Nintendo wins legal case over ROM site, site owner ordered to pay $12 million in damages

nintendo logo.png

Earlier this summer, Nintendo filed a lawsuit against Jacob Mathias, otherwise known as the owner of LoveROMS and LoveRETRO, sites that notoriously hosted ROM files of retro Nintendo games. Immediately following the legal suit, both of the aforementioned domains were shut down to prevent further issue. Nintendo's legal action also had effects on other websites that had illegal content hosted on their servers, such as Emuparadise, which removed all download links shortly after the lawsuit was made public. Mathias and his wife, who were both charged on mass copyright infringement, plead guilty to the actions of trademark infringement and damages to Nintendo. They then entered settlement talks in order to find an agreeable amount of money to pay as reparations. Today, the final judgement for the case came in, showing that both Jacob Mathias and Nintendo had agreed for the former to pay $12,230,000 to the latter, over 12 million dollars.

yettobesignedorder.png

All copyrighted material owned by the couple must also be forfeited, and ownership of LoveROMs.com and LoveRETRO.co has been signed over to Nintendo of Japan.

:arrow: Source
 

godreborn

Welcome to the Machine
Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
38,471
Trophies
3
XP
29,138
Country
United States
I've always been a Nintendo fan, but not so much after a recent phone conversation. I called to complain that three games wouldn't let me redeem coins (giving different errors), this is seventy cents of coins minds you, but it was the principle of the thing that was important. anyway, Nintendo seemed reluctant to give me those coins as if I was lying for a measly seventy cents. their fuck up, and I'm the one to pay for it. Nintendo has become, or perhaps always was, a greedy, very greedy company.
 

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
31,284
Trophies
2
Age
38
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,969
Country
United States
The law is always going to favor copyright holders, that's not at all surprising. The only surprising things about this case are that the guy didn't do more to keep his identity hidden, and that he didn't get taken down for this a lot sooner. These ROM sites have been around almost as long as I've been gaming.

Then maybe something needs to be done to make copyrights less dickish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi and ThoD

Kayot

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
362
Trophies
0
Website
sites.google.com
XP
490
Country
United States
I'm missing DS Games (5700 to 6000 and > 6400) as well as most of newer consoles such as Wii/PS2/PS3. I don't bother with Xbox anything. My DC collection is pretty complete.
 

G0R3Z

Just Can't Be Bothered
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
766
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
928
Country
It's pretty ridiculous really. A big one is people going "well, they're protecting their property". Just because a rom is on the SNES, it doesn't make it nintendo's property - It'd belong to the original developer, it was only licenced for the SNES by nintendo. A good 90% of these roms will never be seen again on any nintendo console again. I have complete romsets of All NES, SNES and N64, who the hell knows if I'll be able to find them online in 5 or 10 years time. I want to help to preserve that history, even slightly.

Rom sites can be pretty shady, but they are preserving a history that we as gamers care about.
 

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,642
Trophies
2
XP
5,860
Country
United Kingdom
The only surprising things about this case are that the guy didn't do more to keep his identity hidden, and that he didn't get taken down for this a lot sooner.

Nintendo have to learn about it first, it may be coincidence but he was about to introduce a new paid for subscription that meant you avoided adverts.

These ROM sites have been around almost as long as I've been gaming.

I think you should differentiate from rom sites run for no profit, or at a loss, with ones set up to maximise profits. He negotiated to pay twelve million dollars, which means he had twelve million dollars from this.

Then maybe something needs to be done to make copyrights less dickish.

It's currently pretty fair, any changes are likely to go the other way.
 
Last edited by smf,

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,534
Country
United States
Nintendo have to learn about it first, it may be coincidence but he was about to introduce a new paid for subscription that meant you avoided adverts.

I think you should differentiate from rom sites run for no profit, or at a loss, with ones set up to maximise profits. He negotiated to pay twelve million dollars, which means he had twelve million dollars from this.
I doubt he made twelve million in profit, that's just what Nintendo is claiming in damages, and that number may have come down from what it was initially. It was very stupid of him to attempt to profit off of Nintendo ROMs on top of everything else, though. Like I said, it was a miracle they didn't bring a suit earlier, and that move was obviously going to tempt fate a step too far.
 
Last edited by Xzi,
  • Like
Reactions: Redhorse

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
There should be a law (just like with music), that after xx years, it should be free to use and share.

I can’t speak for other countries, but in the US...After a 100 years like books, video game software titles IP rights expire without the ability to renew them. Of course most of us will be long dead by then. I know both sega and Atari talked about in 2007 rereleasing the sources code under the gpn 2.0 of their games after the 50 year mark. More then a decade ago. While sega pretty much remains the same company, Atari has changed ownership several times since then.
 

DarkIrata

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
493
Trophies
0
Age
29
Website
ipmix.de
XP
1,591
Country
Germany
Ok, let me get this straight. Around 90% of the people which posted to this thread are butthurt over a sued by nintendo rom page, which most of them doesn't even knew before? From where i get the information? Read the thread that was made when the lawsuit started.
What makes it even better how all of you prise rom downloads and hating on Nintendo for DOING THERE JOB SO THEY DOEN'T GET SUED FOR TRIPPEL THE AMOUNT. How the fk people forget that gbatemp also once hosted roms and stoped it to become a place to talk / share about stuff like homebrews, news and so on.

Now let me explain how basic copyright in most use cases work.
Bob developes something. Bob has full rights on what he developed. He publishs it by himself on a way how he makes profit out of it. 50 Years passes. Bob never selled the main rights to what he created, but never updated trademarks or similar things. Other people can make somethign similiar and share it for free, BUT THEY CAN NOT SHARE THEY EXACT THING, A COPY, of what Bob made. They don't have the rights on it.
If Bob shared the rights with Alice who published it for him and get a part of the earnings, good for Bob. But when the contract ends, Alice has not anymore the rights to sell Bobs creation, even if Bob would still make profit out of it. Since Alice doesn't have any legal rights to share it anymore, they can't republish it anymore and need to make a new deal with bob.

Ffs, there are reasons why Nintendo doesn't throw around with Roms and Emulators. They still have to protect the rights from the original creators.

Tldr;
People made shit for money, if you have a problem they make use of there rights, go beat someone up and look how it will workout for you.


Goood sometimes this page....


EDIT: Oh and the high amount to pay. Probably calculated by downloads per rom * rom price and some other things. His own fault. He knew what he was doing. So don't say it is Nintendos fault.
 
Last edited by DarkIrata,
  • Like
Reactions: nccom

ThoD

GBATemp Addict (apparently), but more like "bored"
Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
3,631
Trophies
1
Age
27
XP
3,049
Country
Greece
Then maybe something needs to be done to make copyrights less dickish.
I agree, copyrights last FAR too long for nowadays' standards! If I remember correctly it's life of creator plus 45 years with minimum having to be 70 total or something like that even though with the sped up world we live in it should never be more than 30... 20 is actually the most reasonable, if you haven't done anything in 20 years, it's your fault and if you have, you had plenty of time to make money off of it! It's really annoying wanting to make commercial fan-made games based on certain series but not being able to just because the assholes at Disney bribed the entire US government to raise the limit:/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger21820

nando

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
2,263
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
1,023
Country
United States
Please, don't try to make apple look better than they are. That's impossible. /s+-

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


You are joking right?


it's a fact. apples stand on piracy was to never treat their costumers like a criminal.
USA! USA! USA! Good old freedom prevails again thanks to the American legal system. On a less ironic note, I have no idea what exactly loveroms had on offer, but considering the name of the website didn't include 'nintendo', I suppose they had more than just thirty-five-year-old first-party Nintendo games. With that in mind, it's fascinating that Nintendo managed to proclaim and obtain actual ownership over the loveroms websites, suggesting that Nintendo is, in fact, the owner of all video games in history.


The fact that they're part of all spying programs (that consider everyone to be a criminal) suggests otherwise.


right. like unlocking iphones for the fbi. come up with actual examples are shut up. you can hate apple but they are far better than petty ass nintendo.
 

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,642
Trophies
2
XP
5,860
Country
United Kingdom
I doubt he made twelve million in profit, that's just what Nintendo is claiming in damages,

They wanted $100 million, he himself came up with the offer of $12 million. It was his idea to settle before the case was heard.

It wouldn't make sense for him to agree to pay more than he'd made.
 
Last edited by smf,

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,534
Country
United States
They wanted $100 million, he himself came up with the offer of $12 million. It wouldn't make sense for him to agree to pay more than he'd made.
I doubt they would've taken less than ten mil regardless of how much he had actually made. His lawyer isn't going to match up to their team of lawyers. This was a statement suit more than anything. Nintendo knows there are still millions (if not billions) of complete ROM set copies floating around out there, but they will come after you if you host them without anonymity and/or try to profit off them.
 
Last edited by Xzi,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N-3vv4kzdk