My point is that I'm pro choice for a number of male-centric reasons. I'm not gonna pretend I have a bleeding heart for women, or that I want to win the Mother Therese prize. Because despite the pretentious nonsense the right-wingers and libertarians of this thread are spouting (you know, the people clucthing FREEDUMB to their chest but then all too happy to curtail the freedom of OTHERS to make decisions of their own goddamn body - same people who were crying out bloody murder for masks and vaccines, yet somehow think that 9-months pregancies and a lifetime of support are A-OK to accept without appeal), perfectly valid reasons exist.
First of all, nutcases do exist. In my line of work I've seen more than a couple guys, or girls, DELIBERATELY sabotaging condoms by way of puncturing them, in order to trap their partner with a pregnancy, AKA "stealthing", which is in fact a crime but that's beside the point. Now, where I come from, the right to refuse paternity (or maternity) does exist BUT the other parent can (and usually does) demand a judge to legally recognise the other parent, with the obvious consequences of pecuniary obligations (which can also be applied RETROACTIVELY). So, if the woman does it, it's usually tough luck, as you can't force a woman to abort (just like you shouldn't force her to carry out a pregnancy) and stealthing is exceedingly difficult to prove without a confession, but if it's the man doing the entrapping, a woman should have the possibility of getting out that pregnancy, and trap, without having to justify herself to a bunch of bigots.
Secondly, there are medical reasons. I am allergic to latex, which means that all condoms, even latex-free ones which are always a 50-50 gamble at best, can be uncomfortable, or worse. Now, in my teen years, I blitzed through the pain, but in my adulthood, I'm nowhere as inclined to feel that - but I'm also not inclined to give up sex. Does that mean I should be having a kid every time I have sex? Thankfully, other techniques exist (reliable ones, not crazy like a friend of mine does who simply pulls out, even if it has worked for him until now) but even so, the absolute mahority of them require girl compliance. I'm sure there's plenty of guys (and girls) who share my same predicament.
Thirdly, even if this should be pretty obvious, while accidental parents can be great and voluntary parents can be absolutely shitty, there is the undeniable fact that WANTING a child should be one of the first, if not THE first, factor(s) to consider when deciding whether a pregnancy needs to go forward or not. And this is true for fathers and mothers. If you believe in Christianity, for example, you'll recall that God created life and the universe as an act of WILL, not because He accidentally jizzed the cosmic void. Therefore the whole idea of banning abortion is anti-christian, in addition to illogical, because it's really difficult to imagine parents who are coaxed into being parents embracing their role with enthusiasm and no regrets.
it's really difficult to provide substantial answers to your incel-inspired nonsense, but I hope the above paragraphs provided some perspective that goes beyond your comically-sized nose, or arse, whichever is used in your native language to imply perspective and lack thereof.
It won't take much for a RepubliKKKunt-dominated legislature to enact it. The fact that such a law exists is an aberration. Even worse that it's the party of "less government" to do so. You know, same party talking about freedoms who is currently deciding what kids can and cannot read. Right-wingers are hypocrites and a blight on society.
