If it was required being a home owner to vote, how is that 'anti-female'? Does anything you say make sense?
Last edited by r0achtheunsavory,
-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States
- Thread starter yusuo
- Start date
- Views 433,671
- Replies 7,444
- Likes 45
- Status
If it was required being a home owner to vote, how is that 'anti-female'? Does anything you say make sense?
Do you see the idiocy you're in support of yet? These people want to take rights away from you.
You are a narcissist, aren't you? You can't even recognize when someone's making satire out of you.
You are just like cage lady. Everyone got annoyed with that bitch both liberals and conservatives. She like a robot on auto pilot repeating conservative phrases without addressing or paying attention what the others are saying like what a normal human does.
Caricatures are a form of satirical comedy. But I don't have a canvas, so text works.
D
Deleted User
Guest
Also pretty sure your mixing liberals and commies. I would be more... careful about your word choice. You don't know the consequences it could bring.
Oh and that racism thing... we'll get to that
Huh... So... communes don't exist? Roommates don't exist?
If we take communism at what it really means. A classless, moneyless state, where people provide what they can and take what they need as a collective. Since you know, people generally want to help out other people. If that was the intended measure (which it wasn't) it's failing pretty badly
Now, to that statement I held
Did you forget black people couldn't own land at the time? And that land has money? I ask you, who's better off. One that has land? That with proper care the value increases overtime. Or a person without land. Those from previous generations, that owed land back then, likely have decent to at least a okay place. While black people, they started without owning land. I wonder how that effects things?
Last edited by ,
That's what he's saying without saying it. He's a nationalist. He knows if he outright says "black people shouldn't own land" he'll get booted. He's posted anti-Semitic rhetoric, too, along with misogyny.
Last edited by Joom,
As for the "taxation is theft" claim. Since this thread has a lot of intellectual lightweights who are not going to be able to argue the realistic pros and cons of this issue. I guess I will have to tackle it.
The earth for all intents and purposes is a closed ecosystem caged deathmatch. War is the natural state of affairs and not peace in natural selection, of which humans are a part of. It's a complicated affair, but some would argue that even though people claim their rights are afforded to them by "God", your real immediate rights are afforded to you by protection from the tribe, of which you have to provide for the common defense - hence taxes.
Since I touched upon the whole "tribe" thing. That's another one the libtards don't understand. The common evolution of human group is individual > family > village/tribe > city state all based upon a common ethnic group. Then potentially more city states forming a nation. In the natural world, ethnonationalism is the norm and possibly the only functional human grouping there is, while libtards claim it's an unnatural abomination (hint: libtards are always wrong).
The earth for all intents and purposes is a closed ecosystem caged deathmatch. War is the natural state of affairs and not peace in natural selection, of which humans are a part of. It's a complicated affair, but some would argue that even though people claim their rights are afforded to them by "God", your real immediate rights are afforded to you by protection from the tribe, of which you have to provide for the common defense - hence taxes.
Since I touched upon the whole "tribe" thing. That's another one the libtards don't understand. The common evolution of human group is individual > family > village/tribe > city state all based upon a common ethnic group. Then potentially more city states forming a nation. In the natural world, ethnonationalism is the norm and possibly the only functional human grouping there is, while libtards claim it's an unnatural abomination (hint: libtards are always wrong).
D
Deleted User
Guest
So... essentially you just outed yourself as a nationalist and racist.
Congrats on playing yourself.
ethnonationalism=nationalism defined within ethnicity
aka race
slow claps
So... what about the left being racist again?
Last edited by ,
And here's the ethnostate rhetoric, straight out of the "Neo-Nazis For Dummies" handbook. I actually pity you, because as time goes by, you and this line of thinking will be replaced as you die miserable and afraid. You're on your way out, and so is this garbage that impedes the advancement of the human race. Next you're gonna be on here in support of inbreeding as a means to preserve your lineage's purity.
Last edited by Joom,
Nice try, leftist propaganda liar. What I typed is mainstream sociology 101. And you wonder why nobody on the earth likes leftists? When you type textbook sociology 101 and they're like WAH WAH EVERYTHING IS RACIST. No race was even mentioned in the example. The history of human evolution and city states are racist! Fucking hilarious.
Last edited by r0achtheunsavory,
I don't remember who said it, but Trump technically only has 304 electoral votes in 2016. Not 306.
False.
Anthony Johnson (b. c. 1600 – d. 1670) was a black Angolan known for achieving wealth in the early 17th-century Colony of Virginia. He was one of the first African American property owners and had his right to legally own a slave recognized by the Virginia courts. Held as an indentured servant in 1621, he earned his freedom after several years, and was granted land by the colony
In fact per capita slave ownership was more common place amongst blacks than it was whites.
D
Deleted User
Guest
"Ethnic nationalism, also known as ethnonationalism, is a form of nationalism wherein the nation and nationality are defined in terms of ethnicity, with emphasis on ethnocentric approach to various political issues related to national affirmation of a particular ethnic group."
And you're claiming humans did not evolve with this system? Should we award you with a PhD? Because nobody else on the planet claims this. Its seems you've risen above every researcher on earth who is ever existed by typing a word I used in google you don't even understand.
Oh, hey look. Those Japanese and Chinese in the year 2020 are practicing ethnonationalism. But that's perfectly fine! Because....I have no idea....I'm a leftist...only white people can be racist.
There were two faithless electors who didn't vote as required in the electoral college, however the supreme court later ruled they weren't allowed to do that so I don't know who is technically right. It was 304 for that night but I don't if the supreme courts decisions changed that to 306 retroactively.
D
Deleted User
Guest
Never needed to claim that. Nor have not.
This is your belief no? that it's the only functioning human group?
When I'll tell you now. No it's not. And oh by the way, you believing that, and believing that ethnonationalism is the only way for people to exist. Given your only by that statement. Makes you racist.
Argue with me this is not racist. Don't dodge, you bore me when you do.
Last edited by ,
Ethnonationalism IMO is inherently inappropriate "A little late" for the United States, but there is nothing inherently wrong with ethnonationalism and having a homogenous culture. And it is not racist to believe it functions in a healthier manner than multiculturalism.
Ethnonationalism works just fine in Japan.
Lol. Having weirdo, uneducated children on the internet who look like they're under 18 call you "racist" for discussing textbook sociology 101 is not much of a problem for me. You can cut to the chase and just admit the only reason you're typing jack shit at all is to try and pretend to be smarter than someone that you aren't, so resorted to some nebulous, moral bullshit argument nobody gives a damn about.
D
Deleted User
Guest
So your giving up yes?
I mean you still haven't refuted my statement.
Is it because your copium has dried up?
Oh for anyone who wants to know. Here's what I said. (including quotes I used in post)
I'll just keep repost this if you keep ignoring.
Last edited by ,
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A @ Aglae Pheryl:Is anyone familiar with former forum opg.life ? I missed the transition to the new forum over the week end (was scuba diving in the sticks with no internet connection). If anyone in touch with any members please pm me.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
AncientBoi:
And a part of my immediate family passed also. Sending my good suit to the cleaners for the funeral Saturday -
-
(
