Nope. Because you think, and want, the whole thing to disappear.Both of you have promoted for more restrictions, while I have not. Isn't that ironic?
Nope. Because you think, and want, the whole thing to disappear.Both of you have promoted for more restrictions, while I have not. Isn't that ironic?
And here comes the racist "argument".
Well done, you're checking all the RepubliKKKan checkboxes! You must be a Proud Boy.
Noted how I'm not the only one not American but you singled me out with your xenophobic drivel.
First of all, your nonsense about a foetus being a baby. Not the same, and you know it. In fact I doubt you'd be able to distinguish a human foetus from a pig one.
Secondly, your nonsensical idea of people having to "suffer the consequences of sex" because they implicitly consented to them. First of all, you're a creep for thinking that. Secondly, humans aren't breeding cows. We can reproduce because virtually all living things can reproduce, some without sex. If the Lord made it so enjoyable, it was certainly to motivate us to reproduce and multiply, but First and foremost for us to enjoy.
No one believes this nonsense, you pro-birther xenophobe.Your nationality isn't a race. It's a representation of what government you are beholden too. If your government has a history with another government, I don't think that is not notable. I don't know what "race" you are, or if you even have one.
There is no "meaning", just you being a disingenous liar relying on falsehoods to promote images that aren't real.If you cannot decipher the meaning behind the suggestion that a fetus is a baby to the expecting-mother and a fetus is a clump of cells to someone who wants to rationalize an abortion, then you are lost on this one. It was commentary about two groups are irreconcilable
You're ridiculous. These are your own words. If you're eating them back, fine, but at least admit it.I never said someone should have to "suffer the consequence of sex". I've only gone as far to say that they do. How they be allowed to manage it hasn't been in my interest of dictating. What I have said is not at odds with reality.
You're ridiculous. These are your own words. If you're eating them back, fine, but at least admit it.
Is it your intention to be a backpedaling xenophobic hypocrite?I searched this whole forum and your posts are the first two that said it, and then one of mine for quoting you.
Is it your intention to look unhinged?
Is it your intention to be a backpedaling xenophobic hypocrite?
Point out what? You literally told me to stay out of American politics because I'm not American, that's kinda xenophobic innit.Point it out.
I know that "RebupliKKKunts" have been trying to gaslight you for years. Have they succeeded?
That's funny, I don't recall saying that. I think you need to eat more fish, it does wonders for brainpower.I know that "RebupliKKKunts" have been trying to gaslight you for years. Have they succeeded?
Point out what? You literally told me to stay out of American politics because I'm not American, that's kinda xenophobic innit.
That's funny, I don't recall saying that. I think you need to eat more fish, it does wonders for brainpower.
I think that even if you ingested shark-like quantities of fish you'd stay the same dimwit you are.Nah. Right Wingers, Republikkan, RepubliKKKunts. Whatever. Don't worry about my fish diet.
We do not live in a vacuum, what happens even on the other side of the world has consequences.Neither of us have a say on American politics or its policy. Otherwise, we, and maybe our countries, are "interfering".
Apology and concession accepted. Maybe.I did edit the message, because I realized that you would be more "triggered" than predisposed to understanding what was said.
Depends on WHICH arguments we're talking about.Maybe it's okay to interact with the philosophy, rhetoric, and the logic of the current arguments?
Apology and concession accepted. Maybe.
I haven't "promoted" for more restrictions, I've said I'm open to discussions.You say you are holding me accountable to my arguments. Can you point out what you disagree with, or specifically why?
Both of you have promoted for more restrictions, while I have not. Isn't that ironic?
So trolling.Show me where I am anti abortion. @smf has proven to be more anti abortion than I. I argue ethics and logical arguments, but I don't condemn anyone orwishpromote for them to be ruled over.
wait, so you're trying to insult me? nice try kiddo.Republicans think you should get paid what you're worth, you are republican and on minimum wage.
Maybe you should hold back a little about your personal life.wait, so you're trying to insult me? nice try kiddo.
i'm moving to a different job soon, I was laid off a few months earlier and had to take this job to tide me over while I found a new job.
i mean as long as it doesn't identify me it doesn't matter.Maybe you should hold back a little about your personal life.
It's not often a direct reflection of your beliefs.
...No matter how ill conceived...
I've said I'm open to discussions.
So trolling.
You certainly seem to condemn people with your arguments.
Then why are you here?And I'm not. Understand?
That is mighty thoughtful of you.I think a couple people here are idiots and irresponsible, but I haven't condemned anyone for getting an abortion.
Consent isn't the proper word and Slavery would be a better analogy. See The Handmaid's TaleThe reason "consent" was brought up in the first place was because it was a key difference in the forced organ donation vs enforced carry-to-term analogy.
Then why are you here?
That is mighty thoughtful of you.
Consent isn't the proper word and Slavery would be a better analogy. See The Handmaid's Tale