We don't know how many people were taking that poll seriously, how many people voted Trump because they specifically didn't want Hillary nor how many people didn't voted at all.
Not that I agree or disagree here, but to be fair, not like the transgender population is that big compare to the rest of the human population. Chances of it happening and being reported is much lower.
My point on the matter was to highlight the poll for the primaries, not the election itself. During the primaries you had the option to vote for virtually every running Democrat, Republican, and I believe @Lacius tossed a few third parties in there, too, and yet if Donald Trump were elected solely by GBAtemp members he would have won the popular vote. In my eyes that's a bit telling as to the political leanings of the community, but if you want me to put money where my mouth is I can resurrect the debate club one more time with a formal political party poll (obviously with more than two options, as is standard for me)
I think your argument would carry a bit more weight if you had said "boys who like shopping and boys who play videogames" and "girls who like partying and girls who like sports"
Which is understandable, for the election. But as I said, during the primaries you (royal, not specifically YOU) could have voted for anyone, even if you were voting against Hillary
that works as well. my point was to list 2 things that are not even close to each other to show that u dont have to be one specific thing to be one gender. but yeah what you said works too and i agree with it
The reason I said what I did specifically is that you listed two things that have historically been categorically "masculine" and "feminine", which in my eyes worked against the argument you were trying to make to the point you were almost arguing the opposite lol
I wouldn't say it's correct that the other candidates chickened out. They lost their primaries. You can't blame the candidates - you have to blame the voter base who gave Trump the nomination.
Australia, I believe, has a system where you rank every candidate from most preferable to least on a number scale (1 being highest), and the person who's ranked highest wins. That way you never have to explicitly vote "for" or "against" someone
Not needed, but I still think it came down to the candidates themselves and for reasons I already stated. Not rather if they were strictly conservative or not. Trump isn't really the traditional "conservative" person anyway.
I know that, they are still males... And you know what I meant. Same for XXX, still females..
Actually it has not been that way since the start, it has actually only been that way since Christian Europeans made it that way. Before Christianity a lot of cultures were both trans friendly and often acknowledged more than 2 genders. Christian Europeans were actually the ones who decided to change definition of gender to biological sex.
@
Xdqwerty:
@
realtimesave:
