We can debate relative merits of actions of different people if you like, however you initially said the current el presidente was the first one in quite some time not to lob some bombs on the middle east.
Seen as Yemen (right next door to Saudi Arabia and Oman on the same peninsula so definitely middle east) had a whole bunch of bombs dropped during that timeframe that is demonstrably untrue. None of this was about the justification for such acts (some might well have been justified, some not) or relative volumes compared to previous administrations (there is more than just Yemen) but that is a different discussion.
You then said what if the person who did the whole 11th of September 2001 attacks attempted to justify their actions what would I think. A bizarre tangent really given the previous discussion but OK. The person ultimately held as financing, motivating and whatnot such things is known and their part in such acts is accepted by just about everybody. He did then release various documents attempting to justify the attacks, and general hostilities before and after, which is what I linked.
How is it a bizarre tangent when
you mentioned justification initially. I've been pretty clear, I think you may be confused because what you're saying is reading like a college assignment. Lots of citations out of left field and phrases such as "motivating and whatnot such things is known and their part in such acts is accepted by just about everybody".
You seem like an intelligent person but why feign confusion? Also, intelligent people do not resort to technicalities to prove their point. Its feeble. If not for the Obama administration supporting the coalition against Yemen, Trump, as his successor would not have had to follow through. Yet when Trump did, the Obama camp suddenly decided the matter was ill-advised.
Its the same as the whole "children in cage" debacle. Obama set up those facilities in the first place.
Need I remind you of the horrific human rights breaches in guantanamo the Obama administration is responsible for?
I am not a trump supporter and neither an obama fan - they're equally as bad. I just said Trump, in my personal opinion is the lesser of two evils. Now I know you're probably baffled, or befuddled, or perplexed or nonplussed (not confused because that's too simple a word, dear me) by what I just said but remember, we don't all need to be at the altar of saint barack to be good.
He bombed Syria and ordered a clear act of war against Iran. Not saying Clinton would have been better.
Read above.
So trump holding funding from Ukraine, funding that was approved by both senate and house. For political favors is okay?
Asking Russia to find Hilary's emails okay? I don't care what stance your on about Hilary ( I don't like her) but another country having influence on our elections, due to a man asking for it, is more than bad enough. Oh wait, your going to claim fake news aren't you. Since it doesn't fit your political views. My point being, Trump has been worse with his meddling, and rather than being another country, the united states is the target.
I have no political views on this, I am not American. Just stating my opinion on the matter, which where I come from is perfectly allowed. As for the whole "political favours" is concerned, please, not like he got a box of chocolates in return. Same for the russia meddling thing. I deal with facts not wives tales for the bored and mediocre.