Riot Games employees held a walkout in protest of company policies and reportedly sexist management

o0LxabJ.png

Not too long ago, a handful of workers at League of Legends studio Riot Games were attempting to bring the company to court on claims of gender discrimination. Shortly after that, Riot claimed that they would look into making their workplace a better place for its female workers, though in the months since the five separate lawsuits, things appear to not have changed. Over 150 employees walked out in protest, giving speeches about their grievances with Riot's upper management. Specifically, they were striking against forced arbitration, which is a policy that essentially means workers are unable to bring their cases to a jury, and it can even result in their right to sue being waived when it comes to harassment or discrimination issues. Following the protest, Riot Games claims it will allow for new hires to opt out of forced arbitration, though current and former employees will not have that option, as the studio is still concerned with continuing litigation from last year. When asked for their opinion on the walkout, Riot's PR team claimed they respected any worker who took part in the protest, and that there would be no retaliation against those who were speaking at the event. According to the employees, they will continue holding protests in the future, until Riot Games changes their ways to be more accommodating to their workforce.

:arrow: Source
 

Jackson Ferrell

I don't like SJWs
Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
328
Trophies
0
XP
828
Country
Australia
You can never really tell if those are true or false claims just from a brief overview and not thorough evidence. But what annoys me is that you have people (the accusers and the people who assume based off an article with little or no actual evidence) start making a massive fuss over it and then you have people running around telling everyone that company's toxic. So basically you can ruin a company's reputation based off a lie someone started because they weren't paid what they think they deserve and not what they actually deserve. I'm not saying company's don't have harassment and discrimination in the workplace but both of these instances happen.
 
D

Deleted_413010

Guest
I don't understand why everyone is so against arbitration. If you also sign a contract saying you are willing to arbitrate any suits, I think that should hold.

Do you even hear the bullshit coming out of your mouth? Lookie here. Forced arbitration shouldn't even be legal. Why? Because its god damn bullshit. Imagine you got discriminated for being a black person. You would get mad wouldn't you? Well you can't do shit because your contract states arbitration. Is that what you want forced upon the world? Your just like the worst companies in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CallmeBerto

Haloman800

a real gril
Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,874
Trophies
1
XP
1,749
Country
United States
They've done studies which show people like to work with those of the same gender, age, race, etc.

If all the employees were the same gender, this wouldn't be happening. Yet it's illegal to hire the same gender. Hmm

The takeaway is, the government really doesn't care about preventing sexual harassment, etc. They simply want to forcibly amalgamate everyone together.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
Do you even hear the bullshit coming out of your mouth? Lookie here. Forced arbitration shouldn't even be legal. Why? Because its god damn bullshit. Imagine you got discriminated for being a black person. You would get mad wouldn't you? Well you can't do shit because your contract states arbitration. Is that what you want forced upon the world? Your just like the worst companies in the world.

You said nothing of particular substance there on why the quoted poster should not do it/care for it/like it.

For some arbitration is a slightly more formal way of "settle it out of court" without the time, expense and hassle of going through the motions of a court case. Not entirely unlike a small claims court where things are a bit more streamlined.

I would agree the variation in arbiter quality and some notable cases of things being weighted in favour of one or the other, especially where people don't understand what it is they are doing, but that seems more like something the law should resolve if it is being a problem. For a tech field with an education barrier to so much as get in the door... nah.

There is nothing in arbitration that states you can't get heard for discrimination on the basis of race.


Re the get a new job discussions.
Is the game industry a magical part of the tech field wherein one actually moves up in a company? Everywhere else this last 20 or so years I have been paying attention has been "to move up you move out" (whether to another or founding your own is a different matter), or maybe into manglement. Promotion from within, much less as a technical role, vanished decades ago in most things I see, and looking at credits in games and history of people that have just made games I like it seems to be the case in games too but I could be wrong there -- games industry pay and conditions are generally shockingly poor and known to be so which means any interactions I have are more as a consultant no different than any of my other clients.
All the same problems that game devs solve and work on are worked on elsewhere (not like said folks end up hyper specialised or anything). While some might balk at taking on game coders (and given the quality of code I have seen over the years then not entirely without reason) there are still those that will give you a shot.
For a one horse town where it is factory or shop selling things to people in the factory then more gets to be said. All the game companies I see are based in places with gigantic tech sectors, ones game devs whose work I enjoy seem to frequently find themselves playing in when I follow up what people are doing there.
 
D

Deleted_413010

Guest
Yet it's illegal to hire the same gender

I don't believe so. If this was true then companies would be very mad. I mean...sure it prevents them from not hiring females or males at all but you can still hire multiple of the same gender.
 

Haloman800

a real gril
Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,874
Trophies
1
XP
1,749
Country
United States
....I think you're really misinterpreting the point article tries to prove =)
The article references the same study I did, it's simply bemoaning the findings. :^)

I don't believe so. If this was true then companies would be very mad. I mean...sure it prevents them from not hiring females or males at all but you can still hire multiple of the same gender.
It's illegal to discriminate _on the basis of_ gender (or race, religion, etc). And if it turns out that, say, Asian and white men ended up being the best for every position in the job, that alone can set you up to be sued because it seems like you're discriminating.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjK2lPBzGzo