• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Mueller personally told AG that he had mischaracterized the investigation's findings

  • Thread starter Xzi
  • Start date
  • Views 10,775
  • Replies 133
  • Likes 1

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,533
Country
United States
WaPo said:
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III expressed his concerns in a letter to William P. Barr after the attorney general publicized Mueller’s principal conclusions. The letter was followed by a phone call during which Mueller pressed Barr to release executive summaries of his report.

Days after Barr’s announcement , Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Mueller’s work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

The letter made a key request: that Barr release the 448-page report’s introductions and executive summaries, and made some initial suggested redactions for doing so, according to Justice Department officials.


Justice Department officials said Tuesday they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller’s letter, and it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns. Until they received the letter, they believed Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks. Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page letter to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...apture-context-nature-and-substance-of-probe/

It's beginning to look like we're going to need to start another criminal investigation, this time focused on Mr. Barr.
 
Last edited by Xzi,
  • Like
Reactions: heavyd2244

KingVamp

Haaah-hahahaha!
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
13,491
Trophies
2
Location
Netherworld
XP
7,957
Country
United States
So, is this the part where I call you crazy and delusional or maybe buttery males? Maybe somehow reading the opposite of what this says. Is this the part where I suddenly flip on rather Mueller report is reliable or not?

The government is going to need so much clean up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CallmeBerto and Xzi

Hanafuda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
4,491
Trophies
2
XP
6,950
Country
United States
Did you just read the headline, or the whole article?

A day after Mueller sent his letter to Barr, the two men spoke by phone for about 15 minutes, according to law enforcement officials.

In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that media coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the office’s work, according to Justice Department officials. Mueller did not express similar concerns about the public discussion of the investigation of Russia’s election interference, the officials said. Barr has testified previously he did not know whether Mueller supported his conclusion on obstruction.

When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.
 

regnad

Button Masher
Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
2,515
Trophies
1
Age
53
XP
3,678
Country
Japan
Days after the letter and subsequent phone call, Barr was asked under oath if Mueller agreed with his characterization, and he said straight up that he didn't know what Mueller thought.

That's perjury. Simple and unequivocal.

At the VERY least this should require Barr to recuse himself from any further involvement with anything related to the Mueller investigation or any of its ongoing offshoot investigations. But better would be that he step down from his position as AG.

As Ted Lieu said, maybe he could take over SHS's job as Press Secretary where he can lie to the public all he wants.
 

Taleweaver

Storywriter
Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
8,689
Trophies
2
Age
43
Location
Belgium
XP
8,087
Country
Belgium
I have to be honest: I never read that "no collusion" in Barr's summary that Trump touted all the time. Yes, it grossly downplayed a lot of mayor things in the report (as now illustrated by Mueller himself), but I don't jump to the conclusion that just because Barr downplayed the investigation result and withheld the report for some more weeks, he is therefore an accomplice.

At this point, I think he's "merely" being extremely naive. And...he did release the (redacted) report in the end, right? :unsure:
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,533
Country
United States
I have to be honest: I never read that "no collusion" in Barr's summary that Trump touted all the time. Yes, it grossly downplayed a lot of mayor things in the report (as now illustrated by Mueller himself), but I don't jump to the conclusion that just because Barr downplayed the investigation result and withheld the report for some more weeks, he is therefore an accomplice.

At this point, I think he's "merely" being extremely naive. And...he did release the (redacted) report in the end, right? :unsure:
Barr testified today in front of the Senate and was very dodgy about answering a lot of questions directly, if at all. The answers we did get seemed to indicate that Barr barely read the Mueller report at all before issuing his summary, and he may still have yet to read most of it.

Barr was scheduled to testify in front of the House tomorrow, but he's already announced he won't be attending. Needless to say, there are already calls for his resignation, but they'll be starting with a subpoena, and then presumably, contempt hearings.
 

Taleweaver

Storywriter
Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
8,689
Trophies
2
Age
43
Location
Belgium
XP
8,087
Country
Belgium
Barr testified today in front of the Senate and was very dodgy about answering a lot of questions directly, if at all. The answers we did get seemed to indicate that Barr barely read the Mueller report at all before issuing his summary, and he may still have yet to read most of it.

Barr was scheduled to testify in front of the House tomorrow, but he's already announced he won't be attending. Needless to say, there are already calls for his resignation, but they'll be starting with a subpoena, and then presumably, contempt hearings.
Hmm... I have no answer to that (haven't seen much of that testification).

And not attending further hearings... Won't that just prove that something's amiss?

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

William Barr isn't orange, he's a Fred Flintstone-looking skinsuit.
ROFL... I always thought he looked like John Goodman. Who effectively played Fred Flintstone once. :rofl:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi

Hanafuda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
4,491
Trophies
2
XP
6,950
Country
United States
Barr was scheduled to testify in front of the House tomorrow, but he's already announced he won't be attending.


I haven't been following super closely, but wasn't his objection that it wasn't members of the House who were going to question him, but lawyers tuned for attack? I count it as a sign of wisdom when someone knows not to walk into a trap that actually has a "TRAP!" sign hanging on the door.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,533
Country
United States
I haven't been following super closely, but wasn't his objection that it wasn't members of the House who were going to question him, but lawyers tuned for attack? I count it as a sign of wisdom when someone knows not to walk into a trap that actually has a "TRAP!" sign hanging on the door.
Several members of the House are seasoned lawyers themselves. His excuse might as well have simply been, "I'm scared."
 

Hanafuda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
4,491
Trophies
2
XP
6,950
Country
United States
Several members of the House are seasoned lawyers themselves. His excuse might as well have simply been, "I'm scared."

But I believe Barr explicitly stated that he would make himself available to members of Congress only, not their designated inquisitors. The Special Counsel regs state that the AG reports "to Congress."
 

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
But I believe Barr explicitly stated that he would make himself available to members of Congress only, not their designated inquisitors. The Special Counsel regs state that the AG reports "to Congress."
Using lawyers happens all the time in these situations, even to attorneys general. Republicans used one during the Kavanaugh hearing in the Senate, for example. Barr is scared, and I would be too after, among other nonsense, perjuring myself.
 

Hanafuda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
4,491
Trophies
2
XP
6,950
Country
United States
Using lawyers happens all the time in these situations, even to attorneys general. Republicans used one during the Kavanaugh hearing in the Senate, for example. Barr is scared, and I would be too after, among other nonsense, perjuring myself.

The Kavanaugh hearings weren't subject to the Special Counsel regs. Different ballgame.

And as for that perjury claim you've been flogging, even CNN doesn't think it holds water.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/politics/fact-check-william-barr-lie-to-congress/index.html

Besides the requirement of an explicit false statement, note that it must also be a material fact that is falsified. And whether Mueller agreed with Barr's conclusion or not wasn't material, since Mueller's report waived providing an answer to the obstruction question. As far as I've seen it reported, Mueller doesn't believe he even can provide an answer. So his opinion 1) shouldn't be known, and 2) isn't relevant. And the materiality of the question is further diluted by the fact that the report, including Mueller's summaries, has been released.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the_leg

WD_GASTER2

Hated by life itself.
Developer
Joined
Jun 17, 2018
Messages
779
Trophies
1
XP
1,853
Country
United States
you have to admit that if you look at this impartially for even one second....this has been an absolute crap show.
Can they just get Mueller to give his 2 cents and be asked "ok dude, what the F did you actually mean with the darn report"
Republicans are claiming this will hurt democrats and pound on that point consistently....ok...then if this is politics why not let them?
that way everyone call it a day. This whole thing is absurd at this point.

Orange man bad.

Wrong person dude. this would be more like "yabba dabba do man bad"
 
Last edited by WD_GASTER2,
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
you have to admit that if you look at this impartially for even one second....this has been an absolute crap show.
Can they just get Mueller to give his 2 cents and be asked "ok dude, what the F did you actually mean with the darn report"
Republicans are claiming this will hurt democrats and pound on that point consistently....ok...then if this is politics why not let them?
that way everyone call it a day. This whole thing is absurd at this point.
Mueller is limited on what he can say because of the legal framework he set up in the report. It allows him to find him innocent, but doesn’t allow him to indict, to acuse Trump of a crime, or to find him guilty. He’s leaving it to congress and the people to decide.
 

WD_GASTER2

Hated by life itself.
Developer
Joined
Jun 17, 2018
Messages
779
Trophies
1
XP
1,853
Country
United States
my point is, he can still be called in to testify afaik. If the report didnt capture his meaning he should straight up be asked what the meaning is.

Also you change avatars and flags a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
The Kavanaugh hearings weren't subject to the Special Counsel regs. Different ballgame.

And as for that perjury claim you've been flogging, even CNN doesn't think it holds water.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/politics/fact-check-william-barr-lie-to-congress/index.html

Besides the requirement of an explicit false statement, note that it must also be a material fact that is falsified. And whether Mueller agreed with Barr's conclusion or not wasn't material, since Mueller's report waived providing an answer to the obstruction question. As far as I've seen it reported, Mueller doesn't believe he even can provide an answer. So his opinion 1) shouldn't be known, and 2) isn't relevant. And the materiality of the question is further diluted by the fact that the report, including Mueller's summaries, has been released.
First, there is prescendent for the use of lawyers in comparable circumstances, and it's completely allowed by law and regs. The most recent Supreme Court nomination was just a high profile example fresh in most people's heads.

Second, it is a material fact that Mueller did not support Barr's conclusions as presented to Congress and the public, that Mueller told Barr in writing, and Barr lied about it. From Mueller:

"The summary letter... did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."

Barr lied. His credibility is more gone than it already was, and I don't want to hear from Barr anymore. I want to hear from Mueller.
 
Last edited by Lacius,
  • Like
Reactions: Josshy0125 and Xzi

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: :rofl2: :rofl2: