"But did you read my propaganda on how federal regulations are not really federal regulations?"
“Democrats just voted to ban voter ID nationwide.”
When we asked for support for that claim, Lauren Fine, a spokeswoman for Scalise, told us: “The exceptions are so wide that it renders voter ID laws unenforceable and useless in the states that have it.”
Even though "H.R. 1 wouldn’t ban state laws that ask voters to show identification at the polls, as Scalise and others have said""..."there is an option for those who don’t have ID to offer a signed statement instead during federal elections." So it would just make ID laws unenforceable and useless like his office said when asked for supporting clarification. It's not a ban on the IDs themselves, but an effective ban on their enforcement. But we will ignore that and rate it as a false claim anyway.
"The second claim — also promoted by Republican lawmakers, such as Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York — isn’t true, either.
Stefanik took to Twitter to claim that the bill would: “Prevent removal of ineligible voters from registration rolls.”"
Just kidding. It's true.
"The bill would prohibit the use of one method for removing voters from the rolls -- which involves sending mass mailings to registered voters, then removing or challenging the registrations of voters for whom the mailings were returned as non-deliverable."
Oh, and allowing felons to vote? Who cares.
That's the gist of your post Lacius. Maybe you should give your politifact article a good read.
