Weekend Discussion: What would you do if games only released in a digital format?

physicalgaem4eva.png

Chances are, if you're a fan of video games, you've more than likely gone to a store to pick up the latest hot fall game release. If not, then you likely have purchased a game online and had it shipped to your door. From the older cardboard boxes housing bulky game carts, to the plastic cases that hold thin game discs, we've seen multiple forms of video games throughout the years. While the form of its delivery has changed, what hasn't changed is the fact that if you want to play a game, you need to get a cart or disc.

That is, unless you buy digitally.

The advent of digital games has changed the entire industry. The previous console gaming generation introduced the idea of being able to download older retro titles, or even smaller indie-developed games by simply connecting to the internet and paying through a digital storefront. Shortly after that, we began to see fully fledged major releases on both Xbox Live Arcade and PlayStation Network, and later, the Nintendo eShop. During those years, there was a heavy push for being able to have your library of games be playable without even getting up to change the disc. Not everyone was willing to take that step, however, with a large portion of players preferring their beloved boxes. PC gamers might be more at-home with being invested in a digital only library--they're familiar with forgoing physical releases. If you play only on a computer, there's a chance that you may not even own a single hard copy of a game.

To counter the rise of the "digital age", many people were outspoken about only supporting physical releases. This led to small publishers like Limited Run Games becoming incredibly popular, and providing fans with official boxed copies of smaller titles that wouldn't normally be put on such a format.

Even if you do purchase a physical game these days, you might find yourself forced to download it to your system anyway, and in the Nintendo Switch's case, sometimes the full game doesn't even fit on the game cart itself. SD flash storage and HDD prices are falling more and more with each passing year, and it makes going all in on digital gaming a more appealing option. Especially in regards to the Switch, because while it is considered a home console, it also has a portable function, and having to carry multiple cartridges on the go alongside it can be considered cumbersome.

Though a full-digital future isn't imminent--the chances of the next generation of PlayStation and Xbox ditching discs entirely is unlikely--it appears that the industry is certainly trying to move towards that goal. Representatives and analysts from influential companies like EA, Ubisoft, and Activision all believe that in the next decade, physical games will be a thing of the past. More niche games have even managed to make their way stateside purely on fact that a digital-only version would be much more financially viable, compared to having to release it on store shelves.

What are your thoughts? Have you already made the jump to a digital world? Or are you a collector, and the thought of not being able to buy a physical copy of your favorite games pains you? If such a future time comes and you're forced to play digital-only, will you be okay with that? Let us know in the comments below!
 

DeadSkullzJr

Developer
Developer
Joined
Sep 28, 2017
Messages
1,554
Trophies
1
XP
3,877
Country
United States
The idea of going digital 24/7 seems a bit of a hassle. Here’s why, one no console like the switch nor any console for that matter has unlimited space, that’s simply not possible. Consoles today (at least for Nintendo’s case) use MicroSD cards to store all the data of the console and the games downloaded. Imagine downloading one of those AAA titles that are like 3GB+ or more. That’s just one game alone, imagine a library of games, boom your SD card space is gone, you are left to buy yet another SD card to keep building the collection. Now most would say there is nothing wrong with that, however they completely forget the fact that not everyone is made of money, they can’t afford to keep buying $60+ microSD cards with absurd amounts of space constantly. I’ve always loved the idea of having physical copies, you get to leave room for smaller games that you can’t actually buy physical copies of. It’s like what I do for the 3DS. I currently use a 32GB SanDisk Ultra, I have no digital downloads on the console other than virtual console, emulators, etc. I have physical copies of the 3DS games to save those extra gigabytes on my SD card for smaller content. Doing it this way prevents you from having to switch SD cards constantly. People say they don’t like carrying around cartridges all the time, all I can say about that is where there is pros there is always cons. It is what it is, either buy a nice case to hold your games or buy a flashcart to hold your backups. You can’t have your cake and eat it to you know lol. Another thing to bare in mind, using digital downloads for everything kinda defeats the purpose of going out and getting at least some fresh air, buying a game at your local game store in the end. Basically just going out and about in general, we evolved into an age of laziness lol. We also evolved into a state where people lack patience and expect everything they want to be delivered to them right then and there on a silver pladder.
 
Last edited by DeadSkullzJr,

Ryccardo

Penguin accelerator
Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
7,687
Trophies
1
Age
28
Location
Imola
XP
6,902
Country
Italy
You're not buying a digital copy , you're leasing it. Don't believe me ? Wait about 10 years after the system that you're using is no longer supported and the harddrive in said system is no longer operable. How do you expect to redownload said game ? You wont be able to. But you won't have that issue with a physical copy.
From the legal backups you have made (oh sorry, you're American and have the DMCA), or from less legal backups other people have made

As I opined earlier, digital distribution (with DRM involved) does have disadvantages, but on most if not all current Nintendo consoles, those disadvantages have been solved

None of my physical games came with free, official, 5+ year (and, unofficially, potentially infinite) loss & corruption replacement insurance either!
 

mario5555

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2012
Messages
121
Trophies
0
Age
54
XP
371
Country
United States
With a recent poll (26 Aug 2018) at Gamefaqs, almost 50% buy at least half to all of their games digitally.

Younger/newer games to the hobby only care about the experience of playing and not the collection aspect. So while us older gamers want to have a copy to hold in their hands that attitude will become less and less as time moves forward.

The big 3 will keep pushing towards that and will receive less and less push back from the gaming community because those upcoming gamers won't care, and based on that apathy will allow them to move onto the thing that some of us today couldn't even conceive of 10 years ago. With the proliferation of Steam becoming the dominant PC games distribution platform changing attitudes towards digital distribution this doesn't come as a massive surprise.

It'll be one of the main console developers (probably Microsoft, as they are rumored to have a streaming XBox, as one of the rumored SKU's for the next generation) and depending on the success of that, then I see Sony & Nintendo following suit with their own digital only machines. For the record, Sony already did it 1st with the PSP Go, which was a digital only handheld, which wasn't well received, but as time has passed, has been embraced by PSP owners.

Edit: For me personally, that's when I'm done with the hobby and newer games, I have more than enough to play that'll last a lifetime (plus some) so I'll let everyone enjoy their all digital future, I might peek in from time to time (if when I start a family and want to share that with my kids) but I'd be done with it on a personal level.

I've been saying it since the PS3 era, it's not a matter of if the all digital future happens, it's only a matter of WHEN.
 
Last edited by mario5555,

Noctosphere

Nova's Guardian
Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
6,742
Trophies
3
Age
30
Location
Biblically accurate Hell
XP
18,533
Country
Canada
From the legal backups you have made (oh sorry, you're American and have the DMCA), or from less legal backups other people have made

As I opined earlier, digital distribution (with DRM involved) does have disadvantages, but on most if not all current Nintendo consoles, those disadvantages have been solved

None of my physical games came with free, official, 5+ year (and, unofficially, potentially infinite) loss & corruption replacement insurance either!
not sure to understand.
Do you mean making backup isn't illegal?
That only distributing them is?
 

Ryccardo

Penguin accelerator
Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
7,687
Trophies
1
Age
28
Location
Imola
XP
6,902
Country
Italy
not sure to understand.
Do you mean making backup isn't illegal?
That only distributing them is?
2- correct, distributing copyrighted material is generally illegal

1- making backups for personal use is legal (not only not-prohibited, but explicitly allowed) in many countries
However the DMCA (a law of the USA) prohibits "bypassing a functional copy protection mechanism" (wording not exact), which conflicts with your right to make backups

(of course, if they are really for personal use, it's basically impossible to be caught; and everyone is innocent until caught, tried, and convicted)
 

DeadSkullzJr

Developer
Developer
Joined
Sep 28, 2017
Messages
1,554
Trophies
1
XP
3,877
Country
United States
not sure to understand.
Do you mean making backup isn't illegal?
That only distributing them is?
Backing up/dumping your games is not illegal. You own a copy of said game, it’s illegal however to download a game you don’t own a copy of however. Distributing the ROMs to the public is illegal regardless of you owning a copy or not, this is due to you enabling pirates to download a game they don’t own a copy of. Even though you aren’t charging for said distribution, you still break copyright and what not because you are handing a game out for free.
 
Last edited by DeadSkullzJr,
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
2,576
Trophies
2
XP
3,791
Country
United States
Physical releases on consoles are nothing more than a formality at this point, especially considering that you have to download the game to your hard drive anyways. They're great as collectibles, but they don't have much purpose beyond that.
In most cases, the data is still actually on the disc though, and you could play it offline when the day comes that the Microsoft Store and PSN shutdown or block the PS4 and Xbone from connecting. You still have to install it. The reason for this is because optical media, Blu-ray in particular, is ungodly slow and isn't suited for the types of games we have these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted User

kingfrost

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
255
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
316
Country
United States
My issue with is mostly that once these becomes the norm the next step is to make us constantly stream games as the final blow against piracy and I definitely don't want that.

I don't mind digitally or physically owning a game either way as long as I actually own it.
 

CitizenSnips

a seldom-used crab named Lucky
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
662
Trophies
0
XP
474
Country
United States
I would be quite upset, I currently can only use Hughesnet as my ISP, I pay about $100/month for 30gb/month, and throttled speeds are totally abysmal (1megabit/s down). I already have major trouble downloading things from steam and updating my console games, it'd make matters way worse for me. Physical media still serves a purpose. Only when a reliable, unhindered internet connection is available to everyone on Earth, is when digital-only would be feasible in my eyes
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
In most cases, the data is still actually on the disc though, and you could play it offline when the day comes that the Microsoft Store and PSN shutdown or block the PS4 and Xbone from connecting. You still have to install it. The reason for this is because optical media, Blu-ray in particular, is ungodly slow and isn't suited for the types of games we have these days.
Right, and I can see how that would ultimately be a more viable option in areas where internet speeds aren't as good. However, as games get bigger and bigger, and internet speeds continue to improve worldwide (hopefully), it will get to the point where companies won't find releasing games on physical media profitable any more. While BDXL seems to have physical releases safe for the time being, I'd imagine games (sans indie titles and other smaller-scale games) are only going to get bigger as time goes on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

lafleche

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
645
Trophies
1
XP
2,987
Country
Netherlands
I guess all arguments already have been said .
My opinion: digital makes me too dependent on the acts and deeds of the companies (sony, Nintendo and so on) on keeping their servers up and running.
Wii is going next year, don't know about Sony attitude on support on psp and ps3.
When will wiiu, switch and ps4 servers go in say 10 years?
Reselling and buying 2nd hand games: not possible.
Nope: for me no digital if i have the choice.
 

vincentx77

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
433
Trophies
1
XP
2,213
Country
United States
I've already gone digital on PS4 and PC. When I do buy physical releases for the PS4, they tend to be games series that I'm a huge fan of, and that I just want the physical 'thing' (or I've found an old or used release for absolutely dirt cheap). I've got a lot of digital on PS3, but part of the is PS Plus freebies, and the other is psn cheapies. I only bought 1 full price PS3 retail game digitally. I want to say that I bought Vita games physical, but thinking about it, probably 80% of my library is digital, too (but that's because I have an embarrassingly high number of Vita games.)
My 3DS and my Switch make up the lion's share of my physical video game collection. Most of my Switch digital downloads are cheap indies or codes that came in a box (Bayonetta, anyone?) For some reason, I did choose to purchase Mario Kart digitally, but all of my other full price games are physical. And I have more than I've had time to play.

The point to that gigantic ramble is that so long as these companies guarantee us the ability to access our purchases in the future, I greatly prefer digital. I don't have unlimited space, so I don't like having this 'things' sitting on shelves that could be used for something more practical (or just be empty and more aesthetically pleasing). I like not looking at a giant stack of crap that reminds me of how much money I've spent on this hobby. Having all of my games on a couple of sd cards, or hdds, and not have to search for a disc or a cart every time I want to play something is bloody freakin' convenient. And when you couple that with the fact that some of these newer games ship with a copy on the disc that's barely even playable without the day 1 patch, having physical is really starting to seem like much ado about nothing.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,285
Country
United Kingdom
having physical is really starting to seem like much ado about nothing.
For this digital lark can I resell it, buy a copy someone else resold, lend it to a friend, drag it round a friend's for an evening? Aka how games, books, CDs, films.... have worked for decades.

There is no technical reason I can't do that with downloaded games, indeed I could probably do it better with such a thing. Do I have a nice little thing I can do that with though? Give me that and I will drop physical formats in short order (if you want to have a game shop I can go download something in to a SD then so much the better). Pending that day to say physical holds no values seems horribly short sighted.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: Hmmm for me it's probably F-Zero X at least in my top 3