Hardware 2.5” drives. Sshd or ssd?

Sshd or ssd. Does it matter?

  • Sshd is fine

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Ssd ftw!

    Votes: 8 88.9%
  • It doesn’t matter/can’t tell the difference.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9

slaphappygamer

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
4,123
Trophies
2
Age
46
Location
California
XP
7,634
Country
United States
Currently, I’m in the market for a new 2.5” drive for my laptop. Don’t want to spend more than $100. For that price I can get a 2tb sshd or a 1tb ssd.
Currently, in my laptop, I have a 240gb ssd and a 1tb hdd (inplace of the optical drive). I love the ssd, but I need more capacity. I don’t do any crazy video editing. If it matters, laptop is a dell Inspiron n5010. Anyone have an sshd? How is it?
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
I am somewhat surprised hybrid drives are still being made/being made again.
For my money though they are the worst of both worlds -- just as fragile as normally spinning rust, about as slow outside of certain lab tests and specific loads (none of which correspond to day to day uses), as expensive as SSD, and while not quite as low capacity as SSD still not the same as spinning rust. Many of them have also been less than stellar on a design front (had a small batch I put out at one point, more than a few I returned under warranty) but I am not up to date on models there, though in general I would expect them to age like a SSD (which is to say don't expect to still see it working in 10 years).
 

spectral

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
626
Trophies
1
Age
42
XP
2,484
Country
I am somewhat surprised hybrid drives are still being made/being made again.
For my money though they are the worst of both worlds -- just as fragile as normally spinning rust, about as slow outside of certain lab tests and specific loads (none of which correspond to day to day uses), as expensive as SSD, and while not quite as low capacity as SSD still not the same as spinning rust. Many of them have also been less than stellar on a design front (had a small batch I put out at one point, more than a few I returned under warranty) but I am not up to date on models there, though in general I would expect them to age like a SSD (which is to say don't expect to still see it working in 10 years).

They're not nearly as expensive as the same capacity SSD. They're very slightly more than a normal HDD.
 

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,662
Trophies
2
XP
6,047
Country
First I would check if you actually need a larger SSD for video editing, particularly for speed and temp space.

Second, are you able to use the HDD instead of the SSD for certain things/the video project? For example, I have a 128GB SSD and 1TB HDD in my laptop, with allot of software, documents, etc. stored on the HDD and I've not really noticed any slowdown.

One option to consider may be saving a bit and getting a 512GB SSD and 2TB HDD.

edit:

From what I've heard SSHDs are only really good for regularly accessed data, so it could be a waste.
 
Last edited by tech3475,
  • Like
Reactions: slaphappygamer

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,662
Trophies
2
XP
6,047
Country
A SSD is definitely my choice for a laptop. HDDs and hybrid drives don’t cope well with movement and the portability of laptops means they’re prone to being moved all the time.

From my experience that’s never been too much of an issue, at least for ‘normal’ movement, in fact most HDD failures I’ve encountered were from static devices.
 

Originality

Chibi-neko
Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,716
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
London, UK
Website
metalix.deviantart.com
XP
1,904
Country
From my experience that’s never been too much of an issue, at least for ‘normal’ movement, in fact most HDD failures I’ve encountered were from static devices.
My experience is slightly different. 1 failed Seagate from a desktop after 6 years of use, a dozen failed laptop HDDs (mostly Maxtor or Hitachi) from 12 months to 3 years of use, and more dead external drives than I can count, usually within 6-12 months of use.
 

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,662
Trophies
2
XP
6,047
Country
My experience is slightly different. 1 failed Seagate from a desktop after 6 years of use, a dozen failed laptop HDDs (mostly Maxtor or Hitachi) from 12 months to 3 years of use, and more dead external drives than I can count, usually within 6-12 months of use.

So basically, YMMV.

BTW, with externals, I often find it's actually the SATA/IDE to USB converter that fails before the actual drive. One reason why I like to avoid externals with combined USB/SATA controllers. Saved a few good drives this way.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Crowbar?