Smoking crack is, objectively, a poor life choice.
Crack will wreck you regardless of whether you're white, black, brown or magenta.
What you meant to say was overwhelming support of black politicians 25 years ago. 25 years ago half of our user base wasn't even a twinkle in their papa's eye, but let's pretend that's modern. The sentencing disparity you saw in the 90's was overwhelmingly caused by the 1994 crime bill which, in turn, was constructed in association with black mayors all across the country.
Those are some very nice opinions. The facts, on the other hand, show overwhelming support for the bill - it passed through the Senate with *one* Nay.
And that has to do with discrimination based on race in the law how? The law is equally binding for the wealthy and the poor. I fully understand that you'd prefer to apply law differently depending on the pyramid of victimhood, along the lines of "intersectional" policies, and pretend that this "equitable" approach is fair, but it's not - it de facto creates people who are equal and people who are equal-er in the eyes of the justice system.
I said it once, I will say it again. Name one provision in common law that applies differently to people based on their skin tone, and *explicitly so*, so that this argument doesn't take forever. It should be a simple task. You made a bold claim, now provide a citation.