Review cover Intel i5 12600K CPU (Hardware)
Official GBAtemp Review

Ushering in the 12th generation of Intel processors, we check out the midrange i5 12600K!

attachFull296198

Intel is a name that needs no introduction. For many years the de facto choice for your PC’s CPU, they’ve since found themselves fiercely competing with AMD in both power and affordability. Hoping to be back on top once more, the 12th generation is here in three forms: the i9 12900, the i7 12700, and the i5 12600 we have on hand for review today. Each CPU comes in both a K and KF model, including and not including integrated graphics respectively, giving you a small saving if you’re going to be using a graphics card either way.

You can find an overview of the specs below:

  i5 12600K i5 12600KF
RRP $289 $264
Processor Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770

N/A

Cores/Threads 10/16 10/16
P-Cores 6 6
E-Cores 4 4
Max Turbo Frequency 4.90 GHz 4.90 GHz
P-Core Max Turbo Frequency 4.90 GHz 4.90 GHz
E-Core Max Turbo Frequency 3.60 GHz 3.60 GHz
P-Core Base Frequency 3.70 GHz 3.70 GHz
E-Core Base Frequency 2.80 GHz 2.80 GHz
Cache 20 MB Intel Smart Cache 20 MB Intel Smart Cache
Total L2 Cache 9.5 MB 9.5 MB
Processor Base Power 125 W 150 W

So to jump to the point, what exactly makes the 12th generation of Intel CPU any different to the 11th? They have a higher performance ceiling, that much can be assumed. The real point of interest here is in the hybrid architecture, taking a page out of Arm’s book with its big-little design. Instead of having each core operate at the same level, the CPUs on offer here have two types: performance and efficiency. Performance cores are the heavy lifters, while efficiency cores are designed to operate, as the name suggests, as efficiently as possible. Where in mobile computing this is particularly useful in battery preservation, only bringing out the performance cores when necessary, there are other aspects that also benefit the battery-less desktop design. Frankly, not every app you run on your PC is going to need its full power. The efficiency cores can be used to handle tasks that are perhaps non-time critical, or that simply don’t need everything being thrown at it. I’ve simplified this a fair bit, but if you are interested in the architecture, there’s a ton of information on big-little floating around.

It isn’t without its flaws, though the biggest kinks have been worked out since the chips launched late last year. Due to the hybrid design, certain DRM detected the efficiency cores as a separate system, causing crashes at startup or randomly during gameplay. Bravely Default 2, Mortal Kombat 11, and Far Cry Primal were among a list of more than 50 titles known to have issues. Though this has since been resolved through patches to games and Windows updates, it does shine an interesting light on the issues that come with this kind of change, at least for early adopters. With some luck, this is the last we’ll hear of it.

attachFull296199

I was struggling for pictures to go in this review, so please enjoy this image of the box next to one of its Geekbench scores.

Looking to the actual performance of the 12600 you’re unlikely to be disappointed. I only have two CPUs at my disposal at the moment, the 12600 itself and a more budget Ryzen 5 3600 in my main desktop setup. It’s worth noting the 3600 is more than a year old now and it’s not an even comparison. Our local mag staffer Tom also pitched in with the benchmarks, contributing his scores from a more comparable Ryzen 7 5800X. If you want to look up more CPU benchmarks to get a better idea of where this lands, check out a site like cpubenchmark.net.

The benchmarking tool I had handy was Cinebench R23, a free utility designed to push a CPU to its limits. I had originally installed this when isolating an issue on my personal PC build that caused it to crash, this ultimately leading to me upgrading my cooling solution when I found out the stock fan was causing my CPU to peak at 110 degrees Celsius. As well as this, you can find the scores from Geekbench 5 in the table below.

  Ryzen 5 3600 Ryzen 7 5800X Intel i5 12600K
Cinebench Multi Core 8792 pts 15363 pts 16648 pts
Cinebench Single Core 1146 pts 1594 pts 1817 pts
Geekbench Multi Core 6998 10800 12300
Geekbench Single Core 1185 1705 1794

Beyond raw performance, the 12600K does a good job in future proofing itself in its compatibility for both DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, whilst still retaining compatibility with DDR4 RAM for those not looking to completely overhaul their setup at the moment. This is particularly important with the high costs of DDR5 at the moment though you’ll be needing to buy a new motherboard for the LGA1700 socket either way, and at the time of writing at least, they don’t come cheap. With the CPU also not including a stock fan, you’ll also need to go out of your way to get something that supports this new socket, though it should be noted companies like Noctua already have kits available to fit their existing range.

For those curious, you can find the full build used in the review below:

  • Motherboard: ROG Strix Z690-E Gaming WiFi
  • GPU: TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • RAM: Polaris RGB 32 GB (2x16 GB) @ 4800 MHz
Review imageReview imageReview image

All in all, the 12600 stands out as the current primo pick for any budding new gaming PC build, but whether it’s worth upgrading for might be a more difficult question. It’s a money sink no matter which way you look at it, but the performance on offer paired with the DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 support make it a fine choice if you know you’ll be putting money down either way.

Verdict

What We Liked ...
  • Great performance at its price point
  • Available at a cheaper price without integrated graphics
  • Hybrid architecture allows for more efficient power usage
  • Future proofed with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 support
What We Didn't Like ...
  • Price of entry is steep when factoring in additional costs
  • Initial issues caused by anti-cheat and the hybrid architecture
9
out of 10

Overall

This CPU is a fantastic pick for anybody wanting a powerful gaming build, but it does come at a cost. With the LGA1700 socket only available in new and rather pricey motherboards, it's not an easy upgrade without replacing significant parts of your system. If you have the cash to splash though, you can't go wrong here.
No way 5800x has a higher single core score. Something is wrong with your test.

edit: it was updated
 
No way 5800x has a higher single core score. Something is wrong with your test.
It's worth noting the average on Geekbench is 1867, but that was the score I got from just running the benchmark without messing with anything. Unsure why this is the case.

Edit: Reran Geekbench a few times, these seem a bit closer to what we would expect:

Single CoreMulti Core
178212363
179512402
180612304


My bad, like much of the stuff I've recently reviewed I'm a bit new to this area and didn't even think about variance in benchmark results. I edit the results in the review to be an average of these scores.
 
Intel has definitely done a great job with its 12th generation. I recently upgraded from a 4th generation Intel processor (the 4930K) to the 12900K and I can definitely feel the power boost! The 12900k is probably overkill for what I'll generally be using it for, but damn is it a nice CPU.
 
Definitely done with ryzen. Not looking to upgrade anytime soon but when I do it's gonna be Intel
 
Power usage is its weakest point but man I am loving what Intel is doing here, bringing in a big.LITTLE-like model to x86 is the best way to address both power concerns and performance concerns and you can see it is paying off.

I imagine AMD might go in a similar direction a few generations in but right now the field is even for both sides, which is a win for consumers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JavaScribe
Never thought that integrated graphics would become a gaming solution like it is today.

My work computer died and I got late last year a 10th gen i3 and I could only find the F version, as integrated graphics was in high demand for gamers.

Strange times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JavaScribe
Yeah not giving up my Ruben for intel. I prefer what amd is doing instead of renaming like intel does. And yea. I’ve used intel for many years before switching to amd.
 
Somebody just told that the older CPU cooler won't fix on these new CPU? Is tha right?
You'll need one that specifically supports the LGA1700 socket. Like I mention in the review, a number of companies already have kits out there. I used a Noctua cooler in this setup.
 
I don't like the hybrid cores and whole-having-to-use-Windows 11 just to use it properly, then have DRM issues with the E-cores, etc. Yeah, Windows 11 is not worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: felix.200
It's seriously impressive about the IPC gains 12th gen made. A bit rich for me at present, but hard to deny the improvements.
 
Golden Cove is ridiculously fast as an architecture, it's just a shame that (currently) poor DDR5 pricing and a mild lack of cache just somewhat holds it back from absolutely excelling. All that being said, I'm happy with upgrading from a 3700x on B350 to a 12700K on Z690, but I'm still gonna be really curious to see how well Intel's 13th Gen optimizations from 12th Gen stacks up against Zen 4.

Mobile Big.little for Intel looks to have a lot of potential given how hard the voltage/floor is pushed on Intel 12th Gen on Desktop. The optimal place for the efficiency curve on the P-Cores and E-Cores lies at it's rated stock clocks after all.
 
I got a 5800x back in December, i'm pretty on the fence about my next CPU upgrade as my next PC part will be one of those 4000 series RTX cards for sure...I do like what i see here though!
as for the DRM, once again it hurts actual buyers more than anything else imo, which sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hobbledehoy899
I don't like the hybrid cores and whole-having-to-use-Windows 11 just to use it properly, then have DRM issues with the E-cores, etc. Yeah, Windows 11 is not worth it.
If it's actually only DRM that's been having these issues, then that just proves how fucking shitty it is! Also, I'm not terribly surprised by the Windows 11 de facto requirement, since it shows actual NT kernel development again (which is nice).

This isn't related to the hardware at hand, and might very well be controversial, but I actually really like Windows 11 and wholeheartedly consider it the only worthwhile 64-bit version of Windows now (32-bit Windows XP will always have a special place in my heart though, what with its combination of exFAT support and an NTVDM that can seemingly do no wrong within reason).
 
  • Like
Reactions: matpower
If it's actually only DRM that's been having these issues, then that just proves how fucking shitty it is! Also, I'm not terribly surprised by the Windows 11 de facto requirement, since it shows actual NT kernel development again (which is nice).

This isn't related to the hardware at hand, and might very well be controversial, but I actually really like Windows 11 and wholeheartedly consider it the only worthwhile 64-bit version of Windows now (32-bit Windows XP will always have a special place in my heart though, what with its combination of exFAT support and an NTVDM that can seemingly do no wrong within reason).

The fact the taskbar icons are centered and you can't move them, or the rounded edges in Explorer, really bug me, I like the look of 10 better.
 
The fact the taskbar icons are centered and you can't move them, or the rounded edges in Explorer, really bug me, I like the look of 10 better.
You can move the taskbar icons? I put mine to the left straaaaaaaight away lol, can't be dealing with that. Biggest loss for me is the start menu, since it was a handy place for groups of shortcuts. I had only just started to use it too ;_; Otherwise I get on with Windows 11. The new snap layouts really help with organising an ultrawide monitor, especially with a three column layout.
 
You can move the taskbar icons? I put mine to the left straaaaaaaight away lol, can't be dealing with that. Biggest loss for me is the start menu, since it was a handy place for groups of shortcuts. I had only just started to use it too ;_; Otherwise I get on with Windows 11. The new snap layouts really help with organising an ultrawide monitor, especially with a three column layout.



Among other issues, I'm not upgrading for a lonnnnnnnnnng time
 
Ahhh you meant it couldn't be repositioned. I hadn't even tried that. But you can at least make them not centred. I definitely did that lol

And not a fan of the extra steps to right click the desktop, same with the Network center, rounded edges. There is literally no reason for me to go to 11.
 
I just got this CPU. Was a great buy, system is running ultra smooth and cool with a noctua nh-d15.

Integrated graphics need linux 5.16 though. I tried compiling that on debian and got a ton of graphic artifacts, but moved to Arch and got zero issues now. Be wary very few distros ship with 5.16. Without graphics you need 5.15 which is far more common and is on Debian testing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hobbledehoy899
Review cover

Reviews

  1. Hardware

    Tribit StormBox Micro 2

    Cramming a ton of features into a small package is a difficult feat on its own, but the Tribit StormBox Micro 2 manages all that and then some.
  2. Hardware

    Epomaker CoolKiller CK98 Keyboard

    Did Epomaker learn its lessons from the last RGB-ified outing, with the new CoolKiller keyboard?
  3. Nintendo Switch

    Dredge

    Indie title Dredge sails you out on a fishing adventure; but what looks like a cosy trip in the open seas can turn into a fight for survival after dark. Will you conquer the seas?
  4. Computer

    ShowGunners

    Turn-based is definitely not my go-to, but ShowGunners definitely piqued my interest so I had to give it a whirl!
  5. Computer

    Case of the Golden Idol

    Case of the Golden Idol was one of the most acclaimed games of 2022. With its first DLC releasing today, does it still live up to the hype?
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Sonic Angel Knight @ Sonic Angel Knight: Chili dog :ninja: