gold standard for faster loading times compared to regular SSDs. Even consoles are touting the fact that short load times are one of the defining features of the next gaming generation, so why not ensure that your PC is ahead of the curve? If you're sick of continuous chunks of time being wasted by loading in your games, then an NVMe is the way to go.  

Coming from Silicon Power is the P34A80 M.2 drive. The brand itself is fairly new to the game, having been established in 2003, where they began their focus as a storage and memory-focused company. They're perhaps not mainstream enough to be recognizable in the Western market as competitors Samsung or Sandisk, but that's a shame, because they've got some interesting hardware in their lineup. One of which is, of course, that aforementioned NVMe. 

attachFull208222

Review image Review image Review image

Tech Specs
  • Dimensions: 22.0 x 80.0 x 3.5mm
  • Weight: 8g
  • Interface: PCIe Gen3x4
  • Performance Read(max.): up to 3,400 MB/s
  • Performance Write(max.): up to 3,000 MB/s
  • Operating Temperature: 0℃- 70℃
  • Shock Resistance Test: 1500G/0.5ms
  • Certification: CE/FCC/BSMI/Green dot/WEEE/RoHS/KCC
  • Warranty: 5 years

Testing the drive with various write/read benchmarks show that the P34A80 actually comes in quite comparable in stats to another NVMe previously reviewed here: the Cardea II. In random disk read tests, the Silicon Power drive performed admirably. In AS SSD, it also gave competitive results, especially given its price point. However, the read speeds are really where the drive shines, where it at times impressively outperformed higher-priced drives with its read scores. 

When it came to moving large amounts of small files, the P34A80 handled it with aplomb, speedily transferring game files from one M.2 to another. Results weren't half bad either when it came to larger files, but the drive seemed to struggle when it came to exporting video files or handling excessively large files, to the point of the drive heating up noticeably and files suddenly slowing. 

And, if you check Silicon Power's lifetime estimations for this drive, you might want to keep your file writing limited. They seem to give much smaller estimates of the drive's lifespan than other brands give theirs. It's hard to tell if they're just playing things safe without actually pushing the device to its limits and wearing it out. Regardless, you're probably not going to run into such issues any time soon, and Silicon Power's drives even come with a 5-year warranty, to cover any incidents. This should only be a concern if you're writing lots of large files on a constant basis, such as video editing; loading games or your OS from the drive is where this drive does its best work anyway. 

attachFull208215

Review image Review image

That being said, it's not the worst drawback, given everything else the drive has to offer. Normally, the P34A80 retails for about $129.99 (1TB model), which undercuts the price tags of similar mid tier NVMe drives, such as ones from Sabrent, WD, or Corsair. Going down to 256GB, the price comes out to a respectable $44.99, which really shows its value. Even then, if they were all evenly priced, Silicon Power still takes the win, with its impressive benchmarks and specs, which benefits from the fact that they used a Phison PS5012-E12 controller. 

But stats and benchmarks don't always dictate everything; how does the drive actually perform, compared to standard SATA SSDs or other NVMes? Well, I put it against two drives available to me: an HP EX900 NVMe, and a Crucial MX500. Loading up a save file for Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot took 7.8 seconds on the HP, 14.2 seconds on the Crucial, and 5.9 seconds with the Silicon Power. A beefier game like The Division 2 managed to load in 18.4 seconds for the HP, 32.9 seconds for Crucial, and 15.2 seconds for Silicon Power. Lastly, The Witcher 3 took 9.1 seconds with HP, 17.5 seconds with Crucial, and 8.7 seconds with Silicon Power.

The next time you want to upgrade your storage, or even jump into the new and exciting world of faster storage, it's well worth checking out what Silicon Power has to offer. Great performance coupled with an even greater price means you really can't go wrong with their selection of NVMes. 

Verdict

What We Liked ...
  • Good price/performance ratio
  • Lengthy warranty
  • Impressive speeds
What We Didn't Like ...
  • Product has a shorter lifespan than the competition
9.1
out of 10

Overall

Though you may be skeptical of Silicon Power's NVMe purely because the price makes it seem "too good to be true", their P34A80 drive manages to deliver on both price and performance. Given its low cost, you'll be hard-pressed to find a better deal.
gotta say, that test looks pretty basic

pretty standard

the nvme is fine, but i give your review 4/10

you know what you did wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stealphie
I got a adata nvme around this price last year, I think was advertised around 2800 instead of 3000, it seems to be at least as good as my Samsung ssd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chary
So you're doing a review but tell us readers to check for the TBW ourselves =\

A quick Google states the company don't explicitly declare the TBW but on its Amazon page:
512GB = 800TBW
1TB = 1665TBW
2TB = 3115TBW

At 1TB and above it's even higher than drive like Samsung's 970 Pro at up to 1200TBW. Saying it's worse than its competitors but no examples of alternatives, really? 5 years warranty is quite a standard too, not like it's 10 years and more.

2/10 For your review, do provide more information on key advantages/disadvantages you emphasize on.

A review by Krista Noren? Yes. An Official GBAtemp Review? Don't. Hopefully not until you update it to be more informative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crea
Yeah, storage is so dull...except when it works intermittently or suddenly fails.

It would be interesting to know more about the true lifetime of the drive. Not just a single number from one diagnostic tool, but accumulated data from out in the wild of how large numbers of this vendor's drives live and die.

Ideally, this data would not come from Silicon Power itself. (One should not entrust a fox to look after the henhouse population.) How about at least 2 numbers: a mean lifetime under consumer workloads and standard deviation?

When SSDs were new everybody was all worried about reliability. There were big studies from monster companies who buy astronomical numbers of drives for their data centers. I think Arse Technica had a long read about SSD reliability a while back. The gist was that most SSDs lasted longer than expected. Mostly.

It would be nice to know whether there is any warning of impending data loss, either from media failure or firmware problems. I had a horrible msata Samsung SSD which silently corrupted itself whenever a non MSFT/AAPL operating system attempted trim. I guess that's how Samsung, err, supports FOSS. Eventually, I found out about workarounds--a kernel parameter you could set at boot to disable native command queueing-- for the trim problem for Linux. (I never reliably solved the TRIM corruption problem in FreeBSD.) You could tell there was a problem before too much data got mangled because the kernel ring buffer was full of disk errors.

The drive also ran super-hot (or incorrectly reported its temperature to smartmontools) and failed completely with no warning in less than 2 years of fairly light use in a home NAS. Maybe the high temp. (70C) was the warning.....
 
True, he could have cut the unnecessary blabber.

Provide a chart for the loading speed, TBW, warranty, value etc. and maybe briefly interpret it, instead of 5 lines telling readers to check out the spec themselves, right?? Even screenshots will do, but they don't even bother to resize them properly now.

A review can surely be concise and straight to the point, especially for tech product like this but the reviewer don't even bother to provide the key specifications of the product in review and chose to fill it with fillers. It's like those 20mins tech review on youtube for the sake of ad revenue when it can be done in like 10mins or less for common products like this one, except even worse when it talk about things like its impressive benchmark because of the usage of a particular controller, it undercut its rival price, it has much lower lifespan but provide nothing about the claims.

Would recommend videos from Dave Lee (under 10mins or around 5mins mostly) on youtube although it's video but it shows how someone can easily review commonly used tech products by nailing the key points consumers care about.

Yeah, it's just a storage medium in review, don't omit some of the key points and don't mention things you don't plan to interpret further.

Sad to see post that made the front page with the Official Review logo, sorry for the lengthy words, but as an old temper, can't help but feel so not used to poor quality review like this one. Feels so incomplete for a front page post.

*A review of it from tomsware addresses the key concerns of an nvme ssd at ease, e.g. price per gig, flash type, endurance rating, dram availability etc. without being overly wordy. It's just sadder to see that I am now presuming the reviewer must have scanned similar reviews and assimilated their mention of the ssd's lower lifespan, controller used, pricing into this review therefore it's not interpreted further.

An Official GBAtemp Review used to feel so personal to.. GBAtemp itself, it represents the effort of the staff representing GBAtemp in providing quality sourced info, for this review, it may not be required to provide 'niche' info like temperature readings which may be quite useful for PC builders but at least should be on par with the usually expected info in a review properly stated.

If this review was created just as a way to refer any potential sponsors behind I would be speechless and surely fine with it as the site get to strive on longer but otherwise, a big bummer as the GBAtemp-quality for tech review is no longer there
 
I've had genuine and verified SanDisk SSDs that have died within 1 year, simply being used as a boot device.
 
I have this exact NVMe, albeit the 1TB version. It's excellent.

Some misinformed comments here. Storage devices are not all the same - so many NVMe drives run at speeds well below what the standard can offer. 1.5TB/s is commonplace. This manages 3TB/s r/w which is what you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chary
I have the same drive. it's expected life is more than long enough to last me 15-20 years of use which i will assume is long enough for it to become obsolete. I see no downside to this drive aside from it should have an included heat sink but it doesn't run super hot anyways. this review honestly needs work aside form the overall score as it is indeed a really nice nvme for the price
 
Honest question: how does this load that much faster than, say, the three external 2TB Sandisk SSDs (yes, the ones that are $300 after taxes) that I have connected to my PC via USB? I've been re-playing Yakuza Kiwami 2, and the load times are simply gone. Like, 1-2 seconds at most when I load the game are spent on the load screen before I'm in the game, and this game's installed on an external drive, too!

Sure, file transfer speeds are probably through the roof, but since I'm sure both the PS5 and XSEX aren't going to be as open as the PS3 was in terms of what it'd let you do, what makes the M.2 that much better, be it nVmE or using a PCIe connection?

For what it's worrh, I'm rocking a Samsung 860 EVO M.2 SSD in my main rig, and it's badass, but it was chosen mainly because my build is a SFF build...along with it being a 1TB on sale on Amazon for $300 at the time I obtained it!
 
Honest question: how does this load that much faster than, say, the three external 2TB Sandisk SSDs (yes, the ones that are $300 after taxes) that I have connected to my PC via USB? I've been re-playing Yakuza Kiwami 2, and the load times are simply gone. Like, 1-2 seconds at most when I load the game are spent on the load screen before I'm in the game, and this game's installed on an external drive, too!

Sure, file transfer speeds are probably through the roof, but since I'm sure both the PS5 and XSEX aren't going to be as open as the PS3 was in terms of what it'd let you do, what makes the M.2 that much better, be it nVmE or using a PCIe connection?

For what it's worrh, I'm rocking a Samsung 860 EVO M.2 SSD in my main rig, and it's badass, but it was chosen mainly because my build is a SFF build...along with it being a 1TB on sale on Amazon for $300 at the time I obtained it!
Honestly, with the games of today it doesn't make a difference. I have the 1TB version of this NVMe and also have 2 SATA SSDs (640GB and 480GB). There's no difference even though the former is 3GB/s read/write and the latter are 500MB/s. It's not the bottleneck right now.

The difference will be the games of tomorrow, those that arrive in a year or two. The new consoles having NVMe will shift the goalposts quite a bit as devs will use the the extra bandwidth. Star Citizen is one of the few examples of games which currently do benefit from NVMe specficially.
 
I use a Silicon Power SSD 1TB in my current computer had to work out a couple kinks but its was a great value for $90, highly recommend this company!
 
Unless if you're transferring tens/hundreds of gigs of data on a daily basis, an nvme is a waste of money. for 99.9% of gamers, a sata ssd will do the same thing, as the bottleneck will be the GPU/CPU/RAM. Nvme really benefits video production and photography, where there's a plethora of data being driven, along with indexing.
 
Review cover
Product Information:

Reviews

  1. Alone in the Dark is a Survival Horror game available for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series S/X and PC.

  2. Step into post-apocalyptic Northern Finland in Rauniot, Act Normal Game’s debut point-and-click title. Let’s click away!

  3. Australia-based indie developer Drop Bear Bytes’ debut title, Broken Roads, launches today on PC and consoles. Does this new cRPG have what it takes to stand toe-to-toe to its contemporaries?

  4. Ereban: Shadow Legacy is Baby Robot Games’ debut title that merges classic stealth mechanics with a fast-paced ability to merge with shadows. Should you allow it to sneak into your PC gaming library?

  5. South Park is back in the gaming sphere with the followup to Obsidian’s hit duo of RPGs, South Park: Snow Day!

Site & Scene News

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: https://youtube.com/shorts/WOppJ92RgGU?si=KE79L6A_3jESsGQM