I would rather not waste my time.go do it make one about the Republican fails they have lots
I would rather not waste my time.go do it make one about the Republican fails they have lots
Republicans will accept anything from a Republican-controlled government, up to and including total dictatorship. Most Democrats are too spineless to enact sweeping, meaningful changes, which means they're never on the verge of succumbing to authoritarianism. Put simply: if we were going to revolt, we would've done it already, it requires a certain percentage of the populace to all be on the same page.We talking about US citizens in the future who decided to rebel again the government republican or Democrat
Pop quiz: a hundred thousand people with 9mm pistols versus one fully-manned stealth bomber, who wins? The US government has bombed and shot its own citizens any number of times throughout history, that's how confident they were that people wouldn't fight back. And they didn't.With how many guns people here have anyone that thinks they could not take on the government is as dumb as Biden
Republican fail threads already exist, such as the ones on the January 6 insurrection, Q-anon, pretty much anything the former president said/did, etc.go do it make one about the Republican fails they have lots
That one cuts deep into the hearts of MAGA Republicans.Pretty much anything the former president said/did, etc.
The unmanned stealth bomber?Pop quiz: a hundred thousand people with 9mm pistols versus one fully-manned stealth bomber, who wins?
This isn't a topic; it's a direct attack from the birth of the topic.I will appreciate that you did not come here to try and derail this Topic
And a weak attack at that. There's plenty about Biden's beliefs and history, not to mention gaffes, to levy legitimate criticisms at, but "BiDEn ThInKs yOU'd NeED oVeRWheLMiNg FOrCe tO TaKe dOWn tHe US mIliTArY" isn't among those.This isn't a topic; it's a direct attack from the birth of the topic.
True, true. He's correct that you would need extensive force, but why would someone be like "*snort* lmfao he thinks we need to try!" ???And a weak attack at that. There's plenty about Biden's beliefs and history, not to mention gaffes, to levy legitimate criticisms at, but "BiDEn ThInKs yOU'd NeED oVeRWheLMiNg FOrCe tO TaKe dOWn tHe US mIliTArY" isn't among those.
But they didn't. And they weren't close. Biden literally won fair and square several months ago.You need F15s and a nuke to take down Biden, but a handful of yokels and idiots taking selfies in the Capital Dome were totally about to overthrow the entire government
They didn't capture or kill a single Congressperson, even Mitt Romney who was slowest to react, so let's not overstate their accomplishments here. Ultimately all they did was destroy a whole lot of property, smear shit on the walls, and fly the confederate flag in the Capitol building, which is exactly the type of behavior you'd expect of yokels and idiots.You need F15s and a nuke to take down Biden, but a handful of yokels and idiots taking selfies in the Capital Dome were totally about to overthrow the entire government
They let them in and they still failed. Now image if they were doing their job or even if one congressperson was caught what the response would have been.They didn't capture or kill a single Congressperson, even Mitt Romney who was slowest to react, so let's not overstate their accomplishments here. Ultimately all they did was destroy a whole lot of property, smear shit on the walls, and fly the confederate flag in the Capitol building, which is exactly the type of behavior you'd expect of yokels and idiots.
And it certainly wasn't for lack of trying that they didn't kill any Congresspeople that day, as people were killed and explosives were found planted in several places.
God forbid this section host any actual discussion or news, nah let's just cater to the lowest common denominator and let Trump trolls post memes in multiple "own the libs" megathreads because that's all they're comfortable with.As to whether a thread about Joe Biden's various funny gaffes should or should not be allowed, I personally see no issue with it - if the man makes a fool of himself on national television and someone wishes to compile all those statements into one stand-up routine in which everyone except Joe Biden is laughing, God speed. With that being said, we'll wait and see what other moderators have to say on the matter, since such a thread is liable to generate flame wars and arguments, which we generally like to avoid.
Pretty sure that's what the "libs" have been doing for the last 4 years, I don't see why it shouldn't work both ways. All work and no play makes Xzi a dull boy - a little bit of levity is welcome in these dark times as far as I'm concerned.God forbid this section host any actual discussion or news, nah let's just cater to the lowest common denominator and let Trump trolls post memes in multiple "own the libs" megathreads because that's all they're comfortable with.
Yeah that's a bullshit justification, link me to the "Big President Trump Fail Compilation."Pretty sure that's what the "libs" have been doing for the last 4 years, I don't see why it shouldn't work both ways. All work and no play makes Xzi a dull boy - a little bit of levity is welcome in these dark times as far as I'm concerned.
Regardless of whether or not this thread should be locked, the title of this thread breaks the titling guidelines for this section. If it can't be retitled without completely changing the point of the thread, it should be moved to EoF.Joe Biden should probably stop talking about the second amendment throughout history, he's obviously not educated enough on the subject to have an opinion on it. Not only were cannons not restricted, the citizenry often owned newer, more effective weapons than the military. This is because military contracts are more concerned with reliability and value for money than being on the bleeding edge of technology. It was always significantly more important to order large quantities of easily serviceable weapons that produce repeatable results than to jump on the latest new mechanism, most of which were goofy and didn't stand the test of time. Anyone actually interested in the evolution of service rifles, or military-grade weaponry in general, should probably listen to an expert like Ian McCollum of Forgotten Weapons fame instead of this old codger. Joe's demonstrably wrong, and even fact-checkers won't side with him on this one.
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...dens-dubious-claim-about-revolutionary-war-c/
Regarding a potential conflict between U.S. citizens and the federal government, I'm leaning towards the citizens winning outright, on the proviso that the gross majority of the citizenry actually wanted to overthrow the government. The citizens have the military outnumbered to the tune of 300 to 1, and you can only do so much with "F15's". Historical record shows that the American military might is geared specifically to combat and dismantle opposing military forces, it is not equipped to combat guerilla fighters, and has rarely (if ever) succeeded in doing so. The conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq are still on-going - they can't even win in the dustbowl, let alone on their home turf where the military would be restricted from using their own toys. You don't "nuke" your own front lawn. Not that it matters anyway since it's not a realistic scenario.
As to whether a thread about Joe Biden's various funny gaffes should or should not be allowed, I personally see no issue with it - if the man makes a fool of himself on national television and someone wishes to compile all those statements into one stand-up routine in which everyone except Joe Biden is laughing, God speed. With that being said, we'll wait and see what other moderators have to say on the matter, since such a thread is liable to generate flame wars and arguments, which we generally like to avoid.
The politics and world news section was made for fair discussion.
While one individual user creates a thread - many users ultimately contribute to the discussion therein. In light of this,
please try to keep titles neutral and fact based. It's okay to state your opinions how you see fit in the body proper of your
opening post, but the titles should not be editorialized or overly sensational.
In the future please:
1. try to keep thread titles neutral and fact based
2. make it clear who or what is making a claim using words like "CNN claims" or "NY times reports"
Staff will not hesitate to remove threads or edit titles that do not meet these guidelines
If you have any questions please ask below or via PM
That's a separate issue that's already being discussed, the more important question we're debating as staff is whether the thread should exist at all given the fact that it's guaranteed to cause problems and flaming. One thing at a time.Regardless of whether or not this thread should be locked, the title of this thread breaks the titling guidelines for this section. If it can't be retitled without completely changing the point of the thread, it should be moved to EoF.
That's a separate issue that's already being discussed, the more important question we're debating as staff is whether the thread should exist at all given the fact that it's guaranteed to cause problems and flaming. One thing at a time.