The funny thing is, when I think of collusion I always think of the trust kind where a bunch of businesses get together and agree on setting prices. Yet, the real kind, long ago, moved away from having a real office with real chairs and real direct words clearly spelling out their intentions because that became plainly illegal. So, yea, I'd be honestly surprised if any in the Trump Campaign explicitly agreed to anything.
On the other hand, if you saw all the major cereal manufacturers in frequent contact with each other and their prices kept going up in unison, there'd be something to investigate. Maybe they're all just discussing about how there was a bad harvest? Maybe their words are even carefully chosen to double down on that point and how "unfortunate" a raise in prices would be. Really, though, as much as I might have a gut feeling about it, I'll await what Mueller's investigation concludes much more than what the Legislative Branch has to say about it.
PS - I would readily acknowledge that a lot of what Trump did in Russia, especially bribery, is probably pretty standard practice. I think Trump may well have been very naive on understand exactly when and how much he could continue doing business with Russia while campaigning. If anything, it'd seem his comments about doing no business with Russia would possibly be more fraud committed against his investors in Russia than collusion with Russia against the US. This all, of course, is basically giving benefit of the doubt that Trump is naive, ignorant, and/or incompetent and that all his speeches could be full of lies without them being taken as truth or deceptive.
Muller ICE Anyone.
