Status
Not open for further replies.

Fire Emblem: Three Houses will feature same-sex romance options for certain characters

D1Hv61iU8AEa61W.jpg

The latest Fire Emblem game is almost here, as fans only need to wait more two weeks until the game's launch, on July 26th. Spoilers and information are beginning to spread, as people get their hands on review copies or find retailers that break street date. Series fans will know that Supports are a major part of previous Fire Emblem games, with more modern entries fully allowing you to play matchmaker with every member of your army. This new Fire Emblem title will have that same feature, though with a rather significant addition; Nintendo has confirmed that Fire Emblem: Three Houses will allow your player character to romance certain other party members, particularly of the same sex. This isn't the first time that the series has allowed for same-sex romance options--Fire Emblem: Fates gave players two party members that you could romance, regardless of your player character's gender. Not every unit will be compatible, but an initial list of some of those specific characters can be found in the source link, below.

Considering the reception and popularity of a well-known Fire Emblem: Fates romhack, hosted on this very site, this choice could be a very welcome and long-awaited one.

:arrow: Source
 

chaoskagami

G̷̘̫̍̈́̊̓̈l̴̙͔̞͠i̵̳͊ţ̸̙͇͒̓c̵̬̪̯̥̳͒͌̚h̵̹̭͛̒̊̽̚
Developer
Joined
Mar 26, 2016
Messages
1,365
Trophies
1
Location
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Website
github.com
XP
2,287
Country
United States
I like to pair my characters in combat based on the total damage they can do together or to help move slower units faster across the field. I know this builds up the relationship levels. I just want to know if their is an easy solution so they don’t become romantic with each other in the process. I don’t see how that’s attacking Fire emblem’s choice to allow the behavior of those people in the game.

You contradicted the first half of your argument with the second half. If you're truly pairing units up because it improves damage, why would you not take another support rank to get the boost from it? I mean, if you want the S-rank with specific characters, then it's simple; grind those characters first. Not second. Or pull them off when they get to A and then grind the S-rank out with the desired character so that getting S-rank is disabled for that pairing.
 
Last edited by chaoskagami,

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
You contradicted the first half of your argument with the second half. If you're truly pairing units up because it improves damage, why would you not take another support rank to get the boost from it? I mean, if you want the S-rank with specific characters, then it's simple; grind those characters first. Not second. Or pull them off when they get to A and then grind the S-rank out with the desired character so that getting S-rank is disabled for that pairing.

I have no idea what you are taking about. Rank this rank that. What?
 

Scarlet

Onion Soup
Editorial Team
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Messages
5,144
Trophies
2
Location
Middleish North-Right
Website
scarlet.works
XP
14,767
Country
United Kingdom
I have no idea what you are taking about. Rank this rank that. What?
As units' support ranking grows, they get extra bonuses for working together basically. So if you want them to be as good as possible together, their 'relationship level' or support rank or whatever they call it in this game, will need to be worked on.

That being said, if you're dire for an strictly no rainbow go zone, just check the list of characters that disagree with your moral compass and maybe don't pair them together? There's like six of them, it can't be that hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chaoskagami

chaoskagami

G̷̘̫̍̈́̊̓̈l̴̙͔̞͠i̵̳͊ţ̸̙͇͒̓c̵̬̪̯̥̳͒͌̚h̵̹̭͛̒̊̽̚
Developer
Joined
Mar 26, 2016
Messages
1,365
Trophies
1
Location
↑↑↓↓←→←→BA
Website
github.com
XP
2,287
Country
United States
I have no idea what you are taking about. Rank this rank that. What?

Play previous fire emblem games, then? I think it's pretty clear. The only reason you wouldn't know what I'm talking about if you're a gameplay min-maxer is if you haven't played any fire emblem before at all. Or, you're just guising your dislike for the content by using gameplay as an excuse.
 
Last edited by chaoskagami,

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
As units' support ranking grows, they get extra bonuses for working together basically. So if you want them to be as good as possible together, their 'relationship level' or support rank or whatever they call it in this game, will need to be worked on.

That being said, if you're dire for an strictly no rainbow
Play previous fire emblem games, then? I think it's pretty clear. The only reason you wouldn't know what I'm talking about if you're a gameplay min-maxer is if you haven't played any fire emblem before at all.

I have played fire emblem awakening to the end of the main story twice. Once with each main npc. Played a little of fates but the story wasn’t compiling enough to ever finish the story. So I barely know how the team-up and relationship systems tie into each other. I don’t full dive into games anymore. I just don’t find games as fun as they used to be.
 

GbaNober

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
153
Trophies
0
XP
782
Country
at least it's "OPTIONAL" not forced because FE understand that they need to balance the minority and majority type of their fan/customer base.
 

DarkKaine

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
372
Trophies
0
Age
35
XP
1,276
Country
Netherlands
I could never get into chess. Grid shit may have worked in the seventh century because of manufacturing limitations, but nowadays I consider it lazy and unacceptable.

(Do you see the problem here?)
Sure do. I tend to like every other element about this game mind you, it's just the combat mechanics that feel dated and won't change because it's a staple of the franchise. And yes I hate chess too :P
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
It says a lot on how they consider the expectations their target demographic.
Good to be a niche, I don't have to bend (hum) to dated marketing tropes.

And I love chess, duality is what really makes strategy fun.

Real time strategy are more sandboxes when played against CPU and tacticals are grinding fest, nothing more.
E*chi stuff in FE just gave more appeal to it.
 

julianuf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
128
Trophies
0
Age
34
XP
1,811
Country
United States
I don't understand all of the "it's not forced" and "it's optional" stuff so many people keep saying.

For picking out the romance for a character that's supposed to be a representation of the player... Yeah, sure.

But does that mean, if there was a character in the game that was gay, and could only date guys, or if it were a different type of game and one of the male characters dated another male character throughout the game's story, that WOULD NOT be acceptable? (Or is the "key" word here marriage...?)

If so... Some of y'all need to take a good hard look in the mirror. ;(
 
  • Like
Reactions: smile72

livipup

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
53
Trophies
0
Age
26
Location
Toronto
XP
144
Country
Canada
What’s next, Mario and Luigi?
I would point out that this is incest, but Fates did let you marry and fuck your cousin so I can't even argue they wouldn't do that.

So according to Ninty you still can't just be gay, you GOTTA BE BI
It is a roleplaying game so in reality you can be whatever you want. Maybe you're the only gay at the school and all the people you can date are bi, but I really doubt the game explicitly calls Byleths bisexual. They probably don't call anyone bi.

As long as it's not explicitly forced, there's no real issue. I know it sounds awful, but yeah..
Plenty of games do explicitly force the player to be straight so I don't think that would be a problem either. Even Assassins Creed Odyssey which allows for gay romance options forces the player into a heterosexual relationship, so if they can do stuff like that I see no reason a game can't force players to choose a same-sex partner. No reason Nintendo can't release a game where the player is explicitly gay.

What about the gameplay though?
There are plenty of threads about that which you can read if this doesn't interest you. But of course this is a part of the gameplay. It's a feature in the game. You play the game. The game you play has this feature as part of your play. Gameplay.
 
Last edited by livipup,

|<roni&g

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
452
Trophies
1
Location
UK
XP
2,164
Country
United States
I agree, it is disgusting news that people feel the need to attack a game for having lgbt people in it. Theyre such snowflakes that they cant even handle FACTS and EVIDENCE like the existence of gay people. SAD!

It’s sad that people forget how they made it onto this planet. This generation think they know better than all that came before them with their rainbow BS and now they’re pushing it on kids to confuse them, disgraceful, selfish fucks
 

smile72

NewsBot
Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
1,910
Trophies
0
Age
30
Location
???
XP
993
Country
It’s sad that people forget how they made it onto this planet. This generation think they know better than all that came before them with their rainbow BS and now they’re pushing it on kids to confuse them, disgraceful, selfish fucks
Well first off...I am so glad I can romance the right gender that I like (sadly none of the guys are that hot but oh well better than nothing).
Second...someone is oddly triggered. Why you hating on LGBT people? People have been gay for forever. And nothing personal I knew I liked guys when I was 5...so yeah. A LOT of kids already have feelings like this. Nothing is being pushed because nothing can be pushed. It;s just an option.
Third, you sound like one of those old racists. The type who wouldn't let their kids see Guess Who's Coming to Dinner because it forces miscegenation on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Girafarig
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    fuck ubisoft, and fuck activision
    +1
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    Nintendo needs to release a new console, switch is getting such shitty little games lately lol it's pathetic
  • Purple_Heart @ Purple_Heart:
    Lmao a new flashcart... The Unlock Switch... I knew it's not fake xD
    +1
  • NinStar @ NinStar:
    A new consoles won't solve that problem
  • NinStar @ NinStar:
    It will actually make it worse
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    well actually
    a new console won't do anything right now, because the games are still in development, that's why there are few games being released
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    it won't make the games finish any faster
  • Veho @ Veho:
    2/3rds of launch titles for the Switch 2 will just be lazy ports of Switch games anyway.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    probably
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    maybe mario kart 9 will be a launch title
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i really want a new mario kart
  • Veho @ Veho:
    What, you mean the endless stream of DLCs doesn't count?
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Why develop a new game when you can just sell season passes forever?
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I'm still on MKDS so I'm not bothered :tpi:
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i like the dlc tbh, i'd like a new game more
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    but the current version is still selling fine at full price
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Hello
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    sup
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @realtimesave, You seen the Unlock Switch flashcart yet?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I'll see the 19.0 update that blocks use ability to it
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Lol newegg+
    Screenshot-20240423-053504-Gmail.jpg
  • S @ salazarcosplay:
    does update 19 really block it
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Update 19 never came out yet. Just the 18.1.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: Update 19 never came out yet. Just the 18.1.