-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
U.S. Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision
- Thread starter Ericzander
- Start date
- Views 74,838
- Replies 1,931
- Likes 9
And yet all that is happening is you've created a laughing stock of yourself.
Do you really lack that amount of self awareness?
Except that is, as you've been repeatedly told, not scientifically accurate.
So your argument is at best circular.
I asked a question about who gets to make the determination that babies are being killed, and you didn't answer me. The argument that it's a heartbeat that makes them babies is a separate issue. Would you like to try again?
On that topic, a mindless automaton can have a heartbeat. Other animals can have heartbeats. A zygote doesn't have a heartbeat. Could you clarify? Your positions seem wildly inconsistent.
It's difficult for you to force people to give you want you want, because of you.
A bad faith troll crying because I wouldn't let myself be trolled, priceless.
It's the best time to have qualified discussions. Not to let misinformation professionals poison the debate.
Maybe you need to re-read as it seems you understood nothing?
Yeah sorry, this is a pointless point to make. Decisions need to be made now and long-term thinking shouldn't rely on vacuous possibilities.
He doesn't care because the false rhetoric of "killing babies" is a powerful manipulation tool which works well on imbeciles.
I thought that, now I'm thinking he is just an imbecile that has been manipulated.
Again, not knowing what is going on in the thread is not self awareness.
Your position is not likely more correct, that is just you assuming that you're right because you think you're right.
"Self-awareness is the ability to focus on yourself and how your actions, thoughts, or emotions do or don't align with your internal standards. If you're highly self-aware, you can objectively evaluate yourself, manage your emotions, align your behavior with your values, and understand correctly how others perceive you."
And if the science changes, I will support it.
I don't necessarily disagree with you there, however I feel that particular point, birth control, is hugely fabricated by uneducatable pro lifers, and that's not fair to the women who get one for a "valid reason".
Don't worry about it. I apologize for my offense. It's a forum. We're all going to come across a little off.
I 100% agree babies do, but we're not talking about babies here. Please keep up
There's more to a chance at life than just existing. There's being supported, having access to education, healthcare, and the right to life safely. And America cannot offer these things right now unless you belong to a higher class. If this were REALLY about babies, and not about controlling women, you people would worry about their life, not their birth.
Similar threads
-
- Locked
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Veho:
Illinois is working to ban toxic food additives that have been banned for decades in other countries; additives that can be replaced and all those countries still have Skittles and Mountain Dew. Title of the piece: GUBMINT WANTS TO TAKE AWAY YOUR CANDY
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Veho, Sounds and smells like bullshit. They don't give you cancer, and California should know that. I don't get why they stick labels that say "may or may not cause reproductive harm or cancer". -
-
-
-
-
