SX OS 2.6 Beta released: full support for Nintendo Switch firmware 7.x
From Team Xecuter:
Download here: -REMOVED-
Download here: -REMOVED-
Last edited by linuxares,
Right. Because people usually believe you, when your shady company and say this and that is true, right?
Trust and facts do come together, when you have to decide if you want to allow something or not based on said claimes.
Dont know how many weddings you have been too but it is one of those ironic things people say when not ironic i guess its true, but isint that Ironic. Do you not think that was her message all along ?
ITs liiiike RAAAaaaaiiiin on your wedding Day !.
I think she didn't understand the concept of irony. as the comedian states it's only ironic if it rains on your wedding day and you're a meteorologist.
Ok so more bad luck than anything else , i still think its ironic she sang a song about irony that is not ironic. I miss TX updates from GBA , kinda ironic.
You're right, I don't have those Keys...
So I can't sign the sept and I don't know if the "plaintext" key in SXOS 2.6 is the "desired" tsec_root_key or not.
You (and me) only can believe those who claims that. Nothing else.
Last edited by josete2k,
yes that's definitely ironic. lol Or how about a blind kkk member who doesn't know he's black.
Pretty Toxic and Racist just to mention my Location, which doesnt even matter to this conversation.
Oh, so you want it banned because it’s encrypted? Ok, lets also go ban homebrew NSPs
It would be odd even for TX to include a TSEC key that they didn't need.
And even if it's not the required TSEC key to sign Sept, it's still a TSEC key that belongs to Nintendo.
Says everyone that has no, or minimal, familiarity with the legal system.
Do you really think SciresM would spend 2 weeks developing a payload to derive all the needed keys, then not use it at all and just hardcode the keys
Do you really think SciresM would spend 2 weeks developing a payload to derive all the needed keys, then not use it at all and just hardcode the keys
Obviously not.
But, again, can you prove that the github code and sept.bin are the same?
I can now say that this code compiled and signed is sept.bin and you have two ways, believe or not believe me...
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int integerType;
float floatType;
double doubleType;
char charType;
// Sizeof operator is used to evaluate the size of a variable
printf("Size of int: %ld bytes\n",sizeof(integerType));
printf("Size of float: %ld bytes\n",sizeof(floatType));
printf("Size of double: %ld bytes\n",sizeof(doubleType));
printf("Size of char: %ld byte\n",sizeof(charType));
return 0;
}
I fail to see how that's "toxic", but I do see how it could be interpreted as racist.
No reason to mention something like that. I dont use something like your Location to get my "Point" across. Just laughable if you cant come up with some reasonable argument and just have to rely on your "Race" card. Yes Gambia isnt a rich location on this Planet, but ist doesnt give someone the right to make fun of that.
I don't really see it as making fun of it, just a mere observation based upon geographic locations; but like I said, I see how you'd interpret it that way. It's not exactly something I'd call toxic however.
This is pretty off-topic, so I wouldn't be surprised if these posts disappeared.
