Ryan Hernandez sentenced to 3 years in prison after hacking Nintendo and possessing illegal images

KPzB2Zh.png

The United States Department of Justice has released the ruling regarding the case against Ryan Hernandez, also known as RyanRocks. Earlier this year, the 21-year-old defendant was accused of and plead guilty to possessing over a thousand videos and images of child pornography, as well as stealing confidential information from Nintendo and distributing it to the public. This was not Hernandez's first offense--in 2016, when he was a minor, he had successfully phished the log in information from a Nintendo employee and used it to obtain documents and images about the Nintendo NX prior to its official reveal as the Nintendo Switch. This led to the FBI getting involved, to which they informed Hernandez that they knew of his activities, and advised him to not break the law again.

Hernandez did not listen, and proceeded to hack directly into Nintendo's servers in 2018 and 2019, even publicly showing off his skills to others on social media. Once more, the FBI visited his home in June 2019, arresting Hernandez after seizing his computers and hard drives, finding hundreds of stolen Nintendo documents and "over a thousand" explicit pictures and videos of minors. During his hearing in January 2020, Hernandez plead guilty to both counts, and today, he has been sentenced to three years in a prison designed for inmates "with cognitive challenges".

Additionally, Hernandez must pay $259,323 in restitution to Nintendo for damages.

:arrow: Source
 

SpencerlyEverly

Spencer Everly
Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
272
Trophies
0
Location
Central City, KY
Website
www.youtube.com
XP
1,046
Country
United States
Lessons will never be learned... while I don’t know Ryan personally (Just from his probably dead YT channel n’ stuff) I knew something like this will happen after that E3 Zelda: BoTW thing.

Honestly as for me, on the child porn thing, he should’ve been in jail for longer due to that. -_-
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
2,577
Trophies
2
XP
3,799
Country
United States
Well, he certainly wasn't just thrown in prison for sarcastic shit talk. I found a post on Reddit from 2 years ago summarizing the case of United States v. Joshua Brandon.

I'll post it in the spoiler tag below for people who are curious about that case, but it's totally unrelated to the case of Ryan Hernandez that this thread is about.

The FBI's forensic examiner, who testified at Pillault's sentencing, performed an examination of Pillault's computer and found numerous documents pertaining to the creation of bombs and other explosive devices. Pillault's computer also had folders entitled “columbine” and “serialkiller,” which contained pictures relating to the Columbine shooting and other high-profile serial killers. The forensic examiner also found evidence that Pillault had searched on YouTube.com for “Super Columbine Massacre RPG,” a game that recreated the Columbine Massacre. In addition, Pillault had searched on YouTube and Google for instructions on how to make a sawed-off shotgun and information about Molotov cocktails.

Part 1

The first witness was Dr. Heather Ross, a forensic psychologist who was ordered by the district court to complete a psychiatric examination of Pillault and to report on mental illness, treatment options, and risk assessment. Dr. Ross testified that Pillault started using drugs and alcohol at the age of fourteen and that prior to his arrest he smoked marijuana and drank vodka every day. Dr. Ross discussed Pillault's mental history and explained that Pillault had previously attempted suicide and was hospitalized for aggression and depression. Dr. Ross concluded that “should Mr. Pillault continue to abuse substances his risk for future dangerousness ․ is moderate to high risk; but would be much lower if he was to be able to avoid using substances in the future.”

Part 2

The district court also heard testimony from two of Pillault's ex-girlfriends, whom we will refer to as GF1 and GF2. GF1, who started spending a significant amount of time with Pillault in the eleventh grade, testified about his aggressive tendencies and described him as a bully who frequently got into fights. She testified that Pillault was obsessed with Columbine and that he admired Dylan Klebold, one of the shooters involved in the Columbine massacre. According to GF1, Pillault planned to attack Oxford High School and drew specific plans in a notebook detailing how he would carry out the attack. GF1 claimed that Pillault warned her not to go to school on April 20, the anniversary of the Columbine shooting. GF1 also testified that on one occasion, Pillault asked her to take him to Home Depot, where he purchased a long copper pipe that he said he later used to make a pipe bomb.

GF2 testified that she had known Pillault since the fifth grade and that she was dating him during the months surrounding his arrest. GF2 agreed that Pillault was obsessed with Columbine and claimed that he frequently threatened to reenact Columbine at Oxford High School. She believed that Pillault's threats were serious and that he truly wanted to go through with the attack. According to GF2, Pillault had a few specific plans for how he would initiate his attack, one of which involved breaking through the glass walls of the school's cafeteria using pipe bombs and smoke bombs. GF2 claimed that Pillault planned to save up money to buy guns and that she and Pillault went to Wal–Mart to look at gun prices. GF2 testified that on one occasion, Pillault tried to make a bomb out of a glass Sprite bottle, which he filled with kerosene. GF2 testified that she had known Pillault since the fifth grade and that she was dating him during the months surrounding his arrest.

Part 3(Think this did the biggest damage)

Given that the guy had a history making these threats, mental/addiction issues which manifested themselves into aggression and depression bouts, and had done some research into making molotv cocktails and sawed-off shotgun made him a very possible risk which the courts acted strictly against.
So the courts made a case and somehow a successful conviction based entirely on circumstantial evidence. I'd probably serve a decade for the materials on my computer if that's all it takes to secure a conviction for a crime that didn't even happen yet, and may have never happened in the future.
I just want to point out that in the same paragraph you made a blanket judgement about Americans before denouncing people for making blanket judgements.

You see why that's hypocritical, right?

Anyway, those arguing for the death penalty in this case are ignorant to the fact that the death penalty would be unconstitutional in this case.

But on the other hand it doesn't make sense to argue that the man with dubious ethics that pled guilty to having child porn did not in fact have child porn. You'd think if they were planted that argument would at the very least come up in court.

I'm going to say it again for the people in the back.

He pled guilty to possession of child porn. He never even argued that it was planted. There's no reason to believe it was planted.

Is it so hard to believe that this man who repeatedly ignored warnings for doing illegal things online ALSO was in possession of child porn? Especially when there is no evidence (or even an argument stated in court) to the contrary?

Well, it doesn't matter if it's hard to believe (it's not) because he pled guilty to it. I don't understand why anyone would think it's a conspiracy when there's not a single indication that it was.
A guilty plea does not mean the person actually did it necessarily. Plenty of innocent people get coerced into pleading guilty thinking it will help them somehow. Plenty of guilty people plead not guilty even when the evidence is damning. A plea is not evidence in and if itself. I'm not saying either way what happened, but it is suspicious that it's only the Nintendo hackers who get caught with CP, maybe the Nintendo fanbase is just more enticing to those people? Now the police and government aren't above planting evidence and trumping up charges, just look at what they did to Ross Ulbricht. Not saying it's likely, just odd.
 

Ottoclav

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 27, 2020
Messages
132
Trophies
0
Age
43
XP
290
Country
United States
It's amazing seeing multiple people hoping this guy either gets raped in prison or killed (or both). I literally cannot think of another class of crime that gets this sort of lynch mob to gather. Poisoning the water supply for profit? Nope. Beating the elderly? Probably not. Mass-killing spree? Not even close. But just breathe the word pedophile (not even child molester, mind you!) and you get a swarm of people all gleefully cheering for the offender to be violently raped and/or killed. It reminds me of the bad old days, when people used to gather in the town square with the family to enjoy hangings and lynchings.

If he were to be raped and/or murder, then he would be the only person directly involved in this case to be physically harmed. Unless he produced those images/videos himself, which we can assume he didn't given that he wasn't charged with any such counts, then he didn't so much as touch a child. There are people who actually do abuse children to produce those images. If you want to see people who possess the images/videos raped and/or killed, then what exactly are we supposed to threaten the actual abusers with? At that point, why would this guy even bother to restrain himself? He'd be killed for it anyway, might as well go abuse an actual kid, right? That's the kind of incentive system that you'd be setting up.

That being said, I am highly surprised that he only got 3 years. Usually US prison sentences are extremely punitive, especially where child pornography charges are concerned. A while back I saw a case where a guy got 30 years for possessing a similar amount of child pornography, I believe it was 6 counts that gave 5 years each. Shortly thereafter I saw a case where a guy got 25 years for violently raping a 5 year old. Makes sense, right?
Some of these people are wondering why he only got three years, and some are wondering if the material was planted, and if it was, why he pled guilty? Umm, cuz 3 years could equal a plea bargain? I know television is a horrible way to base knowledge of court proceedings, but has the public forgotten all the fiction we watch on TV could actually be based on reality? I dunno. If he is a pedo, then so be it. If he isn't, then he is just getting the fruits of his multiple infractions. Either way, he brought it on himself. I don't think prison violence should be put on anybody, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crea

banjo2

gamer
Member
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
2,344
Trophies
1
Location
society
Website
youtube.com
XP
5,125
Country
United States
Last edited by banjo2,
  • Like
Reactions: Valery0p

diggeloid

Alex
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
469
Trophies
0
Age
34
Location
gbatemp.net
XP
2,397
Country
United States
Ngl the child porn stuff isn't surprising. Idk what it is about Nintendo that attracts so many pedos, creeps, and crazy people. Whenever you see a gathering of adult Nintendo fans, you can bet your ass there will be some pedos, furries, and other weirdos in attendance.
 

1B51004

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Messages
413
Trophies
1
XP
2,200
Country
United States
Ngl the child porn stuff isn't surprising. Idk what it is about Nintendo that attracts so many pedos, creeps, and crazy people. Whenever you see a gathering of adult Nintendo fans, you can bet your ass there will be some pedos, furries, and other weirdos in attendance.
Another point is that Nintendo is mainly targeted to kids, not FOR kids (big difference). Nintendo has games for all ages, and most ages can enjoy a game that E10+, but it's mainly going to be kids who are going to enjoy it the most. A Switch or a 3DS with a E10+ game is most likely going to be what a mother is going to buy for her 10- year old child for Christmas (unless she misreads/completely ignores the ESRB rating). If there's a bunch of kids who are attracted to a company who make/ sells games targeted to kids, you're most likely going to have a few nutjobs who are clearly messed up.
 
Last edited by 1B51004,

hippy dave

BBMB
Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,870
Trophies
2
XP
29,146
Country
United Kingdom
Having known most stuff about this case before, the part of this sentencing news that's got me wondering is whether the "cognitive challenges" thing is legit or just something the expensive lawyer wrangled to make things easier on him.
 

Ericzander

GBAtemp's residential attorney
Editorial Team
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
2,228
Trophies
3
Location
Grand Line
XP
7,716
Country
Somalia
  • Like
Reactions: diggeloid

Viri

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,226
Trophies
2
XP
6,817
Country
United States
Imagine only getting 3 years for having child porn, hacking a major company multiple times, and leaking personal info from said company. He must have had a great lawyer, lol.
 
Last edited by Viri,
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
2,577
Trophies
2
XP
3,799
Country
United States
Imagine only getting 3 years for having child porn, hacking a major company multiple times, and leaking personal info from said company. He must have had a great lawyer, lol.
He was also a minor when a lot of the offenses took place. I remember reading about it the last time he was in the news.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: