• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Roe V Wade has been repealed

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,529
Country
United States
Then there’s a fundamental disagreement regarding the function of firearms as a prerequisite for a free society. Liberty isn’t free, the right to bear arms is fundamental and cannot be infringed as it protects the populace from the whims of a tyrannical government as well as internal and external threats.
We're witnessing the second amendment absolutists cheer human rights being stripped away as we speak. It's at best a vestigial freedom if it's not properly utilized when tyrants decide to drop the mask.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,824
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,821
Country
Poland
We're witnessing the second amendment absolutists cheer human rights being stripped away as we speak. It's at best a vestigial freedom if it's not properly utilized when tyrants decide to drop the mask.
A court error is being corrected. It wasn’t a right to begin with, as it’s not covered by the Constitution in any way. The court made a mistake in the past and it’s correcting that mistake now. If you believe that access to abortion should be a right, it needs to be codified accordingly, not fraudulently legislated from the bench.

Atta boy, keep those delusions piling up :rofl2:
You live up to your name, no offense.
 
Last edited by Foxi4,
  • Like
Reactions: Glyptofane

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,824
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,821
Country
Poland
Which is just another way of saying a human right was taken away from roughly half the country. It doesn't matter what bureaucratic language you want to dress it up in, the intent of the decision remains malicious.
The SCOTUS decides what is and is not enshrined in the Constitution. Abortion isn’t. The court is correctly fulfilling its function. You should petition Congress to do things right next time instead of weaponising the SCOTUS to pass otherwise inconvenient legislation.
 

NoobletCheese

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
533
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
1,083
Country
United States
Then we have a fundamental disagreement regarding the function of firearms as a prerequisite for a free society. Liberty isn’t free, the right to bear arms is fundamental and cannot be infringed as it protects the populace from the whims of a tyrannical government as well as internal and external threats.

This actually isn't my core reasoning for being against civilian disarmament. My reasoning is that the burden is on the gov't to prove I'm a threat to others, and they have failed to do so. Just like they failed to prove I'm a Covid threat to others, so they don't get to revoke my bodily autonomy wrt drugs, so why would they get to revoke it wrt guns. To any confused vax zealots reading this: the gov't's failure to prove I'm a Covid threat to others stems from the fact that others can protect themselves from me with three vaccines, PPE, social distancing, me getting tested, me being asymptomatic, me having natural vaccine from prior infection, me being not significantly more likely to transmit covid than a vaccinated person, me being part of a small cohort which they have a lower chance of encountering in the wild, and probably more things I can't think of right now.
 

Elodain

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
216
Trophies
0
Age
30
Location
Mi
XP
389
Country
United States
Which is just another way of saying a human right was taken away from roughly half the country
That's something you have top take up with your state. Not the Supreme Court.

SC Didn't take anything away from anybody. If you live in a conservative state, yeah, you'll lose the ability to have abortions, that's to be expected. Same as how the expected outcome in Liberal states is for abortion to continue to be allowed. That's the states fault if they take the right from you, not the Supreme Court. You're blaming the Supreme Court for doing it's job and leaving things that aren't covered by the federal constitution/law to the individual states.
 

NoobletCheese

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
533
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
1,083
Country
United States
Yeah, the delusion that America is a "free society", and even more so than all the other countries that don't have horrendous gun problems.

USA ranks around 10th worldwide in terms of mass shootings on average per capita. To get a more favourable figure you'd have to use median instead of average, but I don't know if morality scales like that -- 1 big mass shooting every 10 years (eg. Norway) isn't necessarily any "better" than lots of small ones over 10 years.
 

hippy dave

BBMB
Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,858
Trophies
2
XP
28,907
Country
United Kingdom
That's something you have top take up with your state. Not the Supreme Court.

SC Didn't take anything away from anybody. If you live in a conservative state, yeah, you'll lose the ability to have abortions, that's to be expected. That's the states fault, not the Supreme Court. You're blaming the Supreme Court for doing it's job and leaving things that aren't covered by the federal constitution/law to the individual states.
The structure of the American legal system would be entirely hilarious if it weren't constantly causing nightmarish problems for innocent people.
 

MariArch

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2021
Messages
368
Trophies
0
Age
23
XP
1,745
Country
United States
Everything I like = human right
🤔

I find it funny when the left says that now that they don't like this decision, it's time to change the rules and expand the supreme court. As if any conservative states would listen to the supreme court ever again once they rig the system and impose top down. Control lol. Spoiler alert. If they ever did that. Every conservative state would become a sanctuary state for the second amendment, prolifers, etc. And it wouldn't surprise me if a national split occurs and or if there's a civil war.
 
Last edited by MariArch,

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,824
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,821
Country
Poland
This actually isn't my core reasoning for being against civilian disarmament. My reasoning is that the burden is on the gov't to prove I'm a threat to others, and they have failed to do so.
I mentioned that in a later post - the few shouldn’t be punished for the sins of the many. I didn’t do anything wrong, there’s no justification to penalise me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoobletCheese

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,529
Country
United States
The SCOTUS decides what is and is not enshrined in the Constitution.
Obviously that's become secondary to overturning settled law for this activist conservative court, their interpretation of the constitution will simply become more and more creatively fascist without any checks or balances on their power.

That's something you have top take up with your state. Not the Supreme Court.
It remains a federal issue, especially now that we'll have people who must cross state lines to access abortion services.

SC Didn't take anything away from anybody. If you live in a conservative state, yeah, you'll lose the ability to have abortions, that's to be expected. Same as how the expected outcome in Liberal states is for abortion to continue to be allowed. That's the states fault if they take the right from you, not the Supreme Court. You're blaming the Supreme Court for doing it's job and leaving things that aren't covered by the federal constitution/law to the individual states.
Yeah it doesn't work that way, SCOTUS still gets the blame for giving authoritarians the opportunity to oppress women, because they're fully aware that opportunity will be seized upon. It's still fascism no matter how much they try to pass the buck.
 

MariArch

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2021
Messages
368
Trophies
0
Age
23
XP
1,745
Country
United States
Obviously that's become secondary to overturning settled law for this activist conservative court, their interpretation of the constitution will simply become more and more creatively fascist without any checks or balances on their power.


It remains a federal issue, especially now that we'll have people who must cross state lines to access abortion services.


Yeah it doesn't work that way, SCOTUS still gets the blame for giving authoritarians the opportunity to oppress women, because they're fully aware that opportunity will be seized upon. It's still fascism no matter how much they try to pass the buck.
hitlerbook.jpg


Lol. The word fascism literally has no meaning anymore. grats guys.
 

pustal

Yeah! This is happenin'!
Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
1,560
Trophies
2
Location
Emerald Coast
Website
web.archive.org
XP
6,173
Country
Portugal
It corrects the court’s error and provides impetus for proper legislation to be created regarding the issue. Congress has been napping this entire time, decades, relying on a SCOTUS decision that was always on shaky ground. It’s their fault, if anyone’s, that this situation is taking place.

Of course, but you think now that'll change?
 

NoobletCheese

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
533
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
1,083
Country
United States
It's still fascism no matter how much they try to pass the buck.

It's only fascism if the moral status of the fetus is trivial.

If the fetus has a soul, then we would both agree it would be wrong to kill it. In that case it would be an empirical dispute about whether the fetus has a soul, which is not a moral dispute, and so we don't have to be at eachother's throats.
 

osaka35

Instructional Designer
Global Moderator
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
3,740
Trophies
2
Location
Silent Hill
XP
5,951
Country
United States
Incredibly disappointing. The majority opinion stated they're going after other rights next. specifically, trying to get rid of lgbtq+ individuals' proper human rights, and get rid of the right to contraceptives. Expect also the right to privacy to be attacked. The descent of the US into religious tyranny continues unabated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    ButterScott101 @ ButterScott101: +1