You know - except for the state instituted beheadings, that sound a tad "radical" to a western audience.. But then, their airlines are world class.
And I'm sure its good to live in a relatively stable part of that region. *nod* SJWs are ruining everything we love
- Thread starter Drak0rex
- Start date
- Views 18,649
- Replies 213
- Likes 23
And I'm sure its good to live in a relatively stable part of that region. *nod* 
Exactly. I mean, there are obviously situations in which you really CAN'T change, for instance, the race of a character (Black Panther comes to mind), but otherwise writers have pretty broad creative license when it comes to comic book characters, to the point where there are probably hundreds of parallel timelines by now
Femisnist's and Menist's are toxic to society. They kill thousands.
Stupid Toxic Masculinity starts wars and Toxic Femininity causes thousands to starve to death.
We must exterminate Toxic Masculinity and Toxic Femininity.
Well Masculinity and Femininity are neither exclusive to either gender. And man can be feminine and women can be masculine.
Extreme Feminists are more on the aggressive masculine side then feminine side.
Femininity would be more of the motherly protective traits and agreeableness more common in women. Creating a society based on protecting others taken to the extreme can be damaging. Like political policies based equality of outcome. You are making sure everyone gets equal pay, but in the end its damaging, and everyone gets an equal chance to starve to death and societies crumble. The motherly traits of taking care of others taken to the extreme is an example of Toxic Femininity.
There needs to be some wealth inequality to produce wealth. Ceo's needs to obviously needs to make more than the people they hire so they can use the extra money to invest and expand the company. How much inequality there needs to be no one knows. No one can point to a specific amount. And basically people are treated like guinea pigs for wealth distribution policies to see what works or not. Some societies not successful and people starve and die.
Okay...? Do you have an example of how that supposedly has caused "thousands to starve to death"?...
Like, don't get me wrong, I absolutely recognize that women are capable of being incredibly abusive towards other people, but I've never seen a valid example of women (or feminine men/nonbinaries) systematically using their femininity to oppress a population
No they are not intending to oppress a population initially, but in the end populations are worse off. Just like how racism people think and convinced themselves they are doing good for society by exterminating said so called "evil race." And men can show feminine traits as well. But motherly traits of taking care of others taken to the extreme making sure everyone has equal pay, causes places to crumble and starve "Soviet Russia" and any other country that followed the same path, is an example of feminine policies applied to a systematic level. So its toxic femininity. Its a mixture of masculine and feminine everyone expresses.
Last edited by SG854,
Made an account for this; Op I agree that they do ruin everything they touch with very few exceptions - like a hand full-
Sjws and movies: can't really name any since I don't watch movies; Power Rangers, Ghost Busters Potentially; THE INCREDIBLES 2...Maybe? Plot will revolve around Helen Par and from what I saw its giving off mad, "Strong independent woman don't need no man." vibes instead of focusing on the WHOLE family.
Sjws and comics: I don't read em, wanted to start collecting but got wind of all the sjw content on both sides -dc/marvel- so I didn't bother after I did some digging around for myself, funny enough Sjws are in an uproar over a nonpolitical comic out selling all the crap that was made FOR them! and funnier still they keep getting canceled left and right...
Sjws and shows: Cables' dead but the one sjw show I do watch is Steven Universe freakin love it but it does have it problems. Question: Would the show even be on air if all the characters genders were reversed? Or better yet y no gay males yo?
Sjws and Video Games: Where to even begin? Buttcracks? anita? Mirrors edge? D.O.A Vollyball Ban? Street Fighter V? Destiny 2?
Sjws and Internet: anita and zoe quinn visited the un to give a speech about how people OVER THE INTERNET should be fined and or arrested if they hurt muh feelings.
Sjws and Youtube: Susan Wojcicki ceo of youtube graced us with the current state of that site making it near impossible to be a youtuber with a opinion or god forbid a conservitive channel.
Sjws and Language: Muh Pronouns, various states have flirted with the idea of fining or jailing people for, "Consistently misusing and refusing to "correct" use of pronouns"
Sjws and Californian Law: People no longer have to disclose that they have H.I Mutha effing V! Really? Lets let people in the country that, could commit a murder and can't really be traced, and even if they were trace they more then likely went back already, which we have no jurisdiction to follow even if we know who it is.
Sjws and guns: You already know what they want to do; sheep to the slaughter they are trying to prevent.
SJws and Education: Colleges are no longer the forming and clashing of ideas for the advancement of mankind nope go to your safe space. Christianity in schools not okay, but Sharia-law-a-facation a okay
But SJWs DINdu NuFFin...
Sjws and movies: can't really name any since I don't watch movies; Power Rangers, Ghost Busters Potentially; THE INCREDIBLES 2...Maybe? Plot will revolve around Helen Par and from what I saw its giving off mad, "Strong independent woman don't need no man." vibes instead of focusing on the WHOLE family.
Sjws and comics: I don't read em, wanted to start collecting but got wind of all the sjw content on both sides -dc/marvel- so I didn't bother after I did some digging around for myself, funny enough Sjws are in an uproar over a nonpolitical comic out selling all the crap that was made FOR them! and funnier still they keep getting canceled left and right...
Sjws and shows: Cables' dead but the one sjw show I do watch is Steven Universe freakin love it but it does have it problems. Question: Would the show even be on air if all the characters genders were reversed? Or better yet y no gay males yo?
Sjws and Video Games: Where to even begin? Buttcracks? anita? Mirrors edge? D.O.A Vollyball Ban? Street Fighter V? Destiny 2?
Sjws and Internet: anita and zoe quinn visited the un to give a speech about how people OVER THE INTERNET should be fined and or arrested if they hurt muh feelings.
Sjws and Youtube: Susan Wojcicki ceo of youtube graced us with the current state of that site making it near impossible to be a youtuber with a opinion or god forbid a conservitive channel.
Sjws and Language: Muh Pronouns, various states have flirted with the idea of fining or jailing people for, "Consistently misusing and refusing to "correct" use of pronouns"
Sjws and Californian Law: People no longer have to disclose that they have H.I Mutha effing V! Really? Lets let people in the country that, could commit a murder and can't really be traced, and even if they were trace they more then likely went back already, which we have no jurisdiction to follow even if we know who it is.
Sjws and guns: You already know what they want to do; sheep to the slaughter they are trying to prevent.
SJws and Education: Colleges are no longer the forming and clashing of ideas for the advancement of mankind nope go to your safe space. Christianity in schools not okay, but Sharia-law-a-facation a okay
But SJWs DINdu NuFFin...
Unrelated to your post, but god that formatting is the definition of cancer
As for the Incredibles; what? Having a film revolve around a woman is neither 'SJW pandering' or new. We've also seen plenty of the WHOLE family in the trailers, so it just seems like you're looking for things to complain about...
Steven Universe is an alright show, I do agree it goes a little too far, though. I'm all for gay characters, but sometimes SU makes it feel really forced and unlikeable. I don't want any of the gems liking men, don't get me wrong, but do we REALLY need Pearl whining about Rose every other episode? C'mon...
Haven't played any of those video games :/
Guns need to go. Seriously, America has mass shootings like every other day. What the hell? They don't have to take guns from people, just stop selling them to people, unless they have LEGITIMATE reasons for buying one (no, self defense doesn't count). Nowhere else in the world has this big an issue with gun crime.
As for 'Christianity in schools not okay'... What????????????????????????????
We should buy an island with no possible Internet connectivity to contain the SJWs. To make it extra triggering for them we should let those brave men and women who oppose them be the ones to fly them over.
Also, only give them enough fuel for a one-way trip so we can solve two (relatively minor) annoyances at once. Plus they'll be happier since they'll be doing what they love best, accusing the other of being literal Nazis "ruining everything" so it's a win-win for everybody.
Also, only give them enough fuel for a one-way trip so we can solve two (relatively minor) annoyances at once. Plus they'll be happier since they'll be doing what they love best, accusing the other of being literal Nazis "ruining everything" so it's a win-win for everybody.
You know... I guess I don't get this mindset
jesus you guys, stop trying to have a normal conversation with these people.
they're so deep in their cultish 'the world is anti-male and women are literally evil and we need to fight it' fantasy world that little can reach them.
indulging them is about the worst thing anyone can do here cause that gives them some level of legitimization and a platform to push their crazy agenda.
they're so deep in their cultish 'the world is anti-male and women are literally evil and we need to fight it' fantasy world that little can reach them.
indulging them is about the worst thing anyone can do here cause that gives them some level of legitimization and a platform to push their crazy agenda.
Wasn't gonna reply, but since we agreed on a few things, I'll clarify few points, I don't care if the main character is female there have been plenty of female main leads done right. Note I didn't say bad ass or anything of that sort its because she doesn't need to be bad ass to be great, I'm just thrown off by the fact that the main focus is going to be mainly her. I just don't want it to be one of those see; this is how its like to be woman type deals because did they or did they not put Mr. Incredible in the caregiver role? The trailer shows some dude saying the have an interest in all Supers but they just go with just Helen? Oh Hel-en no!
It has been established that state and church is separated in schools because enough atheist whined about a God they don't believe in hurting the mental growth and personal beliefs of their children who will grow up and establish their own beliefs one day anyway... and a couple of words in the pledge of allegiance but suddenly the muslim faith is catered to example: Halloween is no longer called Halloween but a harvest festival.
there are more examples I can give but I've been up since 6pm yesterday and wanna rest. Lastly really? insulting my formatting? I'm a noob ya know! made me kek.
If thats the only transformation that you have to deal with - thats commercial. Heck living in Europe, I even remember the days where we didnt have a Halloween, before we imported it from the US. For us those were they days where we visited the resting places of our loved ones, not gave out candy and bought plastic skeletons, or wore costumes to parties.
If those are the things you remember fondly - no one actually took them away in a big ruse, its just merchants trying to sell the stuff in the least offensive way possible to as many people as possible.
Also - on the part of the separation of state and church on a very basic level, both are systems that reporduce a certain kind of order. Both clashed in the past, the church didn't win - but was still important enough to be granted huge tax benefits and even the power to take in money through certain state venues. Both systems coexist - and if you look at the benefits of science based temples, in terms of economic growth alone - churches couldnt have even competed - you would have found yourself in one of those second world countries, you are now worried - that would take over your society... :/
And the truth is, especially when we look at the "middle east refugee crisis", the US didn't own up to any responsibility it historically and regionally/politically had. The numbers in the scaremongering Canada video, were laughingly small compared to what Europeans had to deal with, not to even speak of egyptians, turks, or other somewhat stable states in that region.
The US excuse was always "we are afraid of terrorists" - but those people, at large fled because of violent conflict in their regions, that wasn't entirely unrelated to our foreign politics (to put it mildly).
You'll take them in, you deal with it. You close your borders - if your own society rebels against it, because right wing populists make this about "them eating away your tax payers benefits". The truth is, as a large country - you can get money to board them up for a few years, and some of them even for life - for free. Even the relationship you have with those nations, post conflict - when people return (and many of them will) are worth more than feeding and boarding up those people for five or six years. In monetary value.
Also - I might add, that its literally comical, that US citizens are now going through an ultra nationalist phase. I mean, have you looked at your own "ancestry" polls recently? http://www.businessinsider.com/largest-ethnic-groups-in-america-2013-8?IR=T
Your churches and believe systems still don't have to go away. Not in your lifetime, not in your sons lifetime. If you are coming from a believe system - that you are the only true and godloved group the truth is, that those never remained culturally "dominant" for all that long, new cultures always came and went, and if one remained the same for more than 200 years - you have anthropologists studying them as curiosities.
Also there is a thing called cultural assimilation - so over time, cultures mix - especially in the US - so you also will never be "on the outside", if you dont chose to be. If immigration politics are done right - and I can tell you, europeans have just taken in tens of millions of refugees from pridominantly islamic countries and our churches are still standing.
So is our conservative right. They just grew stronger on a stance, that "the steady flow of immigrants - at some point has to stop" - which was more of a "instituitions were overwhelmed" issue, than anything else. (Economically motivated migrations are increasing as well, and apparently, also we are building walls and fences on other continents... But thats another unpleasant topic.)
If those are the things you remember fondly - no one actually took them away in a big ruse, its just merchants trying to sell the stuff in the least offensive way possible to as many people as possible.
Also - on the part of the separation of state and church on a very basic level, both are systems that reporduce a certain kind of order. Both clashed in the past, the church didn't win - but was still important enough to be granted huge tax benefits and even the power to take in money through certain state venues. Both systems coexist - and if you look at the benefits of science based temples, in terms of economic growth alone - churches couldnt have even competed - you would have found yourself in one of those second world countries, you are now worried - that would take over your society... :/
And the truth is, especially when we look at the "middle east refugee crisis", the US didn't own up to any responsibility it historically and regionally/politically had. The numbers in the scaremongering Canada video, were laughingly small compared to what Europeans had to deal with, not to even speak of egyptians, turks, or other somewhat stable states in that region.
The US excuse was always "we are afraid of terrorists" - but those people, at large fled because of violent conflict in their regions, that wasn't entirely unrelated to our foreign politics (to put it mildly).
You'll take them in, you deal with it. You close your borders - if your own society rebels against it, because right wing populists make this about "them eating away your tax payers benefits". The truth is, as a large country - you can get money to board them up for a few years, and some of them even for life - for free. Even the relationship you have with those nations, post conflict - when people return (and many of them will) are worth more than feeding and boarding up those people for five or six years. In monetary value.
Also - I might add, that its literally comical, that US citizens are now going through an ultra nationalist phase. I mean, have you looked at your own "ancestry" polls recently? http://www.businessinsider.com/largest-ethnic-groups-in-america-2013-8?IR=T
Your churches and believe systems still don't have to go away. Not in your lifetime, not in your sons lifetime. If you are coming from a believe system - that you are the only true and godloved group the truth is, that those never remained culturally "dominant" for all that long, new cultures always came and went, and if one remained the same for more than 200 years - you have anthropologists studying them as curiosities.
Also there is a thing called cultural assimilation - so over time, cultures mix - especially in the US - so you also will never be "on the outside", if you dont chose to be. If immigration politics are done right - and I can tell you, europeans have just taken in tens of millions of refugees from pridominantly islamic countries and our churches are still standing.
So is our conservative right.
They just grew stronger on a stance, that "the steady flow of immigrants - at some point has to stop" - which was more of a "instituitions were overwhelmed" issue, than anything else. (Economically motivated migrations are increasing as well, and apparently, also we are building walls and fences on other continents... But thats another unpleasant topic.)
Last edited by notimp,
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
- Messages
- 2,832
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 34
- Location
- Your mom's basement.
- Website
- www.gaiaonline.com
- XP
- 3,611
- Country
Best thing to do is not give them any money. Do any big or indie western games have any worth anymore? no.
I might be called a weeb but I don't support western devs anymore.
I might be called a weeb but I don't support western devs anymore.
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2,082
- Trophies
- 1
- Location
- Solar Federation
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 704
- Country
You can be latino and black at the same time as latino isn't a race.
Facepalm. Well you can also be black and an italian or dutch but that wasn't what i meant. Latino can also be used as a skin colour reference so stop with the pc bullshit please and seeing your comment gives away that you're one of those social justice warriors
Last edited by kumikochan,
-
Xdqwerty
what are you looking at?
