Review cover Dragon Age: The Veilguard GBAtemp review
Computer

Product Information:

  • Release Date (NA): October 31, 2024
  • Release Date (EU): October 31, 2024
  • Publisher: Electronic Arts
  • Developer: BioWare
  • Genres: Action RPG
  • Also For: PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S

Game Features:

Single player
Local Multiplayer
Online Multiplayer
Co-operative
A decade later, BioWare is back with a new Dragon Age game. Has the wait for Dragon Age: The Veilguard been worth it?

attachFull470874

BioWare has had a rocky experience with its last game releases. Between Mass Effect Andromeda and Anthem, it would be easy to say that the developer seemed to have lost its touch. Mass Effect Legendary Edition did indicate a semblance of a return to form, but it didn’t deliver the experience of any new games. Now, BioWare has revisited a beloved franchise with the launch of Dragon Age: The Veilguard. This marks the first entry to the Dragon Age series after 10 years; and it begs the question: was the wait worth it?

attachFull470876

A divine quest

Rather aptly, Dragon Age: The Veilguard takes place ten years after Dragon Age: Inquisition. Since then, Varric has been recruiting new members, including this entry’s protagonist Rook, to find Solas. The game starts off with the team having found the Dread Wolf and attempt to stop him from causing irreversible damage to the world by tearing down the Veil. 

While they do manage to do so, the process led to new threats emerging. Ghilan’nain and Elgar’nan, who are literal Gods, have escaped from the veil and plan to use the power of the blight to bring the world under their command.

attachFull470877

Review imageReview image

Rook, under the guidance of Varric, sets out to prevent this catastrophe from unfolding; but not without the assistance of other characters who go on to form the titular Veilguard.

attachFull470880

Review image Review image

Return to Thedas

From the early trailers, it was evident that this new Dragon Age adventure wouldn’t look the same as other Dragon Age titles. Compared to Inquisition’s aesthetics that leaned more towards realistic visuals, The Veilguard takes a more stylistic approach. It’s not a choice I’m against as, even with the new look, this new title, which takes place in the northern regions of Thedas, is vibrant and full of details across its varied environments. Minrathous’ market is bustling with activity, while the Arlathan Forest’s lush vegetation offers a contrasting calmness. 

Even if The Veilguard veers away from realistic graphics, BioWare has added destructible environment in its fantasy world. This adds a touch of immersion while also encouraging exploration as you can find hidden chests behind crates.

attachFull470885

Review image Review image

Despite the varied locations, you do revisit the same places over the course of the game. While it’s noticeable, it didn't distract me much from the captivating plot. Indeed, as a true BioWare single-player RPG, Dragon Age: The Veilguard has a finely crafted narrative. This is presented in a highly cinematic fashion and brought to life by professional voice acting throughout.

Rook’s quest to defy Gods and recruiting an adequate team to do so is gripping as the adventure is not without new challenges. Each of your seven companions are also central to the story, with each having unique characteristics and backstories for you to explore in their individual side quests. 

While there are recurring, and fan-favourite, characters, the new additions are also interesting and unique like Luca is who is possessed by a demon and Davrin who has a young griffon by his side. I felt invested in each of the characters as they are each unique to see their stories and side quests through.

attachFull470886

Review image Review image Review image

However, there is a noticeable slow burn to the narrative pacing. You might not relate to the companions from the get go but sticking with the game is rewarding. By learning more about the companions, you can also decide who to team up with in combat, where to allocate each in decisive moments, and, of course, who you’ll romance. Completing side quests and also faction quests are optional but this choice will influence your experience of the game, especially the ending, thanks to the branching narrative design.

Indeed, as with other BioWare games, your in-game choices have a meaningful impact; some of which are morally challenging. One of the earlier examples is making the choice between helping one of two areas under dragon attacks. You know that one region will suffer and this will have severe consequences; but you don’t know how and need to make a choice.

attachFull470891

Similarly, your dialogue choices can gain the approval or disapproval of your companions. But by taking on quests related to each companion, you get to learn more about their individual motives and this can help your future decisions. However, as with the companion stories, encountering meaningful decisions do take their time, and only really start to ramp up towards the latter half of the game.

If you’ve played a BioWare game before, this story will feel familiar yet original. It’s a true statement that the developer is back in full force after a marked period of absence. 

Defy the Gods with a new gameplay

It’s not just the looks that are new but Dragon Age: The Veilguard also brings notable changes to its gameplay. Most significantly, you only control Rook in this entry. In combat, you can command your companions to conjure spells and special moves but Rook is the one issuing those commands. This diminished control over companions somewhat plays against relating to your companions, which takes more time in this entry.

This change follows the fact that The Veilguard adopts a more action-RPG combat approach, making it more akin to Mass Effect games than previous Dragon Age titles. Rook has heavy and light attacks, and can also parry and dodge. Based on your chosen character class, you have unique abilities that you can further upgrade via the skill tree. You can choose to use one of your own or that of your companion’s abilities from a circular dial; and there is a cool down period after using an ability.

Completing encounters rewards you with weapons and/or armour which you can then equip for a slight boost in stats. This real-time combat mechanic makes for a more engaging experience, especially as you take on towering enemies and literal Gods. But this approach is lacking in terms of strategizing which might need some adjustments for Dragon Age veterans. 

attachFull470894

Review image Review image Review image

I didn’t mind this change personally but it might be divisive for some. You have more encounters that are less impactful, but they serve as a welcome playground to test new skills and combinations with companion abilities. Through such encounters, I found, for example, Bellara to be better suited for healing and Taash’ aggro approach to match well with my ranged skills. Via the skill tree, you can make some companions lean towards a particular tactic, test it out in combat and refund your skill points to respect characters should you want to.

Encounters offer a fair challenge and the AI is competent, whether it is enemies or party members. But the action focus means frequent encounters with similar enemies and I felt variety was lacking over the 20+ hour duration of the main quest. I also found focusing on particular enemies during combat to be rather awkward and disorienting. This is one of the main areas in which combat could have been better executed.

attachFull470893

As for exploration, the main areas are rather linear, and sandbox at best. While you are free to explore and take on side quests, some of which offer more freedom, the approach feels restrictive. Having a more open-ended approach in the main areas would be welcome, but the linearity does enable the main story to be more streamlined, with the option to explore further if you wish to. 

Exploring further and taking on side quests is encouraged as you can spend more time exploring some of your companion’s native areas and learn more about the situation of the dwellers. By exploring outside of the main quest areas, you can even spend some memorable time with your companions such as drinking coffee with Lucanis or playing rock, paper, scissors with Manfred.

attachFull470884

Dragon Age: The Veilguard - BioWare’s return to form?

Despite the new looks and mechanics, Dragon Age: The Veilguard ultimately feels like a Dragon Age game in both story and gameplay. This feeling might take some time to sink in due to the slow burn nature of its execution, but if you’ve been waiting for a new Dragon Age game, this one will feel rewarding. 

It has a high replay value by virtue of its branching narrative design and optional side quests that link into the main quest. You’ll be tempted to replay whether it’s to see other romance options play out or what path would unfold if you take other decisions during key, branching events. Even the “bad ending” feels cohesive to your actions, and keeps the player wondering about how events would unfold if they took other decisions or spent more time tackling certain side quests.

attachFull470898

Dragon Age: The Veilguard will feel familiar to those who have played BioWare games before but it does pack some new changes that signify a new era for the studio and won't make everyone happy; but all things considered, I would say the wait has been worth it. After completing the game, it gave me an encouraging sign that BioWare is back in a new, full form, ready to make memorable single-player experiences, with some new twist to the developer’s formula. And this bodes well for the future of Dragon Age and Mass Effect alike.

Dragon Age: The Veilguard - Launch Trailer

Verdict

What We Liked ...
  • Dragon Age (and BioWare) is back!
  • Engaging plotline and interesting companions
  • Branching narrative design with morally challenging decisions
What We Didn't Like ...
  • Limited enemy variety
  • Linear level design of main quest
  • Slow burn excecution
8
Gameplay
This new entry to the Dragon Age franchise adopts an action-RPG gameplay which might take some time to get used to for returning players, but it does work well with the overall design of the game.
8
Presentation
Dragon Age: The Veilguard packs a different look from other Dragon Age games but it is highly detailed, with interesting characters and meaningful in-game decisions that are characteristics of BioWare games.
9
Lasting Appeal
While it has a slow burn design, sticking to it is rewarding as the narrative unfolds and the branching narratives keeps the intrigue going while enticing replays.
8.5
out of 10

Overall

Dragon Age is back with a new look and gameplay that works well if you stick to it; but Dragon Age: The Veilguard is above all a solid statement of BioWare’s return to form to make memorable single-player experiences.
Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Utter and utmost trash of a game. Which display the decadence of bioware and western companies, this won't be the final nail for bioware though, mass effect will decide that. 8.5 shows how biased the reviewer is, probably got for free and wants to keep getting it...
 
Utter and utmost trash of a game. Which display the decadence of bioware and western companies, this won't be the final nail for bioware though, mass effect will decide that. 8.5 shows how biased the reviewer is, probably got for free and wants to keep getting it...

Let me guess. You have never played the game but know for a fact that it's utter and utmost trash. Correct? Legit review scores are quite favorable but let me take a second guess, you believe the anti-woke crybaby mob's review bombing scores. Correct?
 
Uh oh, the attention seeker came back to throw the tantrum, lets not engage much.

Imagine posting the two things you did so far, then accusing me of attention seeking. :rofl:

Let me guess. You have never played the game but know for a fact that it's utter and utmost trash. Correct? Legit review scores are quite favorable but let me take a second guess, you believe the anti-woke crybaby mob's review bombing scores. Correct?
 
Utter and utmost trash of a game. Which display the decadence of bioware and western companies, this won't be the final nail for bioware though, mass effect will decide that. 8.5 shows how biased the reviewer is, probably got for free and wants to keep getting it...

8.5 score shows "how biased the reviewer is", but your opinion on the game, without having played it at all, is unbiased? Do you understand the word "bias"?
 
I could understand if the actual combat gameplay could be under "What We Liked.." even if it's repetitive, but aside from that, all the points that are listed under "What We Liked ..." has to be a joke.

I have seen gameplays of this game, and none of the points are true. The dialogues are laughably bad or uninteresting. Also, if Bioware is back, they would have continue adding more DLC/expansion content like they did in ALL past DA games. Instead, they are being moved to work on the next Mass Effect game.
 
EA has really bought a lot of ratings. Every day I read a page that is 99% about politics. There was also a review of this game there. From a woman who has probably never played a game before. Probably never played this one either. The reviews all sound similar. This one was also bought.
 
8.5 score shows "how biased the reviewer is", but your opinion on the game, without having played it at all, is unbiased? Do you understand the word "bias"?
Read the quote below, that's your answer
I could understand if the actual combat gameplay could be under "What We Liked.." even if it's repetitive, but aside from that, all the points that are listed under "What We Liked ..." has to be a joke.

I have seen gameplays of this game, and none of the points are true. The dialogues are laughably bad or uninteresting. Also, if Bioware is back, they would have continue adding more DLC/expansion content like they did in ALL past DA games. Instead, they are being moved to work on the next Mass Effect game.
Pretty much, makes no sense whatsoever.
 
I could understand if the actual combat gameplay could be under "What We Liked.." even if it's repetitive, but aside from that, all the points that are listed under "What We Liked ..." has to be a joke.

I have seen gameplays of this game, and none of the points are true. The dialogues are laughably bad or uninteresting. Also, if Bioware is back, they would have continue adding more DLC/expansion content like they did in ALL past DA games. Instead, they are being moved to work on the next Mass Effect game.

How much gameplay? I'm not sure how a person could make those claims unless they've watched at least a few hours worth of continuous gameplay. Imo something like 15-30 minutes of just bits and pieces from here and there throughout the game, out of a 20+ hour main campaign, wouldn't give an accurate representation.

A couple of things possibly indicate where brief viewing would not be beneficial. The first being the actual review which states "However, there is a noticeable slow burn to the narrative pacing. You might not relate to the companions from the get go but sticking with the game is rewarding." The second being that watching someone else play is NEVER, EVER as fun as playing a game yourself. At least not imo.
 
8.5? WHAT.

The characters and writing are laughably awful, there's very little of the darkness and seriousness present in previous games, and it's very heavy-handed in pushing undesirable gay and trans themes.
Not to mention the repetitive and tedious combat.

There's no way to be, using Mass Effect lingo, a "Renegade" here, insulting people and getting party members killed off from bad choices (or willingly choosing said choices), and the intra-team conflict is a joke - barely present at all. It's ridiculously awful.

Oh, and it barely uses choices made in previous DA games, using just a couple from Inquisition, so that's basically abandoned. Morrigan could've had a kid in earlier games, depending on your choices, yet that's never brought up here - Morrigan herself isn't used well at all, either.

Yeah, I can't take this review seriously, sorry. From memory, SkillUp did a review a couple of weeks ago, and that one was far more on-point.
 
i will have to check this game out but im not sure it will be good. after elden rings shadow of erdtree was held up as a great game when its complete trash i find it hard to take reviews credibly. most reviewers said that elden ring was game of the century and i had to force myself to play it for 40hrs waiting for there to be something cool to get to the point i just quit the game because it was absolute trash.
 
i will have to check this game out but im not sure it will be good. after elden rings shadow of erdtree was held up as a great game when its complete trash i find it hard to take reviews credibly. most reviewers said that elden ring was game of the century and i had to force myself to play it for 40hrs waiting for there to be something cool to get to the point i just quit the game because it was absolute trash.

Yeah. Okay. Whatever. You must mean 40 hours trying to get past the first major boss fight so you gave up. :rofl:
 
Yeah. Okay. Whatever. You must mean 40 hours trying to get past the first major boss fight so you gave up. :rofl:
Ehhhh I feel like we need to move away from the notion of "you disliked it so you must have just been bad at the game". I reviewed Elden Ring when it came out and came away with an incredibly positive opinion of it, but I don't see a reason why somebody with a negative opinion should be pushed down. To me it generally just means they value certain things differently, and that's completely fine. In those situations where people find their larger opinions differing from reviewers, there is still some value in reviews mind. You just have to look at what the reviewer is finding positive and negative and question how much those points matter to you, as opposed to just looking at the end score.
 
i will have to check this game out but im not sure it will be good. after elden rings shadow of erdtree was held up as a great game when its complete trash i find it hard to take reviews credibly. most reviewers said that elden ring was game of the century and i had to force myself to play it for 40hrs waiting for there to be something cool to get to the point i just quit the game because it was absolute trash.

I agree Elden Ring was not the best game ever, I said this when it released, it wasn't even 2nd best.

Elden Ring has quite a few flaws, but they're easy to over look, it's a beautiful game and it can be a fun game.

I disagree it's trash and still think it's a very, very good game
 
  • Like
Reactions: LFA_News
Played 4-5 hours... Lost so much brain cells... Thank god i lend it and Not bought it ..
I Hope it Flops. Brian washing , soulless ,non creative Game which is Not for gamers. Its for braindead people who have a Attention mind of a goldfish. Simple childish Dialogue, and braindead gameplay
 
I mean, worth for getting SOME conclusion to the story and, like I already said, would probably have not received as much flack without the Dragon Age moniker. I expected more after 10 years but on the other hand, now the major storyline has a resolution (sort of).
 
Played 4-5 hours... Lost so much brain cells... Thank god i lend it and Not bought it ..
I Hope it Flops. Brian washing , soulless ,non creative Game which is Not for gamers. Its for braindead people who have a Attention mind of a goldfish. Simple childish Dialogue, and braindead gameplay
Let's not forget certain "politics" being slammed at the player every fifteen seconds or so.
This is not a game, this is some kind of joke, it will flop hard.
 
glad i dont use reviewers score as a means to decide whether i'll play a game or not especially this game getting so many "positives". i've seen plenty of clips of how easy the puzzles in this game was, the bantering of your companion that belongs in a disney show, Morrigan doesn't feel the same Morrigan in DA: O personality wise to how Taash is the worst character i've ever seen in a triple A game.

let's also not forget you can't act like a total A-hole like you did compared to dragon age origins. all the dialogue you read is different when your MC speaks especially with the jerk dialogue
 
Ehhhh I feel like we need to move away from the notion of "you disliked it so you must have just been bad at the game". I reviewed Elden Ring when it came out and came away with an incredibly positive opinion of it, but I don't see a reason why somebody with a negative opinion should be pushed down. To me it generally just means they value certain things differently, and that's completely fine. In those situations where people find their larger opinions differing from reviewers, there is still some value in reviews mind. You just have to look at what the reviewer is finding positive and negative and question how much those points matter to you, as opposed to just looking at the end score.

It's more that I really don't believe anyone that says they played a game they think is absolute trash for 40 hours. Never in my life have I continued to play a game for that amount of time, that I wasn't enjoying whatsoever and felt was complete shit.

Apart from that. I can only laugh at the "But but but!!!! The gays and trans are trying to brainwash and force themselves on me!!!!" comments. Poor little lambies. Better just stay inside so you can be sure to not catch that airborne LGBTQ virus. I hear it's more catchy and deadlier than covid! :rofl:
 
  • Angry
Reactions: SDA
I just want to know what it is with the "return to form", or similar derivative, in almost every single positive review about this game :wtf:.
It's not a bad game from what I played so far but almost all reviews read the same and have the same kind of statements like that one, was it mandatory or something?
 
Is this Prans person is trans or gay something? I would understand why he liked ''diverse and inclusive' dialogues that Kotaku and other ''trusted'' media liked then))) Literally clown and review was definitely paid. Why GBATemp now feels like resetera?

I am and have been straight as a board my entire life, yet I have no issues with "diverse and inclusive dialogues". I welcome them if that's what the devs want to have in their game. If I didn't, I could easily just not play it rather than "OMGZZZZ! Th0Ez gOD dayUM GaiZ In Muh GaEmz agAin!!!!" Why are so many people triggered by it? I think we can all clearly see who the bigots on the forum are by the comments in this topic alone. Nothing is being forced upon anyone here & nothing is trying to brainwash anyone. I don't see LGBTQ constantly crying about things like Stellar Blade. "STOP PUTTING HYPER SEXUALIZED WOMEN WITH BOOBS IN MY GAMES!!! YOU MUST MAKE THEM FLAT CHESTED TRANS!!!! DEVS TRYING TO FORCE ME TO BE STRAIGHT SO THE GAME SUCKS!!!" :rofl:
 
Can anyone, honestly, explain to me where all the review bombing and hate for the game is coming from?
Is it really only because of the gender-neutral options that are available?
I bet that 99% of the people that rant about this to no avail (including in this comment section) haven't even considered playing the game.
Granted, these themes don't fit the high fantasy setting, but I have played it for about 3-4 hours and apart from it slowly turning into a really good and fun to explore Action-RPG, I've only seen ONE dialogue option so far that allowed me to use more gender-neutral choices. Which I skipped.
It is absolutely nothing like they would force their woke lgbtq propaganda down your faggot throat as some people make it appear to be. That is just idiotic and plain false.
 
i get it because he's gay
haha that's not god's way

EDIT: the above is sarcastic
the comment i'm making is that the 'punchline' of his reply is literally just that he's gay and gay is bad, nobody would admit to being gay
if you're gonna be a bigoted piece of trash, at least offer more comedically than '[group] bad'
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CrazyMage
i get it because he's gay
haha that's not god's way

Your evidence of either of the two is? Yeah. That's what I thought. Zero.

My God. This place is a fucking SHIT HOLE! People trashing on LGBTQ & accusing heterosexuals of being otherwise? Why? Because they're offended they might catch a gay virus or some stupid shit from a video game, or from someone else playing a video game. Trashing the reviewer for enjoying it and making homophobic comments about them because they don't agree with the score given? What the fuck is going on here? Some of you are flat out garbage people. Like, seriously. Low level scum of the Earth. Bigoted fucking "OMZZZ No7 T3h Gaiz! In Mie GaeMZ!!!!" crybaby losers. And the mods just allow this trash to continue. Worthless. As was stated elsewhere, moderation needs a complete rehaul because this is a complete joke.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CrazyMage
Your evidence of either of the two is? Yeah. That's what I thought. Zero.

My God. This place is a fucking SHIT HOLE! People trashing on LGBTQ & accusing heterosexuals of being otherwise? Why? Because they're offended they might catch a gay virus or some stupid shit from a video game, or from someone else playing a video game. Trashing the reviewer for enjoying it and making homophobic comments about them because they don't agree with the score given? What the fuck is going on here? Some of you are flat out garbage people. Like, seriously. Low level scum of the Earth. Bigoted fucking "OMZZZ No7 T3h Gaiz! In Mie GaeMZ!!!!" crybaby losers. And the mods just allow this trash to continue. Worthless. As was stated elsewhere, moderation needs a complete rehaul because this is a complete joke.
it's a fucking crazy indictment on this website that my obviously scathing sarcasm was taken at face value
 
I am and have been straight as a board my entire life, yet I have no issues with "diverse and inclusive dialogues". I welcome them if that's what the devs want to have in their game. If I didn't, I could easily just not play it rather than "OMGZZZZ! Th0Ez gOD dayUM GaiZ In Muh GaEmz agAin!!!!" Why are so many people triggered by it? I think we can all clearly see who the bigots on the forum are by the comments in this topic alone. Nothing is being forced upon anyone here & nothing is trying to brainwash anyone. I don't see LGBTQ constantly crying about things like Stellar Blade. "STOP PUTTING HYPER SEXUALIZED WOMEN WITH BOOBS IN MY GAMES!!! YOU MUST MAKE THEM FLAT CHESTED TRANS!!!! DEVS TRYING TO FORCE ME TO BE STRAIGHT SO THE GAME SUCKS!!!" :rofl:
I don't think people are triggered by the presence of this stuff, I think people just don't like hamfisted writing that sounds like how the writers wish their dinner conversations went with their parents an friends. In general, most people don't like being preached at outside of media their hobbies center around. People definitely do not like being preached to inside the media they like and they haven't since the third season of M.A.S.H.
 
I don't much about all the controversy surrounding this game, but when I see negatives like
  • Limited enemy variety
  • Linear level design of main quest
  • Slow burn excecution
I wonder how this could get such a high rating. Surely none of the old classic BioWare games had "limited enemy variety" as well as "linear level design of the main quest," or am I just wallowing in nostalgia?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HellGhast
So many people refunded it, even after giving it a ''good review'', so I honestly don't think I'll bother
The good reviews on steam are people farming jester reactions which can net you some nice points, if you see the graphs you'll see the majority of the good reviews are on the first days, and these reviews are full of bait, because of that they have a lot of reactions, mostly jester. If you sort all reviews by most helpful on the other hand, you'll be scrolling quite a lot until you find a single positive review.
 
Is this Prans person is trans or gay something? I would understand why he liked ''diverse and inclusive' dialogues that Kotaku and other ''trusted'' media liked then))) Literally clown and review was definitely paid. Why GBATemp now feels like resetera?
He has something to gain, either wants clout or free games. At least GBAtemp isn't banning like resetera does.
Actually, I'm fine with flat lolis, but please no hags B-)
Hell yeah, bring the cute and funny!!! No ugly ogres.
 
  • Love
Reactions: CrazyMage
I liked the first game, and own it. Passed on the second and third game. I watched a bit of this game on Youtube, and NAH, not interested, not even interested in pirating it. It's just not a very good game.


I'm utterly shocked that such a bad video game, could come from the company that made all time greats like Mass Effect Andromeda and Anthem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newo
And the mods just allow this trash to continue. Worthless. As was stated elsewhere, moderation needs a complete rehaul because this is a complete joke.
I really appreciate gbatemp not censoring people's opinions and allowing people to express themselves. it would be draconian to censor and only the weak cant handle other people's opinions. you dont have to agree with other peoples opinions but they are allowed to have them.

thank you gbatemp for giving everyone here a space to speak without over moderating. some people act like children and throw tantrums when they see free speech they dont like and thats sad.
 
This is just not true, it's only for ONE character which you can happily ignore.
Let me offer you some wisdom in form of analogy then.
If you add a big spoon of sugar to your scrambled eggs, will you just ignore it and eat?
If you add raw oil to your ice-cream, will you just ignore it and eat?
Finally if you add a poo to your soup, will you just ignore it and eat?

Before you will say "it's not the same", it is EXACTLY the same. All it takes is one bad ingredient to ruin the whole food. The politics in games are the poo in the soup, they stop being games and become political piles of stinking poison.

Another woke garbage and DEI propaganda. But it looks like it has abysmal sale numbers for this kind of a game, which is actually a really good thing.
Also, the reviewer is probably wearing pink satin panties and has blue hair.
You mean "DIE LGBTFUNGI" propaganda.
They want people to use "DEI" because it's latin for "god", they want to feel like gods even tough they clearly aren't ones.

EDIT - Fixed typo.
 
Let me offer you some wisdom in form of analogy then.
If you add a big spoon of sugar to your scrambled eggs, will you just ignore it and eat?
If you add raw oil to your ice-cream, will you just ignore it and eat?
Finally if you add a poo to your soup, will you just ignore it and eat?

Before you will say "it's not the same", it is EXACTLY the same. All it takes is one bad ingredient o ruin the whole food. The politics in games are the poo in the soup, they stop being games and become political piles of stinking poison.


You mean "DIE LGBTFUNGI" propaganda.
They want people to use "DEI" because it's latin for "god", they want to feel like gods even tough they clearly aren't ones.

Wow the amount of deranged copium is just over 9000
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darth Meteos
  • Deleted by DinohScene
I really appreciate gbatemp not censoring people's opinions and allowing people to express themselves. it would be draconian to censor and only the weak cant handle other people's opinions. you dont have to agree with other peoples opinions but they are allowed to have them.

thank you gbatemp for giving everyone here a space to speak without over moderating. some people act like children and throw tantrums when they see free speech they dont like and thats sad.
"other people's opinions" here means bigotry
i don't care for it in my spaces, and think less of spaces that do allow it
you're allowed to have that opinion, but i'd rather you had it somewhere else
 
"other people's opinions" here means bigotry
i don't care for it in my spaces, and think less of spaces that do allow it
you're allowed to have that opinion, but i'd rather you had it somewhere else
who made u the morality police? thankfully gbatemp is independent and allows free speech. you can think whatever u like but that doesnt change gbatemps reputation for being an independent open forum for all. not just people who conform to your worldview so you feel your space is censored to put a fake reality into place.
 
"other people's opinions" here means bigotry
i don't care for it in my spaces, and think less of spaces that do allow it
you're allowed to have that opinion, but i'd rather you had it somewhere else
You're free to leave, they/them. There are enough echo chambers where you can reside with like minded, if you are too afraid of the general public opinion. ResetEra would always welcome subjects like you.
 
Why the fuck did this place go to hell.
"other people's opinions" here means bigotry
i don't care for it in my spaces, and think less of spaces that do allow it
you're allowed to have that opinion, but i'd rather you had it somewhere else
You can like a game or you can dislike a game. Everybody has opinions. I like complete dogshit games no no reason and I like masterpieces should my opinion affect you.

Plus this isn't the politics board. Why are we going political here.
 
Because the majority of negative judgements are weak little users protesting for one qunari trans and repeating soundbites from others.
 
EA has really bought a lot of ratings. Every day I read a page that is 99% about politics. There was also a review of this game there. From a woman who has probably never played a game before. Probably never played this one either. The reviews all sound similar. This one was also bought.
would not doubt the reviews are bought

especially since bioware and steam have been caught deleting negative reviews on the game so it has a "mostly positive" review status
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZeroFX and tpax
Why the fuck did this place go to hell.

You can like a game or you can dislike a game. Everybody has opinions. I like complete dogshit games no no reason and I like masterpieces should my opinion affect you.

Plus this isn't the politics board. Why are we going political here.
Culture poisoning coupled with people getting their opinions not from playing games but listening to Youtubers and Twitter.
Gaming stopped being about gaming since honestly I don't think most people play games anymore. It's become a signal for which side of the argument you are on and which 5 talking points you will pick up and scream at the other side's 5 talking points.
The same thing has been happening with anime now that anime has gone more mainstream.
would not doubt the reviews are bought

especially since bioware and steam have been caught deleting negative reviews on the game so it has a "mostly positive" review status
I do wonder how many of the reviews that were removed were actually people who played the game for more than a few minutes before review bombing with some Youtuber's talking points. If they removed reviews that actually talked about the flaws and issues with the games, I can agree that's a problem. But if they removed "played for 5 minutes, pronouns bad!" I am honestly ok with removing spam like that.
 
would not doubt the reviews are bought

especially since bioware and steam have been caught deleting negative reviews on the game so it has a "mostly positive" review status
Ah classic Bitchendo move, however Kimishima did the "prevention" method to scare reviewers that if they won't give new Zelda - at that time - "10/10" then their reviews will be taken down or maybe even sued. In the case of "Dragon Age" thing it's post facto, deleting the results after they appear to make it look like "mostly positive" great game (which it's not).
 
  • Dragon Age (and BioWare) is back!
  • Engaging plotline and interesting companions
  • Branching narrative design with morally challenging decisions
WTF? ALL THOSE ARE BLATANTLY LIES
> Dragon Age is back? nope, it no longer play like a DA game, it's like a cheap MMO action game. And those people who made DA left already
> Engaging plotline and interesting companions - it speaks for itself, plotline may not that bad, BUT WRITING? COMPANIONS? WTF?
> Branching narrative with morally challenging decisions?? It doesn't even let you make decisions, it force you to be "nice" and "safe" and friendly and can't even reject those annoying companions
 
Ah classic Bitchendo move, however Kimishima did the "prevention" method to scare reviewers that if they won't give new Zelda - at that time - "10/10" then their reviews will be taken down or maybe even sued.
Not super interested in bickering over Dragon Age, but do you have a source for this bit? Somewhat interested in reading more about it.
 
Not super interested in bickering over Dragon Age, but do you have a source for this bit? Somewhat interested in reading more about it.
Unfortunately only to some extend at the moment.
First of all the sole fact that Zelda would get in "these times" a 10/10 review is already suspicious but doesn't exhaust the argument "Nintendo is behind this" by itself, yes.
I remember however that at some point of time Angry Joe refused to review the game AND talked about it somewhere that he won't do that because he is afraid - well maybe "worried" is more accurate word - that Nintendo will take down the review IF it won't be 10/10 all sparks and flowers.
I will try to dig it up from the Internet, just must find the digital shovel for the job.

EDIT #1 - For the love of with the Internet... I can relatively easly find topics with questions that hint somewhat that the problem existed at least back then but I can't find the exact article which is very odd.

EDIT #2 - Not exactly related... but at the same time it kinda is related in the sense of "bigger picture". When people downloaded Zelda TotK, Nintendo hunted down most if not all of them in the beginning with lawsuit for "stealing" the game. It's a bit of supportive evidence that Nintendo is quite mad in the sense that ANYTHING that doesn't match their world view is automatically labelled as "THIEVERY! AAA! WE MUST TAKE THEM TO THE COURT! THEY ARE LITERALLY KILLING US! AAA!" kind of behavior... Huh, it kinda looks like every second or so "anti-cheat" rootkit found mostly in gacha games.
 
Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Sign up
Review cover
Product Information:
  • Release Date (NA): October 31, 2024
  • Release Date (EU): October 31, 2024
  • Publisher: Electronic Arts
  • Developer: BioWare
  • Genres: Action RPG
  • Also For: PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S
Game Features:
Single player
Local Multiplayer
Online Multiplayer
Co-operative

Reviews

  1. The Mobapad N1 aims to shake up the third-party Nintendo Switch Pro controller market with NFC and HD rumble!

  2. The mini PC trend continues further, as we test out the Chuwi Larkbox X.

  3. A stylish controller packed with unique features, we check out Manba’s latest revision to their flagship product!

  4. Slitterhead is the debut title from Bokeh Game Studio which is headed by Keiichiro Toyama, the creator of Siren, Silent Hill, and Gravity Rush. This supernatural action-horror game introduces...

  5. The Game Boy Color gets a remake.

Site & Scene News

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Biblically.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Make Temp Bust Again
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Make GBAtemp the biggest cummunity
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Cum unity.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    She is speedrunning how much she can scam out of her fans. This is what fame does to a mofo.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    People didn't expect her to pump-and-dump them.
    +2
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    people never expect to be pump and dumped
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    people are stupid
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    people don't truly understand what a pump and dump is they think "i just need to sell before it dumps"
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Sex.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    People don't understand crypto is inherently worthless and expect any new coin to come out to explode the way Bitcoin did. Protip: they won't.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's not an investment opportunity, it's a lottery. It's a ticket with a very very very small chance of winning big, and an almost certainty of losing.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    So if you want to dabble in crypto, buy a dollar's worth and wait. Don't fucking "invest" in it, it's literally nothing.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    you can invest in the "trusted" cryptocurrencies
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    everything else is not worth it
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but people don't wanna invest, they wanna get rich quick
  • A @ anotherthing:
    I'm one of those crazy paranoid people who think bitcoin is only valuable while they need the processing power of all those miners.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    You can't invest in trusted cryptocurrencies, they are all too volatile.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    100 bucks (or whatever) for a small chance to get rich seems worth it to a lot of people
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    you say that but on average they have only been going up
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    what people don't get is investing is a long term commitment, you can't sell at the first dip
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    that's how you lose money
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    and "get rich quick" schemes never work
    The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye: and "get rich quick" schemes never work