Hacking CONFIRMED: No roadblocks for 7.0.1 Support on SXOS

Status
Not open for further replies.

V-Temp

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2017
Messages
1,227
Trophies
0
Age
34
XP
1,342
Country
United States
I mean it's a good idea but the price is just off people would consider it at 5 $ a month

Server and bandwidth upkeep make such prices impossible. The idea as a whole was and is stupid.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Guys ,TSEC never got cracked on 6.2. Just bypassed.

Indeed not, and it took a lot of work and effort (hexkyz was at it for a year+ before it even became important) to actually break the system and some real genius work from Mote.

This "soon" from SX is either they're just going to give in to Sept, or they're making up bullshit as they are oft to do to try and not completely cede the market to Atmosphere but that, at this point, seems inevitable. Damage is done from the original delay.
 

gizmomelb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
926
Trophies
0
XP
1,647
Country
Australia
Stopped using SX forever and never recommending it to anyone else, I can't believe I used that shitty CFW for 9 months

You're right, I can't believe you used SX OS for 9 months either, since it was only released on Jun 18 2018 and you've been vehemently against it from at least November 2018.. I couldn't be bothered looking at your earlier posts.

You've used it AT BEST for 5 months, if you've even used it at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peteruk

NFates

Wants to understand™
Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
646
Trophies
0
Location
Probably home.
XP
2,673
Country
Dominican Republic
You're right, I can't believe you used SX OS for 9 months either, since it was only released on Jun 18 2018 and you've been vehemently against it from at least November 2018.. I couldn't be bothered looking at your earlier posts.

You've used it AT BEST for 5 months, if you've even used it at all.
I don't think the point of his comment is how long he used it, but rather his opinion after using it for months.
 

gizmomelb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
926
Trophies
0
XP
1,647
Country
Australia
I don't think the point of his comment is how long he used it, but rather his opinion after using it for months.

I'm just calling him out with his usual over exaggertion and bullshit. I'll have to go digging to see when / where his opinion of SX OS changed and why he switched to atmosphere (apart from it being the only other real CFW option). At a guess I'd hazard maybe the last time TX took a while to release a compliant SX OS version after Nintendo released a newer firmware. Took too long for him to wait.
 

natkoden

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
1,182
Trophies
1
XP
916
Country
Argentina
I'm just calling him out with his usual over exaggertion and bullshit. I'll have to go digging to see when / where his opinion of SX OS changed and why he switched to atmosphere (apart from it being the only other real CFW option). At a guess I'd hazard maybe the last time TX took a while to release a compliant SX OS version after Nintendo released a newer firmware. Took too long for him to wait.

I'm sorry, do you work for TX? Because this is too much.

Who are you? Xecuterman the vigilante?
 

gizmomelb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
926
Trophies
0
XP
1,647
Country
Australia
I'm sorry, do you work for TX? Because this is too much.

Who are you? Xecuterman the vigilante?

umm excuse me, with so many people on here posting FALSE and/or OPINIONATED mis-information they should be held accountable for what they say. Coz guess what kidlie winks? That's how it works in the adult world. It's not like it can be covered up and forgotten about, like the dirty war.
 
Last edited by gizmomelb,

NFates

Wants to understand™
Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
646
Trophies
0
Location
Probably home.
XP
2,673
Country
Dominican Republic
You think the amount of time is immaterial?
What I do think is that he meant to say his opinion of SX OS compared to Atmosphere's exclusive functions. So how long he used it is not something needed to argue.

What matters is that he used SX OS, even if for only a week.
 

gizmomelb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
926
Trophies
0
XP
1,647
Country
Australia
What I do think is that he meant to say his opinion of SX OS compared to Atmosphere's exclusive functions. So how long he used it is not something needed to argue.

What matters is that he used SX OS, even if for only a week.

From his anti SX OS posting history, I am not even certain that he has.

EDIT: ok so far it appears he has at least used SX OS - the pre-hate posts are about XCI loading and how in earlier 2.3/2.4 SX OS the HDD would go to sleep when the console was put into sleep mode (that seems self evident to me.. why would the USB port remain active and supply power to a connected device when the console is in hibernation?) and thus any loaded XCI image was effectively ''ejected''. Umm as we say here in Austrlaia - DUHHHH?!
 
Last edited by gizmomelb,

NFates

Wants to understand™
Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
646
Trophies
0
Location
Probably home.
XP
2,673
Country
Dominican Republic
From his anti SX OS posting history, I am not even certain that he has.
Just like other people decide not to trust Team Xecuter's remarks because of their history of spreading misinformation, which cannot be covered up and forgotten about, you are free to not believe @nachuz because of his anti-TX history.
 

A Generic User

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
134
Trophies
0
XP
862
Country
United States
In my opinion, SX using sept as is for 7.0 support is just never gonna happen. Don't you think that, if that's what they were going to do anyway, they would have done so right from the get go? Not like it would be hard, either.
The only thing they can do to fix this problem is to pwn TSEC, as the only way to compile a working sept without the atmosphere splash screen is with the keys it happens to derive. Given their history, I honestly can't find myself believing that will ever happen, and I echo the few users here (sorry for not remembering the names) that believe they've shifted focus to Stargate since it's their only real source of revenue left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghjfdtg and Lacius

gizmomelb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
926
Trophies
0
XP
1,647
Country
Australia
Just like other people decide not to trust Team Xecuter's remarks because of their history of spreading misinformation, which cannot be covered up and forgotten about, you are free to not believe @nachuz because of his anti-TX history.

to paraphrase Lacias - Nachuz "might or might not" have used SX OS, so I am calling it out the same way the rabble call out TX for saying a release is coming soonTM
 

jorgesd

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
208
Trophies
0
Age
44
XP
521
Country
East Timor
In my opinion, SX using sept as is for 7.0 support is just never gonna happen. Don't you think that, if that's what they were going to do anyway, they would have done so right from the get go? Not like it would be hard, either.
The only thing they can do to fix this problem is to pwn TSEC, as the only way to compile a working sept without the atmosphere splash screen is with the keys it happens to derive. Given their history, I honestly can't find myself believing that will ever happen, and I echo the few users here (sorry for not remembering the names) that believe they've shifted focus to Stargate since it's their only real source of revenue left.
mmm Stargate only works with Sx os? if so then when new games required 7.x masterkeys, will it have a problem?
 

gizmomelb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
926
Trophies
0
XP
1,647
Country
Australia
In my opinion, SX using sept as is for 7.0 support is just never gonna happen. Don't you think that, if that's what they were going to do anyway, they would have done so right from the get go? Not like it would be hard, either.
The only thing they can do to fix this problem is to pwn TSEC, as the only way to compile a working sept without the atmosphere splash screen is with the keys it happens to derive. Given their history, I honestly can't find myself believing that will ever happen, and I echo the few users here (sorry for not remembering the names) that believe they've shifted focus to Stargate since it's their only real source of revenue left.

The general consensus that TX just need to patch or crack the sept loader exploit for 7.0 compatibility shows the ignorance that is needed with software development. With 7.0 various OS libraries would have changed, possibly even be deprecated - so SX OS functions that relied on them would need to be updated to use the newer horizon OS modules and ensure compatibility. that isn't a small amount of work no matter what you're doing or which OS you're writing apps to work under - look at all the issues python programmers have between python versions.

Can you imagine the uproar if TX released a new SX OS which removed say XCI loading, or emuNAND, or USB support - because they couldn't implement those functions under 7.0 horizon OS?

First rule of software app development - you can NEVER remove a feature that has been previously implemented.
 

A Generic User

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
134
Trophies
0
XP
862
Country
United States
The general consensus that TX just need to patch or crack the sept loader exploit for 7.0 compatibility shows the ignorance that is needed with software development. With 7.0 various OS libraries would have changed, possibly even be deprecated - so SX OS functions that relied on them would need to be updated to use the newer horizon OS modules and ensure compatibility. that isn't a small amount of work no matter what you're doing or which OS you're writing apps to work under - look at all the issues python programmers have between python versions.

Can you imagine the uproar if TX released a new SX OS which removed say XCI loading, or emuNAND, or USB support - because they couldn't implement those functions under 7.0 horizon OS?

First rule of software app development - you can NEVER remove a feature that has been previously implemented.
That's true, but I didn't really feel the need to point it out. Considering how much thin ice they're on, they really can't afford to do anything stupid (though I guess one could argue that their current silence is something stupid).

Not that I really expect TX to put the effort anyway, but hey if it happens I'll gladly eat my words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Veho @ Veho: