PS5 to be backward compatible with over 4000 PS4 games but some "may exhibit errors"

PS5.JPG

Sony revealed in a post today that the PS5 will be backward compatible with "the overwhelming majority" of PS4 games; meaning over 4000 titles. Some of these will benefit from the PS5's Game Boost feature which could improve the original game with higher or smoother frame rate. The company also confirmed the compatibility of the PlayStation VR headset and PS VR games which will require, in addition to the headset, a PS camera (sold separately from PS5 console) and a PS camera adaptor (no purchase required).

However, the console maker also mentioned limitations regarding this backward compatibility. For one, the post mentions that some functionalities available on the PS4 might not be available on the PS5. Additionally, Sony writes that some PS4 games "may exhibit errors or unexpected behavior when played on PS5 consoles". The company did not clarify which games will be affected by those issues nor what these issues are specifically.

Moreover, Sony did list 10 games which will only be playable on the PS4 and not on its next-gen console. These games will feature a ‘Playable on: PS4 only’ tag on the PlayStation Store. You can find a list of those PS4-only games below:
  • DWVR
  • Afro Samurai 2 Revenge of Kuma Volume One
  • TT Isle of Man - Ride on the Edge 2
  • Just Deal With It!
  • Shadow Complex Remastered
  • Robinson: The Journey
  • We Sing
  • Hitman Go: Definitive Edition
  • Shadwen
  • Joe's Diner
You can find more details regarding transferring digital games from a PS4 console to a PS5 console and installing PS4 games on the upcoming console in the official post linked in the source below.

:arrow: SOURCE
 

jt_1258

Ella
Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
3,053
Trophies
2
Age
24
XP
4,868
Country
United States
so they got just to within barely a hair away from crossing the finish line with full compat and said..."nah, I give up"
you gotta be kidding me...I don't care if it's only a couple lost it's the fact that it's so few and that they aren't wrapping up the last few to get rid of the asterisk next to ps4 backwards compatibility that feels like bullshit to me. if it where accessory issues I could sort of understand but this just feels a little lazy. go big or go home
 

D34DL1N3R

Nephilim
Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
3,670
Trophies
1
XP
3,220
Country
United States
It's as if some of you for some odd reason, think that EVERY single Xbox, 360, XB1 title is going to be backwards compatible with the Series X. BC wasn't 100% with 360 or XB1 either. So I'm not quite sure what some people are crying over. That list of games is nothing anyway. It's like complaining that Soda Drinker Pro and Professional Farmer 2017 won't play on the Series X.
 

Jayro

MediCat USB Dev
Developer
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
12,962
Trophies
4
Location
WA State
Website
ko-fi.com
XP
16,954
Country
United States
Sounds like Sony is too lazy to release a few compatibility patches, like the 360 and Xbone did. They could easily reboot the PS5 into a PS4_FIRM and run the PS4 in a sort of "PS4 Mode" like the 3DS does with GBA injects and DS games.
 

Ryab

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2017
Messages
3,224
Trophies
1
XP
4,447
Country
United States

Sony revealed in a post today that the PS5 will be backward compatible with "the overwhelming majority" of PS4 games; meaning over 4000 titles. Some of these will benefit from the PS5's Game Boost feature which could improve the original game with higher or smoother frame rate. The company also confirmed the compatibility of the PlayStation VR headset and PS VR games which will require, in addition to the headset, a PS camera (sold separately from PS5 console) and a PS camera adaptor (no purchase required).

However, the console maker also mentioned limitations regarding this backward compatibility. For one, the post mentions that some functionalities available on the PS4 might not be available on the PS5. Additionally, Sony writes that some PS4 games "may exhibit errors or unexpected behavior when played on PS5 consoles". The company did not clarify which games will be affected by those issues nor what these issues are specifically.

Moreover, Sony did list 10 games which will only be playable on the PS4 and not on its next-gen console. These games will feature a ‘Playable on: PS4 only’ tag on the PlayStation Store. You can find a list of those PS4-only games below:
  • DWVR
  • Afro Samurai 2 Revenge of Kuma Volume One
  • TT Isle of Man - Ride on the Edge 2
  • Just Deal With It!
  • Shadow Complex Remastered
  • Robinson: The Journey
  • We Sing
  • Hitman Go: Definitive Edition
  • Shadwen
  • Joe's Diner
You can find more details regarding transferring digital games from a PS4 console to a PS5 console and installing PS4 games on the upcoming console in the official post linked in the source below.

:arrow: SOURCE
Theres a reason I tend to never buy a console towards the beginning of the generation
 
  • Like
Reactions: Julie_Pilgrim

scroeffie1984

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2019
Messages
501
Trophies
0
Age
40
XP
1,778
Country
Netherlands
70 dollars for a game is not expensive ,games back in the day cost 200 gulden dutch money ! or sometimes even more
backwards compatible via disc ?
 

Spider_Man

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
3,924
Trophies
0
Age
38
XP
5,162
Country
United States
what fucking errors? my decision to get a ps5 continues to drift further and further away. first they are releasing all their so called exclusives on pc and continue to censorship the shit out of everything and now BC might not even work properly! :glare:
Ohh stfu you moaning little girl.

Like pc games, you can get issues as the hardware used was not what it was built for.

And whqt sony exclusives have sony released on pc.

I couldnt give a toss if the ps5 didnt play ps4 games, its not like i dont have 3 ps4 consoles to play games on.
 

pedro702

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Messages
12,719
Trophies
2
Age
33
XP
8,692
Country
Portugal
It's probably not so much a matter of "giving the PS5 trouble" as it is the game being coded in such a way that it's incompatible with the way they've setup backwards compatibility.

Presumably they're not just running an emulator (that would be silly), I expect it's similar to the approach MS does with their 360 BC on the Xboner, the game is recompiled to run on the PS5 natively. There's probably some kind of module or library or something that's not supported on the PS5, so a few games just might not work properly when it's being recompiled.
or it could simply be some games that take advantage of hardware bugs to execute code, there are alot of games that did this back then and those bugs arent present on newer hardware.
 

ChibiMofo

Elon Musk is my dog
Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Messages
699
Trophies
0
XP
2,844
Country
Canada
At some point in 2006, or maybe it was 2007, it became clear that in spite of the weird name and the last-gen power, the Wii was going to win that generation and that Sony had failed to live up to its E3 hype on the PS3.

This is that moment for this generation when it should become clear that the Xbox is going to win this generation and that it won't be particularly close. Sony is still sending out half-truths just ahead of the launch while MSFT continues to be completely transparent. Xbox Live is a much better deal than $70 PS5 (temporary) exclusives. And Sony isn't even capable of competing with it.
 

pedro702

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Messages
12,719
Trophies
2
Age
33
XP
8,692
Country
Portugal
i dont get why americans are beinging in the 70$ a game thing into this, in europe every ps4/xbox1 game was 70 euros full price already and i didnt see anyone climbing trees lol even with 70dollars we still pay more for each game from even the ps3/xbox360 ownward(ps3/xbox360 games were 65 euros if i recall)

seriously and yet they complain, i dont fell sorry at all for you guys haveing to now still pay less than we do at all.

At some point in 2006, or maybe it was 2007, it became clear that in spite of the weird name and the last-gen power, the Wii was going to win that generation and that Sony had failed to live up to its E3 hype on the PS3.

This is that moment for this generation when it should become clear that the Xbox is going to win this generation and that it won't be particularly close. Sony is still sending out half-truths just ahead of the launch while MSFT continues to be completely transparent. Xbox Live is a much better deal than $70 PS5 (temporary) exclusives. And Sony isn't even capable of competing with it.
tbh i dont beleive this, if there is a switch 2 and a good marketing for it, nintendo will win hands down imo.

also xbox has basicaly no market in asian countrys and even on europe playstation wins by a landslide over xbox sales, so yeah xbox might win usa sales but will loose on everywhere else easily, most people who buy consoles dont read the news wenbsites at all, they just go for their favorite brand.
 

AlexMCS

Human
Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
627
Trophies
0
Age
38
Location
Fortaleza
XP
2,857
Country
Brazil
At some point in 2006, or maybe it was 2007, it became clear that in spite of the weird name and the last-gen power, the Wii was going to win that generation and that Sony had failed to live up to its E3 hype on the PS3.

This is that moment for this generation when it should become clear that the Xbox is going to win this generation and that it won't be particularly close. Sony is still sending out half-truths just ahead of the launch while MSFT continues to be completely transparent. Xbox Live is a much better deal than $70 PS5 (temporary) exclusives. And Sony isn't even capable of competing with it.

Considering the box has 0 exclusives, timed or not, I'd say Sony will still win if they play their cards right.
Like I say all the freaking time, what makes people buy consoles are the exclusive games in the first place.
If there is no exclusivity, the hardware with the better cost/benefit ratio (almost always the PC) wins the race.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    the vram is one advantage when it comes to AI but ends up being slower even with that and really AI is the only use case that needs more than 12gb vram right now
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Interesting lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think I watched a video where two games at 4K where eating just over 16GB of RAM and it's the one case where the 7900XT and XTX pulled ahead (minus RTX of course)
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    So my opinion is that they could age a bit better in the future, and maybe AMD will continue improving them via drivers like they tend to do. No guarantee there but they have done it in the past. Just a feeling I have.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    cyberpunk at 4k without DLSS/fidelityfx *might* exceed 12gb
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that game barely runs at native 4k
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think it was some newer games and probably poorly optimized PS4 or PS5 ports
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    they definitely will age better but i feel dlss might outweigh that since it looks about as good as native resolution and much less demanding
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    When I played Cyberpunk on my old 2080 Ti it sucked lol
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    AMD could introduce something comparable to DLSS but nvidia's got a lot more experience with that
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    least amd 7xxx has tensor cores which the previous generations didn't so there is the potential for AI upscaling
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They have FSR or whatever it's called and yeah it's still not great
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    so AMD seem to finally be starting to take AI seriously
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Oh yeah those new 8000 CPUs have AI cores built in that's interesting
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Maybe they plan on offloading to the CPU?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Would be kinda cool to have the CPU and GPU working in random more
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Tandem even
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    even the nvidia shield tv has AI video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    LLMs can be run on cpu anyway but it's quite slow
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Have you ever been beaten by a wet spaghetti noodle by your girlfriend because she has a twin sister, and you got confused and fucked her dad?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I had a girlfriend who had a twin sister and they would mess with me constantly.... Until one chipped a tooth then finally I could tell them apart.... Lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They would have the same hair style the same clothes everything... Really messed with my head lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to maybe close the gap a bit with Nvidia. Plus it would kinda put Nvidia at a future disadvantage since Nvidia can't make X86/64 CPUs? Intel and AMD licensing issues... I wonder how much that has held back innovation.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to...