honestly, it doesn't really matter to me, I didn't like how the government had to step in and tell us what we can and can't limit, now that that ruling is gone, maybe we can start getting rid of all the stupid taxes, and maybe, just maybe, increase the standard of living by having a lot less taxes and a lot less government intervention.
Threads like this are always expected to be absurd.
Lower taxes and less government intervention don't increase quality of life, higher wages and more government intervention increases quality of life. It isn't rocket science, government intervention means individuals can't ignore public interests in the pursuit of profits above all else i.e. polution and worker safety, and lower taxes means less money for public projects like roads and functioning sewers and ideally public health care like they have everywhere else in the world. That is how societies work~
A rare instance of me approving of your post. Morality isn’t objective, it is socially constructed. Different people have very different ideas on what is and isn’t moral. As far as our moral compass is concerned, we generally agree on some baseline things, but differ wildly when it comes to the details.
It CAN mean a lot to some people, however those are unlikely to be seeking an abortion.
No exceptions... and by that, I mean every conservative leaning individual in this thread is a selfish ignorant and short sighted misogynistic bag of fecal matter. This is literally the beginning of a wave of preventable tragedies for no good reason.
I can increase the number to 100 million eggs. It still doesn't change the outcome. They aren't equal to even a single person.
Fertilized egg means it is from a couple who has tried to conceive. It certainly has value for the couple. Hundreds of couples´ hope vs a few years at the end of sb´s life.
That was not my point.
I myself, am somewhat conservative but I do not support the abortion ban, I think it destroys freedom
That's the fun thing about hypotheticals. They can be changed to further a point any time. Let's say that instead of an old man, it's a small kid. I'd like to hope that you'd choose the little kid instead of a bunch of fertilized eggs. By your logic, the case has more years of life than the kid, so you'd let it burn for the hope of kids that don't yet exist.
It depends. If it´s Baby Hitler, i´d choose the suitcase. If the suitcase is full of supremacist titan_tim fetuses, i`d save an old man who is has less than a minute to live.
Sad dodge. But the if baby = _____ person argument, then it could go either way. You may have just let the child who becomes the doctor who cures cancer. It's a pointless thing to bring up.
@
RedColoredStars:
@
RedColoredStars:
@
RedColoredStars:
@
SylverReZ:
@
SylverReZ:
] 