"Safe" is subjective. What you deem "Safe" doesn't meet my threshold or concerns. It's as simple as having higher standards than you based on the same information.
-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Covid-19 vaccine
- Thread starter x65943
- Start date
- Views 243,535
- Replies 4,123
- Likes 10
- Status
"Safe" is subjective. What you deem "Safe" doesn't meet my threshold or concerns. It's as simple as having higher standards than you based on the same information.
According to Israel, Pfizer is 88% effective against hospitalization, 91% against severe illness, but only 39% effective in preventing infection from Delta, which we are now being told presents as the same viral load in vaxxed as unvaxxed, so the very large pool of vaxxed carriers would presumably still be spreading it like wildfire and harboring mutations if any of it anywhere is to be believed.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/23/del...ective-in-israel-prevents-severe-illness.html
Yepp, that's why a new booster is coming this fall against the Delta. Both Moderna and Pfizer apparently have it fixed. For sure, that's why so many people as possible should be vaxxed. Since a virus will die out without a host.
Then provide evidence to counter what I said. You seem to have ignored the part where I asked for evidence to be proven wrong. Why hasn’t anyone on the anti-vax side been able to prove evidence?
Same reason someone in Beijing can't prove Taiwan is a country. I don't care if your claims are true or not, has nothing to do with my decision not to get vaxed.
The reasons I don't get vaxed are true.
1) I am not using a product or services claiming a privilege of blanket indemnity, simplest safety metric in the world is "Will they take responsibility for it?". No? Well I am not going to trust their product more than they do.
2) Me and the people I care about continued on working and going about life normally, unaffected by Covid and neither myself or anyone I have concern for has any reasonable metric of risk.
3) I have no faith or belief in the integrity of this government so anything they claim is presumed to be a lie.
4) If it involves messaging, promotion, selfie frames, virtue signaling, censorship or any manner of social engineering from Big tech I am doing the opposite.
Because hundreds of unvaccinated Americans are dying from the virus daily. In addition, the fact that they're spreading the virus makes it more likely that there will be breakthrough infections among the vaccinated. Finally, spreading the disease makes it more likely new variants will appear that make the vaccines less effective.Perspective
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
It's a demonstrable fact that a.) These are the people who are getting seriously sick and dying from the disease, b.) These are the people spreading disease to other people, and c.) These are the people increasing the odds of there being more contagious and/or more deadly variants.
And yet it appears the vaccinated people are spreading the disease more than the unvaccinated.
You mean the totally legit evidence that was probably in no way manipulated at all in order to try to sway people with "truths" and not the "lies of the true numbers"? You're right, I've been wrong this whole time, stupid me.
If you have evidence that vaccinated people are "spreading the disease more than unvaccinated people," or you have any evidence that the presently available scientific studies have been at all "manipulated," I'd be interested to see it.
If you don't have evidence of these things, you're just making stuff up, and nobody should pay attention to you.
Amazing how you can come up with an "adjective fact" for people I gave not even the vaguest hint about their age, health or behaviors.
Imagining what's best for others...
Did you not see the video I posted or are you an "intellectual" who prefers to read, in which case, here.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/30/cdc...tts-covid-outbreak-were-fully-vaccinated.html
- That doesn't matter with regard to my point.
- There were two other points.
- This is not evidence that that the vaccinated are "spreading the disease more than the unvaccinated."
- This study is an anecdote.
Only a point if you care about other people, I don't concern myself with others peoples choices and consequences because it's not my business.
The uptick in home schooling and curtailing travel I consider a boon.
>provides source
>says it doesn't count
So that means I can disregard your and possible others "sources" if I don't agree with them huh? Gotcha.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Locked
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
RedColoredStars:
There is an actual trailer with footage too. lol. Going to watch it tonight. Grabbed it from... a place. -
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, JonTron's back yet again until he disappears into the void for another 6 or so months.+1 -
-
