Lol it tells me that page doesn't exist. But yeah every window busted out, buildings burnt, rioting and looting. Calling for justice is OK. When u break the law doing it that goes into a whole other category and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Just like trumps proud boys and their stupid ass "coupe" attempt you break the law you should pay. These people want to prosecute one side and give the other a free pass. Where was the fast flight response When the other side was burning and looting. Wait Noone wanted to order it due to fear of being called racist. You can no longer disagree with that side without being called a racist, nazi, or some other term your group has recently came up with. "Karen or Chad as you like to say." Isn't lumping a group of people "based on age and race" under one name still considered racist or does it not apply to your side? Calling out and associating groups of people to a specific term is racist no matter how you look at it.
ok this is an absolute mess
firstly, even if the total death tally in all BLM protests exceeds that of the riot,
this was one riot and it killed five people, as well as having clear violent intent the entire time
secondly, the "other side" WASN'T burning or looting for the most part
the vast majority of actual violence in the BLM protests was either from overzealous police escalating things (which was literally part of the problem the protests were protesting against) or from far-right lunatics deliberately instigating violence
thirdly, "you can no longer disagree with that side without being called a racist" is classic persecution-complex DARVO argument bullshit and we all know it- deny racism, verbally attack the protestors and then back down and act like
they're somehow persecuting you by protesting about being discriminated against
fourthly, Karen, Chad, etc. aren't based on age or race, they're personality descriptors
fifthly (is that even a word?), you're confusing racism with general bigotry, which makes it pretty clear you're just throwing around the term wildly with a side of tu quoque arguments as an excuse to blame the victim instead of actually caring about stopping racism (or stopping riots, for that matter)