This is you saying that it has no value to society, then when called out, you asked me "when does it have value?" as if rephrasing it as a question makes your initial claim less nihilistic.
You also left out the part where my original quote was in reference to the comment on living in a capitalistic society, where everything has an inherent value. You've taken what I've said out of context to try and further discredit my point.
Since some advanced parsing needs to be made so you can catch up with the rest of the class, let's break it down like this:
In America, a capitalistic society where everything inherently is designated value based on it's contribution to said society, a baby has no value. Babies contribute nothing to society, and only exist as a potential product. Is that a morally good way to exist? No, but that's a problem with society, another thread.
A baby further only has value to those who care about it. We can argue all day whether life intrinsically is valuable on it's own or not, but that's a religious argument for another thread. In the confines of this thread, a baby holds no current value aside from it's immediate family, and maybe some friends of the family. It's life is completely meaningless to everyone else who doesn't hold the view that they can profit from it some way later in it's life.
With that being said, if you or anyone else cares about the baby outside of religious influence, it's because you see the potential value of it later on, and most likely it's monetary based. You can't say it could be a great leader, because we've had both Obamas (good) and Hitlers (bad). And if the only reason you see a baby being of value is because it might contribute later, that's deplorable. But then again, that's why Republicans want control. They see people as products, nothing more. You, nor anyone in your platform, have no sympathy or care for the babies at hand, you only care about the future you think it will have. That's apparent in your complete disregard for the type of environment the baby is born into. Sure, it's not your problem, but your blanket perspective nullifies the main scenario babies who aren't wanted are born into.
Sorry if that wasn't "parsed" enough, but I shouldn't have to pander to someone who's proven multiple times that if anyone is on the spectrum, it's them. How many times now have you shown your inability to interact on a social basis with your continued attempts at ignoring questions and context in favor of having one sided arguments? You make jest as if being on the spectrum is a stigma; between that and your control issues, you're more of an asshole than I am
If you tell me, flat out, that you are on the spectrum, I'll let you be to run around doing as you please--with no further commentary.
Well that's not nearly as entertaining as arguing with those less mentally capable.
Other people said stuff. So it was a heated response? A rebuttal would do better.
Semantics again. It's almost like you enjoy being proven wrong, but then have this weird inability to admit to it.
@
HiradeGirl:
@
NinStar:
