Hacking 6.2.0 released

Adran_Marit · Nov 20, 2018

hatredg0d said:
Then one day you accidently boot into ofw and banned because 90dns couldn't protect you.

AutoRCM

SageIsSerious · Nov 20, 2018

Ashura66 said:
If you're referring to the Ipatched unites they have been saying they are working on a workaround since 2, maybe three versions ago, yet have presented no evidence of such a fix even being in the works. I wouldn't hold my breath

I'm referring to the statement they made in the recent BETA release notes talking about those "New 'unhackable' consoles" being high on the agenda and stating they will deliver.

Is this just them talking shit to sell the Pro and OS? Or are they delivering on what they say? You tell me.

hatredg0d · Nov 20, 2018

Adran_Marit said:
AutoRCM

90dns still isn't a perfect solution that's my point. The way people recommend it are making it sound like something it's not.

Adran_Marit · Nov 20, 2018

hatredg0d said:
90dns still isn't a perfect solution that's my point. The way people recommend it are making it sound like something it's not.

It's your choice if you use it or not. But it does what it says on the box *shrug*

Edit: So much so I couldn't access any nintendo websites for support or CDN stuff while on was on my pc

Ashura66 · Nov 20, 2018

SageIsSerious said:
I'm referring to the statement they made in the recent BETA release notes talking about those "New 'unhackable' consoles" being high on the agenda and stating they will deliver.

Is this just them talking shit to sell the Pro and OS? Or are they delivering on what they say? You tell me.

They have been saying the same thing for at least 3 updates. they keep saying" oh the Ipatched unites, we are working on a workaround, more news at 11". Except 11 never comes around and all we hear is "we are working on it" nothing more

strchsr · Nov 20, 2018

comput3rus3r said:
why are you even online?

I was using a clean NAND backup and getting games off the eShop, namely Undertale and Hollow Knight?

hatredg0d · Nov 20, 2018

Adran_Marit said:
So much so I couldn't access any nintendo websites for support or CDN stuff while on was on my pc

You set 90dns for your entire network? Do you know what a dns server does and why you shouldnt do that?

the_randomizer · Nov 20, 2018

Sonikkua said:
You may be in the wrong sub forum then ;p

I know, and I did think about hacking it at one point, but, given the numerous methods, lack of consolidated guides and techniques, not to mention the risks involved.... *sigh* to me, it's just not worth the hassle.

SageIsSerious · Nov 20, 2018

Ashura66 said:
They have been saying the same thing for at least 3 updates. they keep saying" oh the Ipatched unites, we are working on a workaround, more news at 11". Except 11 never comes around and all we hear is "we are working on it" nothing more

Copy.

I see this as part of the core of the scene, the cat and mouse. I'm not mad it's taking at least 3 updates (and counting) for progress from ANYONE. Solutions are not guaranteed to be easy and quick right out the box nor ever. Who else is working on the new models? Anyone worth keeping tabs on in the race?

Adran_Marit · Nov 20, 2018

hatredg0d said:
You set 90dns for your entire network? Do you know what a dns server does and why you shouldnt do that?

Just on my desktop. I'm well aware of what a dns does. I had it set because I was testing stuff then forgot I was testing it XD

Ashura66 · Nov 20, 2018

SageIsSerious said:
Copy.

I see this as part of the core of the scene, the cat and mouse. I'm not mad it's taking at least 3 updates (and counting) for progress from ANYONE. Solutions are not guaranteed to be easy and quick right out the box nor ever. Who else is working on the new models? Anyone worth keeping tabs on in the race?

If anyone else is, they haven't announced it yet, probably holding back until the Mariko units get released

SageIsSerious · Nov 20, 2018

the_randomizer said:
I know, and I did think about hacking it at one point, but, given the numerous methods, lack of consolidated guides and techniques, not to mention the risks involved.... *sigh* to me, it's just not worth the hassle.

To me, it all boils down to whether online is worth it or not. If you can live without the online aspect then it's worth it. You can be completely cheap and do it for fairly free or spend 26 bux and buy into "convenience".

It's not worth the worry or hassle to keep up with cloaking what you're doing to prevent bans, bans that may come regardless of anything you do, emuNAND or not, risk is constant.

the_randomizer · Nov 20, 2018

SageIsSerious said:
To me, it all boils down to whether online is worth it or not. If you can live without the online aspect then it's worth it. You can be completely cheap and do it for fairly free or spend 26 bux and buy into "convenience".

It's not worth the worry or hassle to keep up with cloaking what you're doing to prevent bans, bans that may come regardless of anything you do, emuNAND or not, risk is constant.

At least with Wii U, Nintendo was lax with their security but this, this is a new beast. Maybe someday...

V-Temp · Nov 20, 2018

SageIsSerious said:
Copy.

I see this as part of the core of the scene, the cat and mouse. I'm not mad it's taking at least 3 updates (and counting) for progress from ANYONE. Solutions are not guaranteed to be easy and quick right out the box nor ever. Who else is working on the new models? Anyone worth keeping tabs on in the race?

The real crux of their bullshit on the ipatched units is from there original 'presentation' on them when they (a.) claimed initially their SX worked on ipatched units because they didn't understand what was patched or wasn't and used an unpatched unit to make a stupid, uninformed and rushed declaration of how SX still worked... on an unpatched unit, and (b.) claimed that dumping ipatch data was proof of their new solution and requiring coldboot to access. To the latter, ipatches do not require coldboot access at all, in fact they are not even 'protected' info, and, to the former, if they had a coldboot solution to access said ipatch data then any and all proof of concept would have been trivial to generate...

... after all they were quick to generate an incorrect PoC on (a.)...

So this is kind of the issue, and why the longer it takes and the more they just say "trust us" the more it just rings hollow. If you have something that works, you have a PoC, so why is it so hard to generate one? They farted out their original PoC on Switch OG models MONTHS before release. They're not shy to blow their load when they have it.

SageIsSerious · Nov 20, 2018

V-Temp said:
The real crux of their bullshit on the ipatched units is from there original 'presentation' on them when they (a.) claimed initially their SX worked on ipatched units because they didn't understand what was patched or wasn't and used an unpatched unit to make a stupid, uninformed and rushed declaration of how SX still worked... on an unpatched unit, and (b.) claimed that dumping ipatch data was proof of their new solution and requiring coldboot to access. To the latter, ipatches do not require coldboot access at all, in fact they are not even 'protected' info, and, to the former, if they had a coldboot solution to access said ipatch data then any and all proof of concept would have been trivial to generate...

... after all they were quick to generate an incorrect PoC on (a.)...

So this is kind of the issue, and why the longer it takes and the more they just say "trust us" the more it just rings hollow. If you have something that works, you have a PoC, so why is it so hard to generate one? They farted out their original PoC on Switch OG models MONTHS before release. They're not shy to blow their load when they have it.

Interesting.
You think they are bluffing because they fail to provide any proof of concept and just words...knowing that they goofed in the past.

Hopefully others are working on it too?

V-Temp · Nov 20, 2018

SageIsSerious said:
Interesting.
You think they are bluffing because they fail to provide any proof of concept and just words...knowing that they goofed in the past.

Hopefully others are working on it too?

I think they are lying because, well, they lied multiple times with regards to these things: (a.) using the wrong unit to make a declaration, (b.) incorrect information about accessing patch data.

You don't usually lie if you have something truthful to say. /shrug

tiliarou · Nov 20, 2018

Of course TX is lying about the ipatched units AND about the 6.2.0 compatibility. This last firmware actually changed how keys are generated, so as usual, reswitched will find a way and TX will steal it.

annson24 · Nov 20, 2018

If you accidentally updated to this and burnt your fuses as well. You can still downgrade back but you'll have to rely on RCM every time to boot.

shanefromoz · Nov 20, 2018

nachuz said:
if you burned fuses, you can but you won't be able to go to sleep mode or booting up on OFW

I have burned fuses and can use sleep mode fine

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Purple_Shyguy said:
Weren't we told way back that the hardware exploit could "never ever" be patched out? Yet here we are?

Gee give the team time to check out the update. I am sure they will release an update soon

Agusto101 · Nov 20, 2018

I guess nintendo will start with the shit..updates every month like the 3ds , the most funny part is that they cant avoid it .

Hacking 6.2.0 released

Walküre's Hacker

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Walküre's Hacker

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

The Temp's official fox whisperer

Active Member

Walküre's Hacker

Well-Known Member

Active Member

The Temp's official fox whisperer

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

The Patient One

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads

Popular threads in this forum