Entertaining conspiracy theories and believing in them are two different beasts. People entertain conspiracy theories because there is already distrust.
If it is illogical, then don't do it. There is no "better definition of of illogical". It's not a spectrum. The word is "unlikely" If you want to invent your own conspiracy theory and then call it unlikely, then go ahead and do that.
While we are at it, let's not pretend that you even care about "evidence". What you want is "proof". Use the word "proof" instead of baiting people for evidence that you will never accept.
I'm free to believe what I believe, and think about what could have happened. I have plenty of reason to not trust the US government. I know what a conspiracy is. The question is, is it "unlawful" if there is no prosecution?
Alleging that Trump appointees from across the spectrum are behaving politically opposite of their appointments -- while committing felonies -- is a better definition of illogical
If it is illogical, then don't do it. There is no "better definition of of illogical". It's not a spectrum. The word is "unlikely" If you want to invent your own conspiracy theory and then call it unlikely, then go ahead and do that.
While we are at it, let's not pretend that you even care about "evidence". What you want is "proof". Use the word "proof" instead of baiting people for evidence that you will never accept.
I'm free to believe what I believe, and think about what could have happened. I have plenty of reason to not trust the US government. I know what a conspiracy is. The question is, is it "unlawful" if there is no prosecution?