• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Do you believe Russia hacked the US election?

What do you think is really going on? Let's get a little political here.

I assume you've all heard of the recent Vermont power grid "hacking" story. A few days ago a Vermont utility company found a russian virus on some guy's computer and (part of) the press extrapolated the fact, turning it into a so-called proof of a Russian conspiracy to hack the US power grid... That title was a fucking clickbait, and I just knew it. But not just your average buzzshit clickbait, a serious fucking one this time. When you read the article it became clear: pure bullshit. No evidence whatsoever, all that happened is that they found a regular virus on a random guy's computer, which happens a million times a day everywhere in the world. A few hours later they retracted, a lot of other sites and agencies stated that there was no such thing as a power grid hack attempt. Those media outlets jumped to conclusions to serve their own agenda, it seems.

Now regarding the "hacking" of the US election. Several US government agencies are claiming it's real. Are we being lied to? Are the FBI and homeland security and others all following orders of a higher instance or do they have actual evidence?
So far, they haven't shared much with the general public. Last week they released a document, which I read, but if you read it too you will find that it's absolutely empty of evidence. All it states is "we found some IP addresses in the logs" and "we found a bit of code that was used before". That amounts to nothing at all.

So why do they keep going on about this?
Do you think these agencies have insights they cant share with the public? could they have informants within the russian goverment? that's one of the few things I can think of that they would never be able to reveal. Or maybe it is just more political bullshit... but what's the point? Trump will take office soon and all this Russia crap isn't working. Apparently Trump has something to say on the subject that he will reveal on tuesday or wednesday. I wonder what that may be.

d7e413a2ab0f4b30b7759b3064fd6b0b.jpg
 

Sketchy1

gbatemp's shadiest warez dealer
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
1,553
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
651
Country
United States
Now that I think about it , everyone had something to hide

Trumps tax returns
Hillary's emails
Obamas birth certificate (at first)
Hmmm fishy :ph34r:
 

solarsaturn9

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
113
Trophies
1
Age
36
XP
269
Country
United States
Exploiting a loophole =/= not playing by the rules. Trump is playing by the rules, he's even abusing them.

Exploit literally means to "benefit unfairly from". So yes, you're right: he may be playing by the rules but that doesn't mean it's right or fair. The alternative is that he is doing more than exploiting a loophole. If he was able to share his taxes and cite the loopholes he was able to use to get around paying the "fair share" it would have been gold for his campaign. They could have pointed out exactly what they aim to fix. If this is the case it is clear he does not intend on closing the loop holes and making good on his campaign promises. Either way, it's shady as fuck. For that reason, in my opinion at least, he does not deserve the heavy responsibility that the title of POTUS bears.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Except I clearly did not advocate going by congressional district, as that opens the door for gerrymandering and abuse of even that alternative system.

My proposed alternative is based on popular vote on a state-by-state basis regardless of districts. It takes gerrymandering out of the picture entirely.

Excuse me, I misquoted. It's late here and I'm clearly tired.
 

Sketchy1

gbatemp's shadiest warez dealer
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
1,553
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
651
Country
United States
Exploit literally means to "benefit unfairly from". So yes, you're right: he may be playing by the rules but that doesn't mean it's right or fair. The alternative is that he is doing more than exploiting a loophole. If he was able to share his taxes and cite the loopholes he was able to use to get around paying the "fair share" it would have been gold for his campaign. They could have pointed out exactly what they aim to fix. If this is the case it is clear he does not intend on closing the loop holes and making good on his campaign promises. Either way, it's shady as fuck. For that reason, in my opinion at least, he does not deserve the heavy responsibility that the title of POTUS bears.
True, but now he has that presidential immunity right?
So even if he's caught, he can't get stung.
Same if Hillary were to win
 

solarsaturn9

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
113
Trophies
1
Age
36
XP
269
Country
United States
Oh so you're actually complaining about his lack of transparency? Trump doesn't owe you his tax returns, he's entitled to his privacy.

No, he is not. He gave that up the second he decided to run for the most powerful office on the planet. I suppose you think he's entitled to keep his businesses (or even let his children run them) while he is president?
 

Sketchy1

gbatemp's shadiest warez dealer
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
1,553
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
651
Country
United States
No, he is not. He gave that up the second he decided to run for the most powerful office on the planet. I suppose you think he's entitled to keep his businesses (or even let his children run them) while he is president?
Technically speaking, they are his businesses, so he actually is entitled to keep them if he wants.
But ofc, one will fail unless he can somehow manage both, which I highly doubt
 

Juiss

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
180
Trophies
0
Age
28
XP
127
Country
France
No, he is not. He gave that up the second he decided to run for the most powerful office on the planet. I suppose you think he's entitled to keep his businesses (or even let his children run them) while he is president?
His personal finances have nothing to do with being POTUS, so yes he is. He's also entitled to keeping his businesses if he chooses to do so, doesn't make it a good idea but that's beside the point.
 

solarsaturn9

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
113
Trophies
1
Age
36
XP
269
Country
United States
Technically speaking, they are his businesses, so he actually is entitled to keep them if he wants.
But ofc, one will fail unless he can somehow manage both, which I highly doubt

That's not how it works. He would then have the ability to create legislation for the sole purpose of his own financial benefit. It's a massive conflict of interest. Even if his children run the businesses it runs the risk of becoming nepotism.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

His personal finances have nothing to do with being POTUS, so yes he is. He's also entitled to keeping his businesses if he chooses to do so, doesn't make it a good idea but that's beside the point.

See above: his personal finances have the potential to get mingled in with his job as POTUS.
 

Juiss

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
180
Trophies
0
Age
28
XP
127
Country
France
That's not how it works. He would then have the ability to create legislation for the sole purpose of his own financial benefit. It's a massive conflict of interest. Even if his children run the businesses it runs the risk of becoming nepotism.
Please, go on.
 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
Is this tread still going on lol. Get over it, the US isn't innocent by any means. They hacked everybody's Phone and even officials and it's people from allied countries such as France, Germany, Belgium, UK, Spain, well the entire of Europe. They're even forcing Belgium to get rid of their F16 and buy F35's wich cost around 5 billion euro and yearly costs 250 million and only for those couple of planes just because you can arm them with Nukes wich we have here stationed by the states for a means to defend against Russia. That's all been while Obama was president. He and the Clintons have been searching more and more ways of aggravating the Russians. In my eyes forcing European countries to buy F35's with the sole purpose of firing Nukes is an act of war. But ey, it's Always when the states does something it's alright but when somebody else does something it has to be looked at with a magnifying glass. GET OVER IT !!! And another thing i keep seeing here brought up py people is that the US has the most powerful office in the world. Nope they don't ! They're a lot of richer countries with less debt and an infastructure way ahead of the US in almost all ways. Europe in it's whole and it's countries would already be a couple.
 
Last edited by kumikochan,

Cylent1

Community Smart Ass!
Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Messages
916
Trophies
0
Location
The most communist country in the world!
XP
2,438
Country
United States
@Costello Wow I guess news video with the truth coming out of the horses mouth is just not evidence enough for you?
I suppose it was fake?

It's a PROVEN FACT that Obama is a Muslim and also that his Birth Certificate is fake.
So why erase my post?

Better yet, I am offended! Now you understand?
 
Last edited by Cylent1,

Sketchy1

gbatemp's shadiest warez dealer
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
1,553
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
651
Country
United States
That's not how it works. He would then have the ability to create legislation for the sole purpose of his own financial benefit. It's a massive conflict of interest. Even if his children run the businesses it runs the risk of becoming nepotism.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



See above: his personal finances have the potential to get mingled in with his job as POTUS.
Even if he has the ability to, the thing is, You can't just strip him of his ownership simply just because. He is still just like any other citizen in terms of certain rights. A limited right to privacy, a right to keep your property, and the right to say what he wants :/

And besides, signing such legislation wouldn't be illegal, as it would affect other businesses too. As long as he doesn't abuse said legislation, no one else in the govt can actually do anything about it

And it wouldn't exactly become a nepotism because he can't appoint anyone of his friends or family to the cabinet, as that's illegal, and is already banned
 
Last edited by Sketchy1,

weegee721

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
55
Trophies
0
Location
'merca
XP
163
Country
United States

weegee721

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
55
Trophies
0
Location
'merca
XP
163
Country
United States
Yea I agree, this is not the place for political discussion.
I guess the admin/OP just wanted to gauge opinion on the site.
 

weegee721

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
55
Trophies
0
Location
'merca
XP
163
Country
United States
Lol yea, I was about to say, this is a place where we can get the 1337 ninty hax from the talented haxxors on the site, not a place for politics cause what that does is divide the site, and that's the last thing we want.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

True, but now he has that presidential immunity right?
So even if he's caught, he can't get stung.
Same if Hillary were to win
Congress can impeach a president, if they've broken the law
 

UltraDolphinRevolution

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Messages
1,806
Trophies
0
XP
2,436
Country
China
and because I'm a Muslim convert I am seriously under their microscope i bet
Scary, isn't it? Reminds one of North Korea. You can't even insist on a trial, as far as I know.
Fun fact: It's possible to go to jail in Germany for not paying the obligatory propaganda TV fee of 17,50 EUR per month. It's illegal but neither courts nor politicians do anything against it as it's a huge money generator (8 billion per year) and it gives politicians a platform.

BTW I'm interested to know how you became a Muslim. I can't figure out how to send a PM though.
 
Last edited by UltraDolphinRevolution,
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

Clydefrosch

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
6,022
Trophies
2
XP
4,619
Country
Germany
anyway, my heart goes out to the unfortunate people that will have to die once the ACA gets rewritten.
Scary, isn't it? Reminds one of North Korea. You can't even insist on a trial, as far as I know.
Fun fact: It's possible to go to jail in Germany for not paying the obligatory propaganda TV fee of 17,50 EUR per month. It's illegal but neither courts nor politicians do anything against it as it's a huge money generator (8 billion per year) and it gives politicians a platform.

BTW I'm interested to know how you became a Muslim. I can't figure out how to send a PM though.
lies, thats a lie and you know you're telling a lie.

the one woman out of the thousands of people who intentionally don't pay that money went into Beugehaft (coercive detention). not for not paying the broadcasting fee, but because somewhere along the way, she was supposed to present her financial situation and wouldn't. the state asked her to lay open her finances and it was her duty as citizen to do just that. but she wouldn't, so the state invoked coercive detention until she does. at any point during that detention, she only had to lay open her finances, as any other citizen would have to in that situation, and she would have been released from coercive detention instantly, just like any other citizen in coercive detention, without paying the broadcast fee still, mind you.


the fee is also not illegal. i'm moderately sure our highest courts have made that clear a bunch of times so far. because no matter how similar to a tax it is, it isn't a tax. the revenue isn't free to be used in times of financial need by the state. so it's not a hidden tax and not illegal.

as for bcoming a muslim, you convert, just like when you become a jew or a buddhist or a christian. you contact the local representatives, ask how one would go about converting, go through the paperwork (like leaving your current church), go trough the usual rites (like baptism, citing a view verses, removing your foreskin, etc) and then you enter that religion, pay whatever fee they want you to pay and live by that code, or pretend to, like most others.
 
Last edited by Clydefrosch,
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: aeiou