• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Blue State coalition (CA) banning energy inefficient gaming PCs

r5xscn

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
317
Trophies
1
Location
On earth, somewhere
XP
2,274
Country
Antarctica
Interesting that they didn't ban consoles as well/instead, because those consumed more than twice the power of PCs in the same time frame.

I wonder what is your source on the power consumption of consoles being twice as much as PC.
PS5 power consumption:
https://www.thehomehacksdiy.com/how-much-electricity-power-does-a-ps5-use/
Idle 80W (a bit high but not double).
Games, 180W

2060 Super (similar processing power)
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super/30.html
GPU only,
Idle 8 W, (probably around 50~60W with the whole PC).
Games, 184 Watt (probably around 250w total).

I think the banned PC is based on I7 11900K and 3080 or higher. Those can consume 400w+ on average when gaming.
Now, let's see Switch, it consumes ~10W on handheld mode. Of course, the graphics are not comparable, but the power consumption is awesome.

Hopefully, future PC hardwares and consoles will be more power-efficient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,528
Country
United States
I wonder what is your source on the power consumption of consoles being twice as much as PC.
PS5 power consumption:
https://www.thehomehacksdiy.com/how-much-electricity-power-does-a-ps5-use/
Idle 80W (a bit high but not double).
Games, 180W

2060 Super (similar processing power)
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super/30.html
GPU only,
Idle 8 W, (probably around 50~60W with the whole PC).
Games, 184 Watt (probably around 250w total).

I think the banned PC is based on I7 11900K and 3080 or higher. Those can consume 400w+ on average when gaming.
Now, let's see Switch, it consumes ~10W on handheld mode. Of course, the graphics are not comparable, but the power consumption is awesome.

Hopefully, future PC hardwares and consoles will be more power-efficient.
To be fair, there are way more consoles (combined) in any given state than gaming PCs, so it makes sense that they drew more energy in the same time frame. Source is in the post you quoted, which itself quoted a press release I believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: r5xscn
D

Deleted User

Guest
I wonder what is your source on the power consumption of consoles being twice as much as PC.
PS5 power consumption:
https://www.thehomehacksdiy.com/how-much-electricity-power-does-a-ps5-use/
Idle 80W (a bit high but not double).
Games, 180W

2060 Super (similar processing power)
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super/30.html
GPU only,
Idle 8 W, (probably around 50~60W with the whole PC).
Games, 184 Watt (probably around 250w total).

I think the banned PC is based on I7 11900K and 3080 or higher. Those can consume 400w+ on average when gaming.
Now, let's see Switch, it consumes ~10W on handheld mode. Of course, the graphics are not comparable, but the power consumption is awesome.

Hopefully, future PC hardwares and consoles will be more power-efficient.
That my friend.
Is a extremely gross comparison. It's not even the actual regulation afaik. The machine needs to be ERP ready. Which basically means that rather than having all things in shutdown still semi powered. So usb ports, ethernet port and so on. That those are actually off. And the system while shutdown doesn't use anymore than 0.5 wats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: r5xscn

r5xscn

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
317
Trophies
1
Location
On earth, somewhere
XP
2,274
Country
Antarctica
That my friend.
Is a extremely gross comparison. It's not even the actual regulation afaik. The machine needs to be ERP ready. Which basically means that rather than having all things in shutdown still semi powered. So usb ports, ethernet port and so on. That those are actually off. And the system while shutdown doesn't use anymore than 0.5 wats.

I see. I am sorry that I did not check the regulation.

If it only checks the standby power, then it is definitely a flawed regulation. It should be just a BIOS option for the sleep states.
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
I say it's a gross comparison since your comparing a rtx 2060 super. Which is not the standard for power efficiency especially since the rtx 3060, same price MRSP. Draws at max 170 wats, with a higher performance ratio. I know your comparing performance but it's just not wise with the rtx 20 line.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I see. I am sorry that I did not check the regulation.

If it only checks the standby power, then it is definitely a flawed regulation. It should be just a BIOS option for the sleep states.
I'm sure there's more than that regulation wise. I'm still looking into it.
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
I see. I am sorry that I did not check the regulation.

If it only checks the standby power, then it is definitely a flawed regulation. It should be just a BIOS option for the sleep states.
Well the thing is, this was enacted in 2016. So DELL knew for a quite a long while.So the fact they weren't compliant is silly.
https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/14669/no-california-is-not-banning-gaming-pcs
here's a less click baity article.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

And the regulations only apply to sleep or idle, so indeed, should just be bios options, but that also means the hardware needs to support it, which as to why dell didn't do that is kinda dumb.
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Boywife
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
27,908
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,176
Country
Antarctica
Who is "harassing manufacturers"? No one is doing this (more people should, however). Why are you willingly defending one of the biggest tech companies in the world? This is goofy. Dell has more than enough to make slightly better Alienware computers that are compliant with regulations. They are a multi-billion dollar company, they have literally more money than the combined gdp of several countries. Blame Dell's greed. If they spent a tiny bit more on making better computers then this wouldn't be an issue. This is Dell's fault.
Jimbo just makes shit up only so he can be mad about something. Which seems to be a very common thing with a few other members.
 

Deleted member 559230

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 12, 2021
Messages
525
Trophies
0
XP
973
what's wrong with people

Some how the lawmakers in California and other blue states think that gaming PC's consume too much electricity when there's literally thousands of other devices, rigs, setups that consume way more. I'm not sure what motivated these idiots to try to ban power hungry computers, but like most policies that come out of that fucked up state it makes no damned sense. Fuck the lawmakers and fuck the policy. Just build your own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimbo13

ZeroT21

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2016
Messages
615
Trophies
0
XP
2,444
Country
United States
For lawmakers, being able to put a law they preach into effect is like some kinda badge of honor, regardless of consensus
 

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
The way this is written you can easily find loopholes around this. And you can be sure companies will devote time to finding and exposing those loopholes.

Companies can add unnecessary things the system doesn't need like extra ram and sata ports or pci-e slots to take advantage of the expandability score, instead of re-engineering the power supply.
 

Taleweaver

Storywriter
Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
8,689
Trophies
2
Age
43
Location
Belgium
XP
8,085
Country
Belgium
It's an interesting discussion. I'm all fine with regulating power limitations on pc's. As mentioned : this isn't going to put anyone out of business. And unless I'm reading things wrong, it's not like someone's going to just in your home to confiscate your pc.

It's just a bit one sided. I see one camp arguing over how little it impacts, how it should have been related a long time, that tech companies can easily apply, and so on.
... And a single other camp who's only argument is 'I just don't like the regulators'.
 

Jayro

MediCat USB Dev
Developer
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
12,964
Trophies
4
Location
WA State
Website
ko-fi.com
XP
16,974
Country
United States
I'm sorry, but I will consume any and all electricity that I pay for on my power bill. Nobody else needs to nanny my power usage. (Usually $55-$65 USD /mo, which ain't bad at all.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimbo13

KingVamp

Haaah-hahahaha!
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
13,485
Trophies
2
Location
Netherworld
XP
7,919
Country
United States
So they had time and yet still refuse to make better PCs? Just means companies with better PCs can fill that void instead.

I'm sorry, but I will consume any and all electricity that I pay for on my power bill. Nobody else needs to nanny my power usage. (Usually $55-$65 USD /mo, which ain't bad at all.)
Except this isn't about regulating your individual power usage. If anything, this could even lead to a lower power bill without even changing your lifestyle. This is about getting more efficient and more environmental friendly technology from companies that refuse to move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted User

jimbo13

Terry Crews #1 Fan
OP
Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
1,083
Trophies
0
XP
1,075
Country
United States
So they had time and yet still refuse to make better PCs? Just means companies with better PCs can fill that void instead.


Except this isn't about regulating your individual power usage. If anything, this could even lead to a lower power bill without even changing your lifestyle. This is about getting more efficient and more environmental friendly technology from companies that refuse to move on.

Real reach of opinion there considering some of the most efficient mini-atx systems don't meet the stupidity of the requirements.
 

jimbo13

Terry Crews #1 Fan
OP
Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
1,083
Trophies
0
XP
1,075
Country
United States
well that's one way to stop scalpers (at least for GPU's) indirectly

How would it do that? Considering it limits your options for buying a pre-built and will increase demand for self built since they aren't regulated the likely hood of needing a scalped card increases.
 

MikaDubbz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
3,846
Trophies
1
Age
36
XP
7,294
Country
United States
I blame the damn cryptocurrency miners spiking up all this wattage usage over the past few years with their dumb computers endlessly running code.
 

weatMod

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
3,305
Trophies
2
Age
47
XP
3,350
Country
United States
Yeah and also crypto miners. Can't crack down on them without potentially hurting gamers a bit, unfortunately.

Besides, all these pre-built sellers have to do is put better PSUs in their systems to become compliant, instead of cheap ones that explode or fail after a week despite being rated way over the necessary wattage for the other components.
pretty sure this was debunked
go to Elons twitter
the banking system, precious metal mining and many other things use a lot more energy than crypto

the real waste of energy is in the production of shitty Dell and alienware prebuilts in the first place
 
Last edited by weatMod,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: https://youtu.be/MddR6PTmGKg?si=mU2EO5hoE7XXSbSr