D
Deleted User
Guest
I´m surprised no one here is talking about inauguration of Joe Biden on Wednesday, January 20, 2021.
-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States
- Thread starter yusuo
- Start date
- Views 433,165
- Replies 7,444
- Likes 45
- Status
Please provide the single best piece of specific evidence, not debunked claims of evidence. For example, if you're going to claim there's evidence of widespread dead people voting, please provide it.
....
American Thinker joins conservative outlets walking back voter fraud claims
soo... the only two "Evidence" you have left are
1. Members of the Seditious Coup..
2.
The 'dead people voting' one is the worst he could have possibly chosen. That isn't just lacking evidence, it's actually been disproven.
*Snip*
Last edited by Foxi4,
, Reason: Reply to a deleted post
Most of the 100,000+ protesters weren't rioting or trespassing. Protesting is a Constitutional right, regardless if you agree with why it's happening.
Last edited by Foxi4,
, Reason: Editing contents of quote
I know. I'm just making the point that claiming evidence isn't the same thing as providing evidence.
It's absolutely a fair system. The only system that makes sense. Otherwise the entire election is decided by just two states, California and Texas. Due to their population size. Making every other states votes useless. Not really fair is it. That's why the electoral college is in place.
And claiming there is no evidence isn't the same as there being no evidence
Last edited by Purple_Shyguy,
It's a good thing the burden of proof is on the person claiming there was widespread election fraud then.And claiming there is no evidence isn't the same as there being no evidence
I love it. We're right back to Creationist Fallacy thinking: "Well God exists because I say so and the burden of proof is on you to disprove God"
...Investigations have been made. Courts have been shown 'evidence'. How can you be so incredulously ignorant about what's going on in your own country?
Not only did Democrats not say "no" to investigations, but the investigations occurred, and no evidence of widespread voter fraud was found.
When all else fails, just claim suppression and censorship. Makes you laugh
"We hold these truths to be self evident, all men and women created by the.. go you know the you know the thing" - Joe Biden
don't forget to Bypass Censorship of Sedition.. RUN to Russia to helpWhen all else fails, just claim suppression and censorship. Makes you laugh
Failed to fetch tweet https://twitter.com/AdamSculthorpe/status/1350872780355596289
*Snip*
Last edited by Foxi4,
, Reason: Reply to a deleted post
When being "allowed" to investigate things like the Dominion voting machines it means they were allowed into a room to look at the outside of the machine. Refused to see internals, refused to see the code. They were completely obstructed and you're not clever by pretending you don't know.
Regardless of whether or not everyone there participated in the armed insurrection that was the invasion of the Capitol, it's anti-democratic to protest the results of a free and fair election, and they were still participating in Trump's attempted coup d'état. In other words, even if everything had been peaceful at the Capitol, those who were there perpetuated false and dangerous information about election fraud, and their goal was to persuade members of Congress to arbitrarily overturn the results of the election.
It should also be noted that over 200 subject case files have been opened in response to the armed insurrection at the Capitol, and they were there because Trump instigated it.
When multiple giant billionaire tech monopolies team up like a giant evil cabal to openly crush competition they don't like where should they go?
Oh no! Scary Russia! Edward Snowdens doing fine.
Not necessarily. It could be done a similar way to how the UK does it; still not outright decided by the numbers alone, but a lot closer; any winner has to win more than 50% of votes. Obviously, it can't work in the exact same way, but the current system could be massively improved upon.
This is a non-response.
*Snip*
Last edited by Foxi4,
, Reason: Reply to a deleted post
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
