You seem to have missed my point. I didn't say it was happening now. I was showing how
@N7Kopper's analogy comparing abortion and slavery was backwards.
Except is still isn't.
Whether or not you agree with the recent Supreme Court ruling, access to abortion was a legal right women had in this country until now. This also sets a precedent for any bodily autonomy right being infringed upon.
No it isn't. No rights were taken away.
You're the one who implied that anti-abortion laws were no big deal because a woman could just go to another state. I explained how you were mistaken.
And I explained on what to do. People just like to make excuses in order to never take responsibility.
- Protection is not 100% effective.
- Access to contraception is not equal in this country.
- Right-wing politicians in this country have made access to contraception and safe sex education more difficult in this country.
- Whether or not a woman uses contraception is irrelevant to whether or not she should have a right to bodily autonomy.
1. It's still pretty damn effective. If you're that scared, then don't fuck. Simple.
2. Um, yes it is. Not sure where you get that.
3. Replace with left-wing then it's actually true.
4. Not really. It's the persons responsibility to make their own decisions regarding how they have or don't have sex. If it's the women's choice, why are you so concerned? It's not your business now, is it?
- Sex is a biological drive comparable to the biological drives for food or water.
- Whether or not a woman has sex is irrelevant to whether or not she should have a right to bodily autonomy.
1. It's not my fault people can't control how damn horny they get. A person can go through life without having sex once. It's actually not needed for a person's personal survival. The body needs food and water. Outside of making sure humanity exists for another generation, you won't die if you don't fuck.
2. No is isn't.
As I have already explained, that's an impossibility for many women if they care about keeping their jobs, taking care of their families, or having time/money for other things.
And as I have explained, it's not my problem if people make poor choices then don't have the time to fix those choices.
- Whether or not something is "your problem" is irrelevant to whether or not it's an injustice and/or deplorable. I'm sorry this is how you view the world.
- Thank you for the admission that this is about sex.
1. No it's not.
2. It's about protecting human life. I know you can't see beyond yourself so it's easy to mistake.
Nope.
Nah.
I was showing how
@N7Kopper's analogy comparing abortion and slavery was backwards. Slavery in the US included examples when slave-owners would violate the bodily autonomy of their slaves, and restricting access to legal abortion is also a violation of bodily autonomy rights. That's all.
Well maybe I misunderstood? It's hard to keep up when 500 posts show up at once, but I try, as anyone would. I have a life outside here that take priority as well.
That's what makes it an analogy.
And it's still not the same.
Many states have made it so women cannot get legal abortions. Whether or not other states allow abortion access is irrelevant for the reasons I've already stated.
No it isn't.
The point was that both are examples of someone's bodily autonomy rights being violated.
Do you believe the state should be allowed to violate a person's bodily autonomy rights?
No I don't, but no rights are being violated since you can still get abortions.
"They can still get abortions". And slaves could still run away. You know what happens when they get caught? Death. You know what's on the docket for a lot of these red states should a woman get caught getting an abortion? Death. Can't make this up bruh. And you can't call it protecting life if you're endangering the life of the woman involved.
Pfft HAHAHAHAHA You're unreal. I mean, what reality do you live in?
How does the argument fall flat? Some states outlaw abortion on pain of, at worst, death. Just because some states allow abortion doesn't mean the argument falls flat, you just wish it does because arguing against it shows the issue pro lifers have with control.
It falls flat because it's bullshit.
There it is again, that control thing. What is it with you people wanting to control everyone else just because their views are different than yours? You people haven't been happy since the slaves were freed.
If it's about control, then why can't you or all the other left wing nut jobs let this go? Roe v. Wade is overturned, get over it. Move on. Live life. Instead you wanna reee and screech every time you don't get your way, and threaten to burn down business and murder people on top of that. No rights has been taken away. You can still walk outside and live your life the same as before. Don't talk about control when it's your side who wants to force their twisted views on the masses who don't want it. Like it or not, you are the twisted minority, and we're not backing down to you anymore.